Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Meenu Gupta v. Sandeep Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld supervised visitation rights for the father, emphasizing the child's welfare and gradual bonding despite exclusive custody with the mother.
Subedar AC Jeya Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a service transfer, allowing retention of accommodation and favorable leave consideration to mitigate educational hardship.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Suraj Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer's appeal in a motor accident claim by upholding jurisdiction and most compensation heads but reducing attendant charges and loss of income awards.
Shrinivas Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the denial of higher pay scales to a Junior Investigator, holding that unauthorized merger of posts without Ministry approval does not entitle pay scale upgradation.
Hansraj Bansal v. Abdul Ahad
The Delhi High Court held that unlicensed money lending does not bar prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside trial court orders dismissing complaints on that ground, remanding them for trial.
Rahul Puri and Ors. v. Sanjay Bansal
The Delhi High Court allowed limited cross-examination of the plaintiff with restrictions on questions and imposed legal costs to compensate for trial delays, emphasizing compliance with court directions.
Mukesh Kumar v. Sunita Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint on limitation grounds, holding the suit was within limitation under Article 1 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and no jurisdictional error was made.
Staff Selection Commission v. Balkar Mor
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh committee to re-examine candidates' cases where criminal investigations are ongoing, holding that such parallel inquiry is impermissible.
P K Bohra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that suspension extension recommended within 90 days by the competent authority and approved later by the Central Government is valid and does not render the suspension period invalid.
Pradeep and Ors. v. Savitri Sidana and Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's order permitting the respondent's husband to be examined as a witness before the respondent herself, as the respondent did not intend to testify personally, thus dismissing the petition challenging the order.
M/S EOS DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. M/S CYAN FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's orders allowing change of authorised representative and admission of additional documents, holding acceptance of costs estops challenge and the petition barred by delay.
M/S SMS LOGISTICS v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL), NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the revocation of a Customs Broker License imposed for filing a Bill of Entry based on a disputed High Sea Sales Agreement, holding the punishment disproportionate and emphasizing the doctrine of proportionality in administrative disciplinary actions.
Arjun Aggarwal & Ors. v. Govind Ram Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order proceeding with trial despite pending but unpressed applications under Order VII Rule 10 and 11 CPC, dismissing the petitioners' review application and condemning their delay tactics.
Gopal Jha v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against the petitioner for sexual offences, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed despite delay and discrepancies, and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR and charges.
Saurabh Tripathi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with penetrative sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, relying on consistent victim testimony and DNA evidence to deny bail.
State v. Kamlesh Bahadur
The High Court set aside the acquittal under section 308 IPC and convicted the accused under section 323 IPC for causing simple injuries, emphasizing the necessity of proving intention or knowledge for section 308 offences.
M/S RAHUL KUMAR JAIN AND CO. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed a GST registration cancellation order for lack of reasons and violation of natural justice, emphasizing the need for specific grounds in show cause notices and orders.
Vinod Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a director cannot be personally prosecuted under Section 138 NI Act without the company being made a party, dismissing the leave petition against the trial court's order.
Brij Mohan Sarna v. Sushma Chawla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the suit property was used exclusively for commercial purposes, affirming the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and summary decree for possession under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Prem Behl v. Lalit Chanana and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Independent Director who resigned prior to a complaint and was not involved in day-to-day management cannot be held personally liable for non-payment of employees' salaries under the Delhi Shops & Establishment Act, 1954 without specific evidence of knowledge or involvement.