Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

L.C. Hanumanthappa v. H.B. Shivakumar

26 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that an amendment adding a declaration of title claim after the limitation period is barred and does not relate back to the original suit date when the defendant had already denied title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation amendment of plaint declaration of title doctrine of relation back

Union of India & Ors. v. 3989606 P, Ex-Naik Vijay Kumar

26 Aug 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that an accidental injury sustained by an army personnel during leave without causal connection to military service does not entitle him to disability pension under Regulation 173.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension military service Regulation 173 Entitlement Rules 1982

Satya Pal Anand v. State of M.P. and Others

25 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that unilateral cancellation of a registered sale deed by a cooperative society is void ab initio and that Registration Authorities lack power to cancel such deeds, directing disputes to be resolved by competent civil or cooperative forums.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Registration Act, 1908 Deed of Extinguishment Cancellation of registered sale deed Section 17(1)(b)

State of Punjab v. M/s. Bandeep Singh & Ors.; Punjab State Leather Development Corporation & Ors. v. Bandeep Singh & Ors.

25 Aug 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that rejection of the highest auction bid above reserve price without contemporaneous valid reasons is arbitrary, directing specific performance upon payment of balance price at prevailing rates.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant auction reserve price administrative decision government discretion

Fireman Ghulam Mustafa v. State of Uttaranchal

25 Aug 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court reduced the appellants' conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 325 IPC, modifying the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 325 IPC Intention to cause death Grievous hurt

State of Rajasthan v. Jainudeen Shekh

25 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that compensation under Section 250 CrPC is not warranted for accused acquitted due to delayed forensic reports absent malice or false implication, setting aside the trial court and High Court orders granting compensation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant compensation Section 250 CrPC malicious prosecution forensic science laboratory

M/S PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

25 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; R.F. Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that cash discounts known at or prior to removal must be deducted in valuing excisable goods under amended Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, remanding other valuation issues for fresh adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 4 valuation transaction value cash discount

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-IV v. Hindustan Lever Ltd.

25 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the classification of Vaseline Intensive Care Heel Guard as a medicament under Chapter 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, emphasizing that therapeutic use and regulatory recognition determine medicament status regardless of minor pharmaceutical ingredient quantities.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Tariff Act medicament classification cosmetic vs medicament therapeutic properties

Vaish Aggarwal Panchayat v. Inder Kumar

25 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that a suit alleging fraud in an earlier decree and filed by a non-party is not barred by res judicata and must be tried on merits rather than dismissed on a summary Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Order 7 Rule 11 CPC specific performance fraud and collusion

A. Prabhakara Reddy & Co. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

24 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the levy of cess under the Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996 on construction works ongoing after the constitution of the Welfare Board, rejecting the appellants' claim that cess could not be levied on contracts executed before the Board's constitution.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996 cess levy retrospective operation fee vs tax

Daljit Singh Grewal v. State of Punjab

21 Aug 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside adverse ACR entries and directing promotion of the appellant to Battalion Commander with consequential benefits, emphasizing communication of adverse entries and adherence to seniority-cum-merit criteria.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report Promotion Benchmark system Senioriy-cum-merit

Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's power to prohibit palm oil imports through Kerala ports under the Foreign Trade Act, holding the notifications valid and not violative of Article 14.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 Section 3 Section 5 Article 14

Vikram Singh @ Vicky v. Union of India

21 Aug 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.K. Agrawal; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity and broad applicability of Section 364A IPC, dismissed the appellants' challenge to their death sentence for kidnapping and murder, and affirmed that judicial discretion in sentencing under this provision is constitutionally permissible.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 364A IPC kidnapping for ransom death penalty constitutional validity

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur-I v. M/S. Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd.

21 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that duty drawback benefits accruing to a seller due to buyers surrendering advance licences constitute additional consideration includible in transaction value for excise duty purposes.

tax appeal_allowed Significant additional consideration transaction value duty drawback advance licence

Chitra v. State of Kerala & Ors.

21 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that licensees prevented from utilizing liquor licences for the full year due to court injunctions or extraneous factors are entitled to pay only proportionate licence fees, overruling demands for full annual fees.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Liquor Rules licence fee proportionate payment Actus curiae neminem gravabit

Citibank N.A. v. Hiten P. Dalal & Ors.

21 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that restitution under Section 144 CPC must be based on the market value of bonds at delivery or sale, not on face value at maturity, and set aside the Special Court's order awarding excessive restitution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant restitution Section 144 CPC market value bonds

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rathin Dandapat and others

21 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that police custody remand can be granted to accused arrested during further investigation after filing of the charge sheet, overruling refusals based on Section 309 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant police custody remand further investigation charge sheet Section 167 CrPC

Royal Medical Trust and Another v. Union of India and Another

20 Aug 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that Medical Colleges must be given reasonable opportunity and compliance verification before disapproval under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, and the Central Government may modify the time schedule subject to the admissions deadline.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10A Medical Council of India Medical College permission

Madras Institute of Development Studies and Another v. Dr. K. Sivasubramaniyan and others

20 Aug 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a candidate who participates in a selection process without objection cannot later challenge it, and upheld the appointments made by an autonomous institute, reversing the High Court's interference.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition Article 12 State selection process

Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs v. M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

20 Aug 2015 · R.F. Nariman; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that service tax could not be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to the 2007 Finance Act amendment as the 1994 Act lacked a clear charge and machinery for such taxation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax works contract indivisible contract Finance Act 1994