UNKNOWN COURT
476 judgments
54a17203762ea4e65dd54803ccac835a3d6f7a1cd8cc429c19796c63c3d50bb4
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, affirming the trial and High Court's findings on evidence and law, and dismissed the appellant's appeal.
b0798dbddf8d645136a89fe62c46552e97db182728157c219258af7f1917971a
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that concurrent findings of fact by lower courts should not be disturbed without compelling reasons.
f0087d2b41f85d1dcc2e78f1c7cc348bde879847fd9b04c30d20b1219688688b
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming the sufficiency of evidence and rejecting procedural irregularity claims.
c170449ee1e7a6763b90feda186e3beb7bdc2f12c01ba8c4203e3d651df4ae21
The High Court upheld the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, affirming the sufficiency of prosecution evidence and absence of procedural irregularities.
9cf81a0d823a2675604873c5ba56e245d882870797aa9781f704cba78b0019b9
The court allowed the appeal, holding that the petitioner established valid ownership and possession of the disputed lands through credible evidence and valid transactions, overturning the lower court's decision.
3d855a9abe5bd83f90400240df332201c633837ef0161ac29f1d788ad35749d8
The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner for causing injuries, affirming the trial court’s findings and dismissing the appeal for lack of merit.
3. ��.:) woodJCJ 11-9-1989 cfw� vs � gco6o[6] �og)oc[5] t3oe �� Z..,$ �6��, �o� �o�ooo:i) �S°do g)��o ��s�� �Q).)� �QOJ �Qg)oo t3oe& ��.J WCJOOJ� g)���, ����co�, �o�eJ06 eS[6] ��� l,.!).�o.84712000�, �6 28-06-2005 N°e.:> "--
The court upheld the conviction under Sections 406, 498A, and 500 IPC for matrimonial cruelty, criminal breach of trust, and defamation, dismissing the appeal and affirming the trial court’s judgment.
a3062b5be98ac04db0c1e370017f03a748066e15671da2992ca0fa48ab56cfc0
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction and sentence, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and procedural safeguards were observed.