Delhi High Court
33,081 judgments
Arjun Aggarwal & Ors. v. Govind Ram Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order proceeding with trial despite pending but unpressed applications under Order VII Rule 10 and 11 CPC, dismissing the petitioners' review application and condemning their delay tactics.
Gopal Jha v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against the petitioner for sexual offences, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed despite delay and discrepancies, and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR and charges.
Saurabh Tripathi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with penetrative sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, relying on consistent victim testimony and DNA evidence to deny bail.
State v. Kamlesh Bahadur
The High Court set aside the acquittal under section 308 IPC and convicted the accused under section 323 IPC for causing simple injuries, emphasizing the necessity of proving intention or knowledge for section 308 offences.
M/S RAHUL KUMAR JAIN AND CO. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed a GST registration cancellation order for lack of reasons and violation of natural justice, emphasizing the need for specific grounds in show cause notices and orders.
Vinod Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a director cannot be personally prosecuted under Section 138 NI Act without the company being made a party, dismissing the leave petition against the trial court's order.
Brij Mohan Sarna v. Sushma Chawla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the suit property was used exclusively for commercial purposes, affirming the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and summary decree for possession under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Prem Behl v. Lalit Chanana and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Independent Director who resigned prior to a complaint and was not involved in day-to-day management cannot be held personally liable for non-payment of employees' salaries under the Delhi Shops & Establishment Act, 1954 without specific evidence of knowledge or involvement.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Heera Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced compensation by 25% due to contributory negligence, upheld the Tribunal's jurisdiction, and rejected insurer's recovery claim against driver and owner in a motor accident claim.
Indiamart Intermesh Limited v. Mr Sameer Samim Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages against a defendant for unauthorized use of the registered trademark "INDIAMART" and associated logos in domain names, directing the domain registrar to transfer the infringing domains to the plaintiff.
43 Bharat Steel Tube Karamchari Union v. M/S Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Company Court's order directing workmen to vacate factory quarters post claim payment, emphasizing the need to press objections timely and follow proper appeal procedures.
M/S. JRA INFRATECH v. ENGINEERING PROJECTS(INDIA) LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that disputes involving allegations of fraud are arbitrable unless the arbitration agreement is prima facie void, and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising from the contract.
Dr. Nithya Nair v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory requirement of an office seal on sponsorship certificates for Priority III PG medical course candidates under AFMS, rejecting petitioners' claims based on technical non-compliance despite higher merit.
Major Sandeep Rana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings against a Territorial Army officer under the Army Act were without jurisdiction and ordered his reinstatement with compensation for mala fide and arbitrary actions.
State v. Sunil & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a sexual assault case due to failure of prosecution to prove victim's minor age and forcible sexual acts beyond reasonable doubt.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central -II), Delhi v. Thapar Homes Limited
The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act must be initiated and completed within the prescribed limitation period under Section 275(1)(c), and the issuance of notice after limitation expiry cannot validate a penalty order.
Parvesh v. National Insurance Company
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by assessing the deceased's income based on loan repayments and adding future prospects, clarifying that minimum wages are a guideline but not absolute for income determination.
Nazma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow the petitioner to vend within the permitted zone strictly in accordance with her Certificate of Vending and applicable laws, without undue interference.
Ravinder Sharma v. Rupender Singh Walia
The Delhi High Court held that after dropping Section 145 Cr.P.C. proceedings for lack of breach of peace, the SDM retains jurisdiction to pass incidental orders restoring status quo, including permitting reconstruction of a damaged wall, but not to allow installation of CCTV cameras.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Mohd Yusuf & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying UP's skilled worker minimum wages, adding future prospects, and awarding loss of consortium to all claimants, setting aside the Tribunal's lower award based on Delhi's unskilled wages.