Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Kalu Ram v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9753-DB

The Delhi High Court held that disability pension is payable when a disability is aggravated by government service, quashing the denial of pension to a BSF personnel suffering from severe depressive disorder.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disability pension Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules 2023 aggravation of disability medical board certification

M/S Corporate Infotech Private Limited v. Union of India and Ors

06 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9757-DB

The Delhi High Court held that OEM authorization certificates required under special tender conditions are to be submitted post-award, not with the bid, and dismissed the petitioner’s challenge to the tender award.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender conditions OEM authorization certificate Standard Bid Document Part-II special conditions of contract

The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Ashish & Ors.

06 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9747
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award assessing a student claimant’s future earnings based on notional income and accepted a 75% permanent disability certificate despite wheelchair confinement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim compensation student claimant notional income

Umesh Kumar Verma v. Union of India Ministry of Power

06 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9758-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that disciplinary and related disputes pending before the Industrial Tribunal preclude writ jurisdiction, requiring exhaustion of statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 NTPC CDA Rules, 1977 post-retirement medical benefits disciplinary proceedings

Shivam Shukla v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

06 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9722
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a murder case, holding that a strong prima facie case and eyewitness identification outweigh the petitioner’s prolonged incarceration and contradictions in witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail Section 302 IPC prima facie case eyewitness identification

Hemant Kumar & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

06 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9727

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Deepak & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

06 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9726

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

06 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9744-DB

The Delhi High Court held that seniority of BSF officers promoted through LDCE must be fixed from the date of result declaration as per DoPT OM 1978, not from the date of joining training, and quashed the impugned seniority list.

administrative petition_allowed Significant seniority Limited Departmental Competitive Examination LDCE Border Security Force

North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Bal Kishan

06 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9743-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a substitute daily wager not completing 240 days of service is not entitled to retrenchment benefits or regularization under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the order granting partial back wages and regularization.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F retrenchment substitute daily wager

Shri Hukam Chand and Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

06 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9735

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition alleging unauthorized construction and illegal activity on a property found to have valid municipal and pollution control licenses.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition unauthorized construction illegal activity Health Trade License

Masjid Noori Jamia Arabia Nurululoom and Welfare Society v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

06 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9734

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as premature, directing that no action be taken against the petitioner’s property without a recommendation from the Religious Committee and after issuing requisite notice.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Delhi Development Authority Religious Committee requisite notice

Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research v. Union of India

06 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9715
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the National Medical Commission's reduction of MBBS seats due to persistent deficiencies and denied interim relief to admit additional students pending compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant National Medical Commission MBBS seat reduction Medical college inspection AEBAS attendance

Vikaramjeet Rana v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Manisha Rana

06 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9719

The Delhi High Court held that interim rent maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act can be modified or ceased when the aggrieved woman acquires alternate accommodation and is financially independent.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 interim maintenance modification of order change of circumstances

Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. The State; Ritu Sharma

06 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9720
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a complainant’s appeal against acquittal under the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C., remanding the case for retrial due to non-service of summons and ensuring the complainant’s right to a fair trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 372 Cr.P.C. Section 378 Cr.P.C. Appeal against acquittal Complainant's right of appeal

Jai Kumar Gupta v. Kamal Kumar Gupta

06 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025 SCC OnLine 1148
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to recall the quashing of an FIR based on alleged violation of a family settlement, holding that such recall is impermissible under Section 362 Cr.P.C. and that violations must be pursued through civil or arbitration remedies.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 362 Cr.P.C. Family Settlement

Ravinder Mandal v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9729

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a child sexual assault case due to material contradictions in testimony and doubtful forensic evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable and corroborative proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness testimony POCSO Act Section 376 IPC sexual assault

Mohammad Talha v. M/S KARIM HOTELS PVT. LTD

06 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9713-DB

The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction restraining use of 'GULSHAN-E-KARIM', allowing use subject to a prominent disclaimer to prevent consumer confusion with the registered 'KARIM' trademark.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Likelihood of confusion Trade Marks Act, 1999 Interim injunction

Farhana Sami v. Dynamik Developers Pvt Ltd

06 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9717

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to amend the Written Statement after trial commencement, holding that no due diligence was shown to justify the amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence commencement of trial

Keshav @ Sonu v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9716-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that the stabbing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation or intent to cause death.

criminal sentence_modified Significant murder culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC

Vijay Rajak v. Union of India

06 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9979-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate merely named in an FIR related to matrimonial offences but neither charge-sheeted nor tried cannot be declared unsuitable for CISF appointment under MHA guidelines, quashing the cancellation of his provisional appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CISF recruitment MHA Policy Guidelines 2012 FIR in matrimonial disputes charge-sheet