Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Munna @ Shambhoo Nath

18 Sep 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to failure of the prosecution to prove the prosecutrix's age below sixteen years and established consensual intercourse.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape consent age of prosecutrix ossification test

Committee for C.R. of C.A.P. & Ors. v. State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors.

17 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court directed the Government of India and Arunachal Pradesh to grant citizenship to eligible Chakma and Hajong tribals settled in the State, affirming their rights under the Citizenship Act and constitutional protections.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Chakma citizenship Hajong tribals Arunachal Pradesh Citizenship Act 1955

Kiran Chander Asri v. State of Haryana

17 Sep 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act but reduced the sentence from two years to one year considering the delay, age, health, and amount involved.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7 Section 13 quantum of punishment

Poonaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Science and Technology Trust v. Medical Council of India

17 Sep 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan · 2015 (9) SCALE 68
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that statutory time schedules for approval of new medical colleges must be strictly followed and dismissed the petitioner's plea for consideration beyond the cut-off date, leaving the final decision to the Central Government based on the Medical Council of India's report.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Medical Council of India Act, 1956 Section 10A Essentiality Certificate Consent of Affiliation

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD v. PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA

16 Sep 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that BSNL, a government-owned company, is not entitled to the 30-year limitation period under Article 112 of the Limitation Act applicable to the Central Government, and dismissed its appeals challenging limitation bar on recovery suits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 112 Central Government Instrumentality

Jitendra Vora v. Bhavana Y. Shah & Anr.

16 Sep 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that prosecution under Section 138 NI Act is not maintainable against individuals without making the partnership firm a party when the liability was not assumed by the firm on whose account the cheque was drawn.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Liability of drawer Partnership firm liability

State (Government of NCT of Delhi) v. Nitin Gunwant Shah

16 Sep 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove the authenticity of a key complaint and establish criminal conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration criminal conspiracy Section 302 IPC Section 120B IPC

Edara Haribabu v. Tulluri Venkata Narasimham

15 Sep 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's interim order removing the appellant from Chairpersonship, holding that suspension of disqualification entitles the member to continue in office until final adjudication of election petitions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disqualification Zilla Praja Parishad party whip interim order

C. Sembiam Sivakumar v. V. Sivachitra Devi

15 Sep 2015 · Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court restored the Family Court's decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty, setting aside the High Court's order, after the respondent accepted permanent alimony and failed to prosecute the appeal.

family appeal_allowed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 permanent alimony

M/S PERIYAR & PAREEKANNI RUBBERS LTD. v. STATE OF KERALA

14 Sep 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that interest is payable on solatium from the date of entitlement under the Land Acquisition Act, overruling the High Court's restriction to post-2001 interest and clarifying that observations in Gurpreet Singh limiting such interest are obiter dicta.

civil appeal_allowed Significant solatium interest on solatium Land Acquisition Act 1894 Sections 23(1A), 23(2), 28, 34

U.P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. v. HYDRO ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES UNION & ANR.

14 Sep 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Arun Mishra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court limited the entitlement of back wages for reinstated workmen to the period from the date of the Labour Court Award, upholding reinstatement but denying back wages from the date of termination.

labor appeal_allowed Significant back wages reinstatement Labour Court Award continuity of service

P. Satyanarayana Murthy v. Dist. Inspector of Police and Anr.

14 Sep 2015 · H.L. Dattu; V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that without proof of demand of illegal gratification, mere recovery of tainted notes cannot sustain conviction under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and accordingly set aside the appellant's conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 illegal gratification proof of demand Section 7

Bhanuben and Anr. v. State of Gujarat

14 Sep 2015 · T. S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld conviction for cruelty under Section 498A IPC but set aside conviction for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC due to lack of evidence, modifying the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide dying declaration

PRAKASH MOTIRAM CHAVAN AND ORS. v. HARICHAND & ORS.

11 Sep 2015 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ARUN MISHRA

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's quashing of reservation for Panchayat Samiti Chairman elections, and permitted the election process to stand completed under a stay, leaving the question of reservation validity open.

administrative appeal_allowed election reservation Panchayat Samiti Chairman

Indore Development Authority v. Atul Tiwari & Anr.

11 Sep 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court directed finalization of the seniority list and mandated the Indore Development Authority to execute lease deeds accordingly, dismissing appeals challenging the consumer forum's allotment orders.

civil appeal_dismissed Indore Development Authority lease deed execution cooperative society allotment seniority list

State of Orissa v. M/s. Samantary Constn. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

11 Sep 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court modified an arbitral award on hire charges for seized machinery, holding compensation cannot exceed machinery value and upheld admissibility of evidence, partially allowing the State's appeal.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 hire charges machinery seizure

AG v. Shiv Kumar Yadav & Anr

10 Sep 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that recall of witnesses after recording accused's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. is an exceptional power to be exercised judicially with cogent reasons, and mere change of counsel or allegations of incompetence do not justify recall, especially in heinous offences requiring expeditious trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. Recall of witnesses Fair trial Ineffective assistance of counsel

Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd.

09 Sep 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that a party not literally named in arbitration agreements may invoke arbitration if it can establish its identity and entitlement, and appointed an arbitrator despite objections on jurisdiction and party description.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator mis-description of parties

J. Thansiama v. State of Mizoram

08 Sep 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to Mizoram post its reorganization, dismissing the appellant's suit as time-barred since the 1966 notification excluding the Act ceased to apply after Mizoram ceased to be part of Assam's tribal areas.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Sixth Schedule tribal areas North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971

Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow University v. Akhilesh Kumar Khare & Anr.

08 Sep 2015 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that casual workers engaged without due process and against unsanctioned posts have no right to regularisation, awarding monetary compensation instead of reinstatement for illegal termination.

labor appeal_partly_allowed Significant regularisation daily wage workers casual employment Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act