Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Smt. Omwati and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the bus driver, and a typographical error in cross-examination could not absolve liability.
Kumar Gaurav & Anr. v. State N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for grievous injury but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering the petitioners' age, health, and family responsibilities, imposing a cost payable to a government relief fund.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 v. Global Logic India Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing due to lack of segmental data and dismissed the revenue’s appeal challenging the treatment of foreign exchange gains/losses.
Mohammad Irshad & Ors. v. The State of NCT, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking declaration of lapse of land acquisition proceedings from 1948 under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that concluded acquisitions cannot be reopened after decades.
Rekha Drall v. Vikash Drall
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal against a Family Court decree granting divorce to the husband on grounds of mental cruelty including threats of suicide and false criminal allegations.
Sateesh Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Ward-28(5), Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has the power to annul assessment orders under Section 251 of the Income Tax Act, and statutory remedies must be exhausted before approaching the High Court.
Brij Mohan v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the termination of an employee following a valid disciplinary enquiry conducted by competent authorities in accordance with law and principles of natural justice.
Shefali Khuller Ahuja v. Dharmendra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against NDMC and Wonderland School, holding that the respondents complied with the Court’s 2020 order regarding license fee payments and audits under the Right to Free Education Act.
M/S. ASHA AUTO AGENCIES AND ORS v. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's order refusing to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit was within limitation and territorial jurisdiction and no jurisdictional error was committed.
Seema v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld divorce granted on cruelty grounds due to the wife's refusal to consummate marriage, rejecting her appeal challenging the decree.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. ANJU & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a vehicle owner who verifies a driver’s licence on its face and tests the driver’s competence is not liable for a fake licence, dismissing the insurer’s appeal to recover compensation from the owner and driver.
INTERNATIONAL FOODSTUFFS CO. LLC v. VIJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND PAWAN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark dispute between International Foodstuffs Co. LLC and respondents based on a lawful settlement agreement delineating trademark rights and use.
Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha & Anr v. M/S Arora Sationers and Ors
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in terms of a mutually agreed settlement concerning design infringement, binding the parties to the settlement terms and ordering partial refund of court fees.
Paisalo Digital Limited v. Puran Murti Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause.
Sanghi Bros (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. v. Kamlendra Singh
The Delhi High Court held that although the plaintiffs were ready and willing to perform their contract for sale of property, specific performance was denied due to revocation by the defendant, creation of third party interest, and equitable considerations.
Braham Prakash @ Khargosh v. State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the framing of charges under Section 307 IPC due to lack of reasoning and absence of necessary ingredients, remanding the case for appropriate charge framing.
Surender Prasad v. Central Public Works Department
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a muster roll employee detained on serious criminal charges under departmental policy, holding that such termination does not attract retrenchment protections under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Suresh Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement between parties and absence of a prima facie case, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
S P Bajaj v. Shaurya Housing Ltd. (In Liqn.) Through OL and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the auction sale of a liquidated company's property, ruling that reserve price below circle rate and publication in local newspapers sufficed for a valid auction.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow street vendors to vend peacefully within designated zones under valid certificates, subject to compliance with prescribed terms and conditions.