Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Heera Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced compensation by 25% due to contributory negligence, upheld the Tribunal's jurisdiction, and rejected insurer's recovery claim against driver and owner in a motor accident claim.
Indiamart Intermesh Limited v. Mr Sameer Samim Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages against a defendant for unauthorized use of the registered trademark "INDIAMART" and associated logos in domain names, directing the domain registrar to transfer the infringing domains to the plaintiff.
43 Bharat Steel Tube Karamchari Union v. M/S Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Company Court's order directing workmen to vacate factory quarters post claim payment, emphasizing the need to press objections timely and follow proper appeal procedures.
M/S. JRA INFRATECH v. ENGINEERING PROJECTS(INDIA) LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that disputes involving allegations of fraud are arbitrable unless the arbitration agreement is prima facie void, and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising from the contract.
Dr. Nithya Nair v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory requirement of an office seal on sponsorship certificates for Priority III PG medical course candidates under AFMS, rejecting petitioners' claims based on technical non-compliance despite higher merit.
Major Sandeep Rana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings against a Territorial Army officer under the Army Act were without jurisdiction and ordered his reinstatement with compensation for mala fide and arbitrary actions.
State v. Sunil & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a sexual assault case due to failure of prosecution to prove victim's minor age and forcible sexual acts beyond reasonable doubt.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central -II), Delhi v. Thapar Homes Limited
The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act must be initiated and completed within the prescribed limitation period under Section 275(1)(c), and the issuance of notice after limitation expiry cannot validate a penalty order.
Parvesh v. National Insurance Company
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by assessing the deceased's income based on loan repayments and adding future prospects, clarifying that minimum wages are a guideline but not absolute for income determination.
Nazma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow the petitioner to vend within the permitted zone strictly in accordance with her Certificate of Vending and applicable laws, without undue interference.
Ravinder Sharma v. Rupender Singh Walia
The Delhi High Court held that after dropping Section 145 Cr.P.C. proceedings for lack of breach of peace, the SDM retains jurisdiction to pass incidental orders restoring status quo, including permitting reconstruction of a damaged wall, but not to allow installation of CCTV cameras.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Mohd Yusuf & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying UP's skilled worker minimum wages, adding future prospects, and awarding loss of consortium to all claimants, setting aside the Tribunal's lower award based on Delhi's unskilled wages.
ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, NEW DELHI v. M/S. SALUJA CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld that reassessment under Section 153A cannot be initiated without incriminating material found during search in cases of completed assessments, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
United India Ins Co Ltd v. Rohtash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of compensation including 89% functional disability and prosthetic limb costs, dismissing the insurer’s appeal challenging these assessments.
Suresh v. Kamla Devi Notiyal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of objections in execution proceedings, holding that ownership of immovable property can only be transferred by a registered sale deed, and documents like General Power of Attorney and Agreement to Sell do not confer title.
Joginder Kumar v. Managing Director North West Airlines & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Tribunal's award, holding that the petitioner was not an employee of the principal employer and that the seven-year delay in filing the petition was unjustified.
Czech Games Edition SRO & Ors. v. M S Lifestyle You Through Its Proprietor Mr Vineet Mundra
The Delhi High Court decreed a commercial suit in favor of plaintiffs in a trademark dispute based on a lawful settlement agreement acknowledging plaintiffs' rights and defendant's undertakings to cease infringement.
Nadeem Majid Oomerbhoy v. Sh. Gautam Tank and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that infringement cannot be found against a registered trademark holder without invalidating their registration and exercised suo motu powers to examine the validity of the defendants' trademark registration in an 18-year-old infringement suit.
F HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & OTHERS v. DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court held that suits challenging biosimilar drug approvals granted by DCGI disclose cause of action and are maintainable, dismissing defendants' applications for rejection of plaints under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Kesar Ali & Anr. v. Santosh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to correct the multiplier based on the deceased's age and granted future prospects enhancement in motor accident compensation following Supreme Court precedents.