Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Salma & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.

07 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition seeking protection and recovery of a missing person, directing the petitioners to approach police authorities and file a Habeas Corpus petition in the High Court.

criminal petition_dismissed writ petition threat to life First Information Report Habeas Corpus

ASSOCIATION DELHI v. UNION OF INDIA

07 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court directed the Union of India to decide the petitioners' representation within a stipulated time and disposed of the writ petitions, allowing further legal action if aggrieved.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition representation administrative decision judicial restraint

Arshad @ Syed Ahmed Arshad v. State of Punjab

07 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant upon arrest subject to a substantial monetary deposit and cooperation with the investigation, disposing of the criminal appeal accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed bail monetary deposit criminal appeal cooperation with investigation

State of Haryana & Anr. v. Devander Sagar & Ors.

07 Sep 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of land acquisition proceedings initiated without compliance with mandatory timelines and compensation requirements, emphasizing strict adherence to the Land Acquisition Act, 1984.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1984 Section 4 Notification Section 6 Declaration Urgency provisions

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd v. The Director (Research)

07 Sep 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court set aside the MRTP Commission's cease and desist order against Tata Engineering, holding that demanding booking amounts inclusive of estimated taxes did not constitute unfair trade practice under the MRTP Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Unfair Trade Practice Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 Section 36A Booking amount

Sandu v. Gulab

04 Sep 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that revision under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act can be validly exercised beyond three years with State sanction and remitted the case for fresh consideration with proper parties impleaded.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 Section 4 restoration Section 5A vesting Section 7 revision

Ravindra Kumar Shrivastava v. State of M.P. & Ors.

04 Sep 2015 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of the appellant's promotion to Stenographer for failure to meet the mandatory five-year continuous service requirement as a Steno-typist.

civil appeal_dismissed departmental promotion steno-typist eligibility criteria seniority

State of West Bengal v. R.K.B.K. Ltd.

04 Sep 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that the Director of Consumer Goods has exclusive jurisdiction to pass orders against kerosene oil agents licensed by him, and that orders passed within 30 days but communicated later remain valid, allowing the State's appeal and setting aside the High Court's quashing of the order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant West Bengal Kerosene Oil Control Order, 1968 jurisdiction licence suspension licence cancellation

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI-I v. M/S SEIKO BRUSHWARE INDIA

04 Sep 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that goods exempt from sales tax under the Delhi Sales Tax Act are not eligible for exemption from special additional duty under Customs Notification No. 34/98-Cus, as no tax is chargeable on such goods.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Exemption Notification No. 34/98-Cus special additional duty sales tax exemption Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. v. STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

04 Sep 2015 · RANJAN GOGOI
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a party must follow the agreed procedure of mutual consent for appointing a substitute arbitrator before approaching the Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, and dismissed the petitioner’s premature application.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 15(2) Appointment of arbitrator

Smita Subhash Sawant v. Jagdeeshwari Jagdish Amin

04 Sep 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for filing an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act begins from the date the list under Section 28(k) is available for inspection, and dismissed the petition filed beyond this period as barred by limitation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant election petition limitation period Section 33(1) Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 28(k) Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act

Nizam & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan

04 Sep 2015 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside murder convictions based on incomplete circumstantial evidence and unsafe application of the last seen theory, emphasizing the need for a complete chain of evidence and reasonable explanation by the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Lt. Governor of Delhi v. Matwal Chand

04 Sep 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that evacuee property vests absolutely in the Central Government upon notification under Section 12 of the DPCR Act, ceasing to be evacuee land and thus subject to valid acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

property appeal_allowed Significant evacuee property Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 vesting of property

MUSKAN SAMAJIK EVAM SHIKSHA PRASAR EVAM PRACHAR SAMITI v. UNION OF INDIA

03 Sep 2015 · ANIL R. DAVE; VIKRAMAJIT SEN; UDAY UMESH LALIT
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous following a prior binding judgment, disposing of the petition and pending applications.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition infructuous disposal of petition Supreme Court

Medical Council of India v. Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences

03 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the Medical Council of India's appeal, setting aside the High Court order based on the principles established in the Royal Medical Trust judgment concerning regulation of medical education institutions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India medical education regulation High Court order set aside Royal Medical Trust judgment

Medical Council of India v. Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College

03 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the Medical Council of India's appeal, setting aside the High Court's order in light of its prior judgment in Royal Medical Trust, affirming the binding nature of Supreme Court precedents on medical college regulation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India medical college regulation Supreme Court precedent Royal Medical Trust judgment

Medical Council of India v. Subharti Medical College Meerut

03 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the Medical Council of India's appeal, setting aside the High Court order, reaffirming the regulatory authority's adherence to statutory procedures as per the Royal Medical Trust precedent.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India recognition of medical colleges regulatory authority Royal Medical Trust judgment

Lloyd Electric and Engineering Limited v. State of Himachal Pradesh

03 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a State Government's policy decision to extend a concessional CST rate governs entitlement from the policy date, overriding a later departmental notification's effective date.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Sales Tax Concessional rate Industrial Policy Government policy

Ksh. Lakshaheb Singh v. State of Manipur

02 Sep 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the partial lifting of the ban on direct recruitment for Assistant Engineers in Manipur, directing adherence to vacancy-based quotas and ensuring appellants' consideration for promotion without disturbing the High Court's order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant direct recruitment quota promotion quota vacancies vs cadre strength Articles 14 and 16(1)

K. Nanjappa v. R.A. Hameed alias Ameersab

02 Sep 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decree for specific performance, holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove a valid enforceable contract and that criminal court observations are not conclusive in civil suits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement of sale Indian Evidence Act Section 13 Section 20 Specific Relief Act