Delhi High Court
33,049 judgments
Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha & Anr v. M/S Arora Sationers and Ors
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in terms of a mutually agreed settlement concerning design infringement, binding the parties to the settlement terms and ordering partial refund of court fees.
Paisalo Digital Limited v. Puran Murti Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause.
Sanghi Bros (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. v. Kamlendra Singh
The Delhi High Court held that although the plaintiffs were ready and willing to perform their contract for sale of property, specific performance was denied due to revocation by the defendant, creation of third party interest, and equitable considerations.
Braham Prakash @ Khargosh v. State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the framing of charges under Section 307 IPC due to lack of reasoning and absence of necessary ingredients, remanding the case for appropriate charge framing.
Surender Prasad v. Central Public Works Department
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a muster roll employee detained on serious criminal charges under departmental policy, holding that such termination does not attract retrenchment protections under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Suresh Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement between parties and absence of a prima facie case, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
S P Bajaj v. Shaurya Housing Ltd. (In Liqn.) Through OL and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the auction sale of a liquidated company's property, ruling that reserve price below circle rate and publication in local newspapers sufficed for a valid auction.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow street vendors to vend peacefully within designated zones under valid certificates, subject to compliance with prescribed terms and conditions.
Living Media India Limited & Anr. v. Aabtak Channel.com (John Does) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the suffix 'TAK' is the dominant part of the plaintiffs' trademarks and granted permanent injunctions against defendants using confusingly similar marks incorporating 'TAK', applying the exception to the anti-dissection rule.
Pr. Commissioner Income Tax Centre-2 v. M/S S.G. Portfolio Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals, affirming that mandatory procedural requirements including issuance of notice under Section 143(2) and independent sanction under Section 151 are essential for valid reassessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Ishrail Ali v. The State Govt NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in robbery with a toy pistol, holding that exhibition of a weapon causing fear suffices for Section 397 IPC and material evidence justified denial of bail.
Amrit Lal Chaurasiya & Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the MCD to permit street vendors to vend within their zones in compliance with their Certificates of Vending and without unlawful interference.
Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Limited v. CIT (IT), Delhi-3
The Delhi High Court set aside erroneous tax assessment forms issued under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, allowed the revenue to rework calculations and issue fresh forms, and ordered release of interim deposits to the petitioner.
Raj Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for forensic reports and further investigation into a death, holding that medical evidence showed no foul play and the cause of death was undetermined.
Mahammad Yakoob & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed street vendors holding valid certificates to vend within specified zones subject to compliance with certificate conditions and permitted deletion of certain petitioners from the writ petition.
Gandharva Infrastructure and Projects Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the forfeiture of 100% Earnest Money Deposit where the appellant sought to modify its bid after acceptance and issuance of the work order, holding that such modification is impermissible post-contract and the tender validity clause ceases to apply.
Krishanpal Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend lawfully within the permitted zone under his valid Certificate of Vending, subject to compliance with all terms and conditions.
Suman Ali v. Diljeet Singh Dogra Alias Deepak Dogra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of an application for judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that no clear and unequivocal admission existed to dispense with trial.
Union of India and Ors. v. Surendra Kumar Gaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing full reimbursement of emergency medical expenses incurred in a non-recognized hospital, emphasizing that genuine emergency treatment claims cannot be mechanically restricted by CGHS rates.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Dalbir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of a probationary warder under CCS (Temporary Services) Rules without inquiry, distinguishing termination simpliciter from punitive dismissal requiring Article 311 protections.