Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Aug 1977 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9830-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 20

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s voluntary retirement took effect on 1 February 2018 by deemed acceptance, entitling him to pensionary benefits despite subsequent procedural formalities.

administrative petition_allowed Significant voluntary retirement Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Rule 48(A) technical resignation

Union of India v. Central PWD Engineers Association

26 May 1977 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9151-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside a CAT order promoting engineers based on a fictitious 1977 Notification, remanding the matter for fresh consideration excluding reliance on that Notification.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Promotion eligibility Central Public Works Department Notification dated 26 May 1977 Diploma equivalence

North East Engineering and Construction v. Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited

15 Dec 1976 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:811
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes under a valid arbitration agreement are prima facie arbitrable and appointed an arbitrator, leaving detailed arbitrability and merits to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Arbitrability Contractual claim notice

Amit Johri v. Deepak Johri & Ors.

19 Jul 1976 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1009-DB

The Delhi High Court held that property inherited under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is self-acquired property of the heir and does not vest by birth in his son, dismissing the suit for partition and possession by the son during the father's lifetime.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 8 ancestral property self-acquired property

Darshan Kaur v. Union of India

31 Mar 1976 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:7208
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that misuse charges are payable for exclusive office use of leased property by a foreign mission, dismissed the petitioner's challenge, and upheld the demand as a condition for conversion from leasehold to freehold.

property petition_dismissed Significant misuse charges leasehold to freehold conversion foreign mission Office Order No. 29/83

Reserve Bank of India v. B S Rawat

01 Feb 1973 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:1600-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's reduction of dismissal to discharge simpliciter, affirming the Tribunal's jurisdiction and the principle of proportionality in punishment under the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 11A modification of punishment dismissal from service

Jagdish Prasad & Ors. v. University of Delhi & Ors.

01 Jan 1973 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:3360

The Delhi High Court held that employees occupying staff quarters provided by UGC-funded colleges or their Trusts are not entitled to HRA, and recoveries of unauthorized payments can only be made prospectively from the date of UGC's clear direction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant House Rent Allowance University Grants Commission Staff Quarters Recovery of Excess Payment

Ravi v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Dec 1972 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:3164
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Banks Board Bureau lacks jurisdiction to conduct selections for Public Sector General Insurance Companies, quashing ACC circulars expanding its mandate and invalidating the impugned appointments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Banks Board Bureau Public Sector General Insurance Companies Banking Companies Act, 1980 General Insurance Business Nationalisation Act, 1972

Vakamulla Chandrashekhar & Ors. v. Registrar of Companies

03 May 1972 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3915
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that subordinate courts lack jurisdiction to restore complaints dismissed for non-appearance, quashing the restoration and summons orders in a Companies Act offence case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant restoration of complaint functus officio non-appearance Section 482 CrPC

Jurgaj Singh v. BSES Yamuna Power Limited

15 Dec 1971 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:5361
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to compel supply of documents for appeal against removal, holding that the respondent had duly performed its public duty and provided fair opportunity of hearing.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ of mandamus disciplinary proceedings natural justice public duty

Keshav Chander Thakur & Anr. v. Krishan Chander & Ors.

11 Dec 1970 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2628-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a 1976 partition decree and a 1970 registered sub-lease, holding that the minor was effectively represented, the appellants had knowledge of the decree, and the suit was barred and frivolous.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXII Rule 3 CPC Order XXXII Rule 3A CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC partition decree

Harmeetpal Singh Bindra & Ors. v. Citibank & Anr.

04 Oct 1970 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:4236
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court held that surrender of a life insurance policy under Section 6 of the Married Women’s Property Act with trustee consent is valid and directed the insurer to release the policy proceeds for the benefit of minor beneficiaries.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Married Women’s Property Act insurance policy surrender trustee consent Indian Trust Act

Sumita Mazumder v. Debasish Mazumder

22 Apr 1969 · Kailash Gambhir; P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:11710-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside an ex parte divorce decree due to inordinate delay and laches, affirming that prompt action is required to challenge such decrees under the Special Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant ex parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC Special Marriage Act 1954 divorce

Suman Lata v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.

20 Dec 1968 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Sanjiv Khanna; Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:1968-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Anganwadi workers do not hold civil posts under the State and their service claims do not lie before Administrative Tribunals, but allowed the writ petition as the tribunal’s decision had attained finality.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Anganwadi workers Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 civil post service matters

National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj v. K. N. Sati and Ors.

07 Feb 1967 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's decision invalidating the downward refixation of pay and recovery of alleged excess payments without prior notice, holding such recovery barred after five years and emphasizing strict compliance with natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant pay fixation downward refixation recovery of excess payment natural justice

Chetan Sabharwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 28 (1)

09 Jan 1967 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:3837-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging reopening of income tax assessments under Sections 147/148, holding that investigation reports constituted sufficient material and no impermissible change of opinion occurred.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Reopening of assessment

Jeger Ali Oagaz v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

17 Sep 1966 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:9124
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner who unknowingly carried one cartridge, holding that conscious possession is essential to constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act 1959 conscious possession constructive possession quashing of FIR

Ashok Sardana & Anr. v. Pramod Sardana & Anr.

27 Feb 1966 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:925-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the appellant's claim that the New Friends Colony property was joint family property, affirming individual ownership by Late Smt. Dropadi Devi based on title and evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit joint family property benami transaction Hindu Undivided Family

Ram Murti Bansal v. Union of India & Anr.

22 Sep 1964 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5295
Cites 0 · Cited by 36

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking retrospective promotion after a 21-year delay, holding that delay and laches bar interference with settled seniority and promotion rights under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches promotion seniority Article 226

Balvinder Kaur & Ors. v. University of Delhi & Ors.

22 Sep 1964 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:5719

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by legal heirs seeking retrospective promotion of a deceased lecturer due to inordinate delay, laches, and non-fulfillment of mandatory eligibility criteria under the Merit Promotion Scheme.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches promotion Merit Promotion Scheme Article 226