Delhi High Court
33,081 judgments
Gautam Jindal v. Meenu Jindal
The Delhi High Court upheld limited visitation rights granted to the father, denying custody and refusing to enhance visitation, emphasizing the child's welfare and preference.
Rajender Kumar v. Sudershan Rawla
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 to record and enforce an installment-based settlement of rent arrears, directing the trial court to verify compliance and permitting recovery of the full amount on default.
Delhi Development Authority & Ors. v. Jamuna Devi
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim order permitting deposit of misuse charges for land conversion, directed release of the deposited amount with interest, and ordered the trial court to decide the suit on merits.
KOA Investment Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward14(4)
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the issue was already examined during original assessment and procedural requirements were not complied with.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- 12, New Delhi v. MS L AND T SUCG JV CC27
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the Tribunal's decision that no penalty under Section 271AA of the Income Tax Act was warranted due to reasonable cause for non-disclosure of a related party transaction.
M/S E-HOMES INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. v. Competition Commission of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the National Anti-Profiteering Authority’s order for violation of natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with due procedural fairness.
Naveen Khatri v. State of NCT of Delhi
Bail application of accused in a serious murder case involving recovery of victim's body and evidence destruction attempts was dismissed due to gravity of offence and ongoing trial.
Priyanka Sahni v. Mohan Lal Sahni
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim injunction restraining petitioners from entering the matrimonial home, upholding concurrent lower court orders and directing expeditious trial disposal.
Meenu Gupta v. Sandeep Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld supervised visitation rights for the father, emphasizing the child's welfare and gradual bonding despite exclusive custody with the mother.
Subedar AC Jeya Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a service transfer, allowing retention of accommodation and favorable leave consideration to mitigate educational hardship.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Suraj Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer's appeal in a motor accident claim by upholding jurisdiction and most compensation heads but reducing attendant charges and loss of income awards.
Shrinivas Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the denial of higher pay scales to a Junior Investigator, holding that unauthorized merger of posts without Ministry approval does not entitle pay scale upgradation.
Hansraj Bansal v. Abdul Ahad
The Delhi High Court held that unlicensed money lending does not bar prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside trial court orders dismissing complaints on that ground, remanding them for trial.
Rahul Puri and Ors. v. Sanjay Bansal
The Delhi High Court allowed limited cross-examination of the plaintiff with restrictions on questions and imposed legal costs to compensate for trial delays, emphasizing compliance with court directions.
Mukesh Kumar v. Sunita Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint on limitation grounds, holding the suit was within limitation under Article 1 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and no jurisdictional error was made.
Staff Selection Commission v. Balkar Mor
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh committee to re-examine candidates' cases where criminal investigations are ongoing, holding that such parallel inquiry is impermissible.
P K Bohra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that suspension extension recommended within 90 days by the competent authority and approved later by the Central Government is valid and does not render the suspension period invalid.
Pradeep and Ors. v. Savitri Sidana and Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's order permitting the respondent's husband to be examined as a witness before the respondent herself, as the respondent did not intend to testify personally, thus dismissing the petition challenging the order.
M/S EOS DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. M/S CYAN FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's orders allowing change of authorised representative and admission of additional documents, holding acceptance of costs estops challenge and the petition barred by delay.
M/S SMS LOGISTICS v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL), NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the revocation of a Customs Broker License imposed for filing a Bill of Entry based on a disputed High Sea Sales Agreement, holding the punishment disproportionate and emphasizing the doctrine of proportionality in administrative disciplinary actions.