Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Balu S/o Onkar Pund & Others v. State of Maharashtra

02 Feb 2015 · Dipak Misra; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court altered the appellants' conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-I IPC, holding that there was no intention to kill the deceased during a dispute over cattle shed possession.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC culpable homicide murder

Sahoo Baba v. Haryana Urban Development Authority

02 Feb 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court allowed the appellants to retain possession of a shop allotted by the Haryana Urban Development Authority upon payment of outstanding dues by a specified deadline, failing which possession would be resumed by the Authority.

civil appeal_allowed legal heirs allotment possession unpaid amount

M.V. Jayarajan v. High Court of Kerala & Anr.

30 Jan 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; C. NAGAPPAN
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for criminal contempt for abusive public criticism of a High Court judgment, affirming limits on free speech against the judiciary.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal contempt freedom of speech Article 19(1)(a) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

State of Karnataka v. M/S Pro Lab

30 Jan 2015 · H.L. Dattu; A.K. Sikri; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Entry 25 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act imposing sales tax on processing and supply of photographs, overruling the dominant intention test post the 46th Amendment and validating retrospective taxation.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Sales Tax Act Entry 25 Schedule VI 46th Constitutional Amendment Article 366(29A)

Mount Mary Enterprises v. M/s. Jivratna Medi Treat Pvt. Ltd

30 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court allowed the amendment of plaint to correct undervaluation of suit property, holding that such amendment should not be denied merely due to potential transfer of the suit or belated filing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order 6 Rule 17 CPC specific performance valuation of suit property

Cellular Operators Association of India v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

30 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld TRAI's directive prohibiting differential tariffs by private cellular operators for calls terminating on BSNL/MTNL networks, holding such discrimination unlawful under the Telecommunication Tariff Order and licence conditions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Telecom Regulatory Authority of India differential tariffs non-discrimination direct connectivity

Charulata Behera v. Pravati Parida

30 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised on mere technicalities to perpetuate illegality and restored the appellant's appointment as Anganwadi Worker, emphasizing the mandatory nature of eligibility criteria.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India writ jurisdiction Anganwadi Worker selection eligibility criteria

U.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPN. LTD v. MONSANTO MANUFACTURES (P) LTD.

29 Jan 2015 · SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA; V. GOPALA GOWDA

The Supreme Court held that unauthorized change in shareholding and company structure constituting disposal of controlling interest under lease agreements attracts transfer levy payable to the lessor.

property appeal_allowed Significant transfer levy lease deed memorandum of association articles of association

C. Sukumaran v. State of Kerala

29 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act due to lack of proof of demand of illegal gratification and unreliable evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) illegal gratification

Patel Jathabhai Punajbhai v. North Gujarat University

28 Jan 2015 · H.L. Dattu; A.K. Sikri; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court modified compensation for land acquired for North Gujarat University, holding that market value on the date of notification must be based on comparable sale deeds with reasonable deductions, rejecting reliance on sale deeds from within municipal limits.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 4 notification compensation determination market value

Keshavlal Khemchand and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

28 Jan 2015 · Chelameswar; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the amended definition of Non-Performing Asset under the SARFAESI Act, ruling that adoption of regulatory guidelines by different authorities for asset classification is a permissible legislative delegation and does not violate Article 14.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Non-Performing Asset SARFAESI Act Excessive delegation Article 14

A.C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra; G. Kamalakar v. M/s Surana Securities Ltd.

28 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be validly filed and verified by Power of Attorney holders with personal knowledge, clarifying the scope of Section 142(a) and procedural requirements for such complaints.

criminal appeal_allowed Landmark Power of Attorney Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 142 NI Act

Jage Ram & Ors. v. State of Haryana

28 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC based on credible injured witness and medical evidence, reduced sentences considering custody period, and directed compensation to the victim.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Injured witnesses Medical evidence

Shri Westarly Dkhar & Ors. v. Shri Sehekaya Lyngdoh

28 Jan 2015 · J. Chelameswar; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that appeals against ex-parte interim injunctions granted by Subordinate District Council Courts under the Sixth Schedule Rules are maintainable as a matter of right, applying the spirit rather than the letter of the Code of Civil Procedure.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Sixth Schedule United Khasi-Jaintia Hills Autonomous District Rules, 1953 ex-parte injunction appeal maintainability

Union of India & Another v. Sova Ispat Limited & Others

27 Jan 2015 · Chelameswar; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the Union of India's appeal setting aside the High Court's interim stay on coal block auction, recording an undertaking to protect respondents' property rights pending constitutional adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Second Ordinance, 2014 Article 300A property rights interim order

K.K. SHARMA v. HIGH COURT OF DELHI

22 Jan 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court corrected typographical errors in dates mentioned in its earlier judgment to ensure accuracy of the judicial record.

civil other Procedural correction of judgment clerical error typographical error Supreme Court

Karnail Kaur & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

22 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid for over five years before the Act's commencement, quashing acquisition of appellants' land accordingly.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Lapse of acquisition proceedings

Pathubha Govindji Rathod v. State of Gujarat

21 Jan 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in a group fight, an accused who caused death in excess of private defence without premeditation is liable for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 2 to Section 300 IPC, and accordingly reduced the conviction from murder to Section 304 Part I IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant private defence Exception 2 Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder group fight

DELHI STATE INDUS. DEV. CORPN. LTD. v. ASHOK KUMAR MADAN

21 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; N. V. Ramana · (2001) 1 SCALE 420

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court's quashing of plot allotment cancellation where delayed payments were accepted without objection, establishing that such acceptance creates an equitable right preventing cancellation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant allotment cancellation delayed payment equitable right natural justice

Kuldeep Kumar Dubey & Ors. v. Ramesh Chandra Goyal (D) Th Lrs.

21 Jan 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that a suit by rightful owners is maintainable despite their description as heirs, as such formal defects do not affect the suit's merits or jurisdiction under Section 99 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant maintainability of suit description of parties error or irregularity Section 99 CPC