Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur-I v. M/S. Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd.

21 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that duty drawback benefits accruing to a seller due to buyers surrendering advance licences constitute additional consideration includible in transaction value for excise duty purposes.

tax appeal_allowed Significant additional consideration transaction value duty drawback advance licence

Chitra v. State of Kerala & Ors.

21 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that licensees prevented from utilizing liquor licences for the full year due to court injunctions or extraneous factors are entitled to pay only proportionate licence fees, overruling demands for full annual fees.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Liquor Rules licence fee proportionate payment Actus curiae neminem gravabit

Citibank N.A. v. Hiten P. Dalal & Ors.

21 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that restitution under Section 144 CPC must be based on the market value of bonds at delivery or sale, not on face value at maturity, and set aside the Special Court's order awarding excessive restitution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant restitution Section 144 CPC market value bonds

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rathin Dandapat and others

21 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that police custody remand can be granted to accused arrested during further investigation after filing of the charge sheet, overruling refusals based on Section 309 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant police custody remand further investigation charge sheet Section 167 CrPC

Royal Medical Trust and Another v. Union of India and Another

20 Aug 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that Medical Colleges must be given reasonable opportunity and compliance verification before disapproval under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, and the Central Government may modify the time schedule subject to the admissions deadline.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10A Medical Council of India Medical College permission

Madras Institute of Development Studies and Another v. Dr. K. Sivasubramaniyan and others

20 Aug 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a candidate who participates in a selection process without objection cannot later challenge it, and upheld the appointments made by an autonomous institute, reversing the High Court's interference.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition Article 12 State selection process

Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs v. M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

20 Aug 2015 · R.F. Nariman; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that service tax could not be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to the 2007 Finance Act amendment as the 1994 Act lacked a clear charge and machinery for such taxation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax works contract indivisible contract Finance Act 1994

M/s. Modern Hotel v. Commissioner of Excise

19 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that a partnership firm cannot renew its excise licence if any partner has outstanding abkari arrears, and deposits made towards dues cannot be refunded after lawful appropriation and amnesty.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant partnership firm liability excise licence renewal abkari arrears Foreign Liquor Rules

Sakharam v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

19 Aug 2015 · T.S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi · 2015 INSC 951

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 325 IPC for grievous hurt caused by a fracture but reduced the sentence from seven to three years considering the circumstances of a sudden fight.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant grievous hurt Section 325 IPC fracture of bone judicial discretion in sentencing

Sakharam v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

19 Aug 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for grievous hurt based on bone fracture evidence but reduced the sentence from seven to three years considering the circumstances of a sudden fight.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant grievous hurt Section 325 IPC fracture of bone judicial discretion in sentencing

M/S. ROOTS INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD v. M/S. AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

19 Aug 2015 · ANIL R. DAVE; KURIAN JOSEPH; ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order disposing of a writ petition without considering merits and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, continuing interim relief in the meantime.

civil appeal_allowed writ petition remand merits interim order

Harsarup Panwar v. State of Delhi through CBI

19 Aug 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld imprisonment sentences but conditionally reduced them upon payment of substantial sums for public health projects, considering appellants' age and health.

criminal sentence_modified Significant rigorous imprisonment sentence modification advanced age health conditions

Saroj Kumar v. Union of India

18 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that once adverse ACR entries are communicated and representation rejected, such entries cannot be ignored for promotion, dismissing the appellant's claim to treat them as uncommunicated.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Annual Confidential Report Promotion Communication of adverse entries Representation against ACR

Raj Bala v. State of Haryana

18 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the original sentence under Section 306 IPC, holding that judicial discretion in sentencing must be rational and proportionate, rejecting the High Court's reduction of sentence as unjustified.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide sentencing discretion proportionality in punishment

Selvaraj v. State of Karnataka

18 Aug 2015 · H.L. Dattu; Arun Mishra; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal of the appellant in a bribery case, holding that the High Court erred in reversing acquittal without proper re-appreciation of evidence and that prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Section 5(1)(d) appeal against acquittal demand and acceptance of bribe

Ramvilas v. State of M.P.

18 Aug 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of Ramvilas and others based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite non-recovery of weapon, dismissing the appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC Eyewitness testimony Injured witnesses

M/S. SOORAJMULL NAGARMULL v. STATE OF BIHAR

17 Aug 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1981 lapsed due to failure to pass an Award within the statutory period, invalidated the acquisition, and directed fresh proceedings under the current law.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 11A Section 17 urgency provisions Award lapse

State of Kerala v. M.K. Jose

14 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is generally not the proper forum to adjudicate contractual disputes involving disputed facts and set aside the High Court's order quashing the termination of a public works contract.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction contract termination disputed questions of fact

Stantech Project Engg. Pvt. Ltd. v. Nicco Corporation Ltd.

13 Aug 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Shivakirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that concessions made by counsel regarding payment of admitted debts in winding-up proceedings are binding and set aside the High Court's order allowing the respondent to avoid payment, directing immediate discharge of dues with interest and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant winding-up petition Companies Act 1956 Section 434 concession by counsel

Sunil Khergade v. State of Maharashtra

13 Aug 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction and life sentence of the appellant who inflicted a fatal stab injury on an unarmed deceased, rejecting claims of private defense and lesser culpability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC private defense murder