Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Mithilesh v. State of NCT, Delhi

28 May 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for food adulteration due to presence of salt and excess ash in red chilly powder, affirming that lowering quality below prescribed standards constitutes adulteration even if not injurious to health, and dismissed the appeal against the minimum sentence imposed.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant food adulteration Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Section 2(ia)(m) sodium chloride

Swiss Timing Limited v. Organising Committee, Commonwealth Games 2010, Delhi

28 May 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; B. P. Singh; Kuldip Singh

The Supreme Court held that allegations of contract voidness and pending criminal proceedings do not bar reference to arbitration, affirming the separability of arbitration clauses and directing constitution of the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause separability void contract arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 11(6)

Reliance Industries Limited & Anr. v. Union of India

28 May 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that where the arbitration agreement is governed by English law and the seat of arbitration is London, Indian courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 to challenge the arbitral award, excluding Part I of the Act's applicability.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement seat of arbitration governing law Part I Arbitration Act applicability

Bal Kishan Giri v. State of U.P.

28 May 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of an advocate for criminal contempt for baseless allegations against High Court judges, rejecting his apology as insincere and reducing the fine to the statutory limit.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal contempt Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 apology in contempt judicial independence

State of Haryana v. Satender

23 May 2014 · A.K. Sikri; B.S. Chauhan

The Supreme Court upheld convictions of two accused for murder with common intention while affirming acquittal of another due to lack of evidence of overt act or common intention.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant common intention Section 34 IPC murder conspiracy

Joginder Pal & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

23 May 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that in a tainted public service selection, non-tainted candidates must be segregated and cannot be denied service continuation, setting aside mass cancellation orders that violated constitutional equality guarantees.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Punjab Public Service Commission corruption in public service selection tainted and non-tainted candidates Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution

Sudarshan & Anr v. State of Maharashtra

23 May 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court set aside the murder convictions of the appellants due to procedural lapses and suspicious circumstances indicating the FIR was ante-timed, entitling them to the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR ante-timed FIR Section 302 IPC benefit of doubt

Krishan Kumar v. State of Haryana

23 May 2014 · B.S. Chauhan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal searches, not to searches of bags, and upheld the conviction where the search of the bag was conducted in presence of a Gazetted Officer and Executive Magistrate.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act search of person vs. search of bag Executive Magistrate proof of official status

Paulmeli & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu

23 May 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming that evidence of hostile witnesses and identification in partial darkness can sustain conviction if reliable.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC hostile witness identification FIR

Mahavir Singh v. State of Haryana

23 May 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on the last seen theory and circumstantial evidence, dismissing challenges regarding motive, recovery, and witness discrepancies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant last seen theory circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Union of India & Ors. v. R.P. Singh

22 May 2014 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that when disciplinary action relies on UPSC advice, it must be communicated to the charged officer before punishment to comply with natural justice, dismissing the appeal and affirming the High Court's order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant natural justice UPSC advice disciplinary proceedings Rule 32 CCS Rules

B.S. Sandhu v. Government of India

21 May 2014 · A. K. Patnaik; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that notification under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 does not automatically render land as 'forest land' under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, setting aside the High Court's blanket classification of village Karoran land as forest land and remanding for fresh consideration.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 forest land definition administrative control

Md. Jamiluddin Nasir v. State of West Bengal

21 May 2014 · A.K. Patnaik; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court struck down the mandatory death penalty under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act as unconstitutional and modified the death sentences of appellants to life imprisonment after upholding the voluntariness and admissibility of the confession under Section 164 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant mandatory death penalty Section 27(3) Arms Act Section 164 Cr.P.C. confession voluntariness of confession

Food Corporation of India v. Sarat Chandra Goswami

21 May 2014 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that the disciplinary authority must form a written opinion on the necessity of holding an inquiry under Regulation 60(1)(b) before imposing minor penalties, and failure to do so vitiates the disciplinary proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings Food Corporation of India Regulation 60(1)(b) written opinion

Sompal Singh & Anr. v. State of U.P.

16 May 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC for injuries cumulatively causing death, reduced sentence from 10 to 7 years, and dismissed appeal of one appellant as infructuous.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 IPC Section 302 IPC grievous hurt culpable homicide

Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors. v. State of Gujarat

16 May 2014 · A. K. Patnaik; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions and death sentences of accused in the Akshardham temple terrorist attack, affirming the admissibility of confessional statements under POTA and validity of sanction, dismissing appeals challenging procedural and evidentiary aspects.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Akshardham temple attack Prevention of Terrorism Act confessional statements Section 32 POTA

Chaman Lal v. State of Punjab & Ors.

16 May 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that service in an autonomous society is not government service for pension purposes and dismissed the appeal seeking retiral benefits, emphasizing that Article 14 does not permit perpetuating illegality by extending relief granted through irregular decrees.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pension retiral benefits Fish Farmers Development Agency Societies Registration Act, 1860

KRISHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA

16 May 2014 · Dipak Misra; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape and criminal intimidation, affirming that forensic and medical evidence can prove rape even without external injuries and that the appellant failed to establish juvenile status.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape criminal intimidation forensic evidence medical examination

Jafar Imam Naqvi v. Election Commission of India

15 May 2014 · Dipak Misra; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest writ petition seeking directions against hate speeches during election campaigns, holding that existing laws provide adequate remedies and judicial intervention under Article 32 is unwarranted in this context.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 32 public interest litigation hate speech Election Commission of India

Balram Singh Yadav v. Abhay Kumar Singh

13 May 2014 · Dipak Misra; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that failure to file the latest electoral roll justified rejection of a nomination paper, and thus the High Court erred in invalidating the appellant’s election on grounds of improper rejection.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant improper rejection of nomination Section 33(5) Representation of the People Act Section 100 Representation of the People Act election petition