Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
SANDISK LLC v. M/S. WELBORN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction against a defendant for trade dress and trademark infringement after the defendant discontinued the impugned packaging and undertook not to use confusingly similar trade dress in future.
Rajvir v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 15(b) NDPS Act for possession of 15 kg poppy straw but modified the sentence to the period already served in light of the appellant's remorse and Supreme Court directions.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex JWO Rajiw Kumar Mishra
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired airman, affirming the presumption that disabilities detected post-entry are service-connected unless rebutted by the employer.
Union of India & Ors. v. No. 14634971 Hav Sajiraj R (Retd)
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired soldier, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless disproved by the employer, and clarified the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction.
M/S. DELHI AUTOMOBILE LTD. v. M/S. TANEJA DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint disclosing a cause of action cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely because the defendant disputes fulfillment of contractual conditions or alleges revocation.
Manish Sharma v. Additional Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Customs penalty and confiscation orders, holding that alternate statutory remedies must be exhausted and that a Power of Attorney holder complicit in misdeclaration is liable for penalty.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Deep Chand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting retrospective promotion benefits to employees redeployed after closure of DEDA, dismissing the Government's challenge to the promotion's legality.
The Commissioner of Police and Ors. v. Sheotaj Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order setting aside departmental proceedings against a police officer, holding that allegations arising from a civil dispute without clear misconduct do not warrant disciplinary action.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Kamlesh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of family pension with interest, holding that discrepancies in identity documents cannot justify withholding pension and the employer remains liable despite delays caused by its authorized bank.
Perfect Industries v. Goods and Service Tax Officer, Delhi Department of Trade and Taxes & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to non-communication of notices on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Myratgeldi Mammedov v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking release of a gold chain confiscated for smuggling, upholding the Customs Department's Order-in-Original and rejecting claims of illegal detention and arrest.
Union of India & Anr. v. Neeraj Prasad & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's three-month timeline for holding a promotion committee, holding that extension of time must be sought before the Tribunal itself.
The New India Assurance Company Limited v. M/S Shiv Shakti Products Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree directing insurer to pay compensation for rainwater damage, holding that the surveyor's repudiation was not binding and that unpleaded deductions cannot be raised on appeal.
The New India Assurance Company Limited v. M/S Shiv Shakti Products Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree directing the insurer to pay compensation for rainwater damage, holding that surveyor reports are important but not binding and that new pleas not pleaded at trial cannot be raised on appeal.
Bhai Manjit Singh HUF & Ors. v. Punit Beriwala
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint for specific performance cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely for non-disclosure of agreement date or time for performance when the suit is filed within limitation from refusal to perform.
BSES Yamuna Power Limited v. Bhagwanti & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that electricity connections may be granted or continued in premises booked for unauthorized construction where no enforcement action has been taken, subject to disconnection upon MCD’s demolition or sealing action.
Sudesh Kumar Bhola v. Parveen Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order rejecting the petitioner's application to dismiss a suit as barred by limitation, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action within limitation requiring trial.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Capt. A.S. Bhardwaj & Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that a co-owner claiming a defined share can maintain a suit for eviction and the question of partition is to be decided at trial.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Kumari Pratima Pal & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of compensation based on minimum wages in Delhi and interest at 9% per annum, dismissing the insurance company’s appeal.
Kumar Singh and Sgt. Mritunjay v. 724721 EX SGT MANOJ K L RETD
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption of service-attributability and limiting writ interference to errors of law apparent on record.