Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College v. Medical Council of India & Anr.

31 Aug 2015 · Arun Mishra; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that incomplete applications lacking essentiality certificates submitted beyond the statutory deadline for increasing medical college seats cannot be entertained, emphasizing strict adherence to the time schedule to maintain educational standards.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 essentiality certificate time schedule increase in admission capacity

Standard Chartered Bank v. Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd

28 Aug 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period under Article 91(a) of the Limitation Act for wrongful conversion of bonds begins when the plaintiff first learns the identity of the wrongdoer, setting the limitation start date as 07.11.1992 and allowing the appeal against dismissal on limitation grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 91(a) Limitation Act wrongful conversion specific movable property limitation period

Nanhaku Ram v. State of Jharkhand

28 Aug 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court reduced the sentence of a convicted public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to the mandatory minimum considering his advanced age and serious health conditions, while upholding the conviction and fine.

criminal appeal_allowed Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quantum of sentence reduction of sentence concurrent sentence

State of M.P. v. Mohan Lal

28 Aug 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court modified the reinstatement order of a daily wage employee discontinued 14 years earlier by awarding compensation instead of reinstatement due to the long delay.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act daily wage employee reinstatement compensation in lieu of reinstatement

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh

28 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings involving economic offences like forgery and cheating banks cannot be quashed merely on settlement and repayment, emphasizing the societal impact and sparing use of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings economic offences forgery

M/S Ramchandra Rexines (P) Ltd and Ors. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

28 Aug 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of statutory appeals without merit hearing and directed the High Court to decide the appeals on merits as per the Supreme Court's earlier order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 35-G statutory appeal High Court jurisdiction

S. Panneer Selvam & Ors. v. Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors.

27 Aug 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

In the absence of State policy or rules under Article 16(4A), reserved category candidates promoted earlier do not automatically get consequential seniority, and the 'catch-up rule' applies to maintain seniority of general category candidates.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 16(4A) Constitution of India reservation in promotion consequential seniority catch-up rule

L.C. Hanumanthappa v. H.B. Shivakumar

26 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that an amendment adding a declaration of title claim after the limitation period is barred and does not relate back to the original suit date when the defendant had already denied title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation amendment of plaint declaration of title doctrine of relation back

Union of India & Ors. v. 3989606 P, Ex-Naik Vijay Kumar

26 Aug 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that an accidental injury sustained by an army personnel during leave without causal connection to military service does not entitle him to disability pension under Regulation 173.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension military service Regulation 173 Entitlement Rules 1982

Satya Pal Anand v. State of M.P. and Others

25 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that unilateral cancellation of a registered sale deed by a cooperative society is void ab initio and that Registration Authorities lack power to cancel such deeds, directing disputes to be resolved by competent civil or cooperative forums.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Registration Act, 1908 Deed of Extinguishment Cancellation of registered sale deed Section 17(1)(b)

State of Punjab v. M/s. Bandeep Singh & Ors.; Punjab State Leather Development Corporation & Ors. v. Bandeep Singh & Ors.

25 Aug 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that rejection of the highest auction bid above reserve price without contemporaneous valid reasons is arbitrary, directing specific performance upon payment of balance price at prevailing rates.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant auction reserve price administrative decision government discretion

Fireman Ghulam Mustafa v. State of Uttaranchal

25 Aug 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court reduced the appellants' conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 325 IPC, modifying the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 325 IPC Intention to cause death Grievous hurt

State of Rajasthan v. Jainudeen Shekh

25 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that compensation under Section 250 CrPC is not warranted for accused acquitted due to delayed forensic reports absent malice or false implication, setting aside the trial court and High Court orders granting compensation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant compensation Section 250 CrPC malicious prosecution forensic science laboratory

M/S PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

25 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; R.F. Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that cash discounts known at or prior to removal must be deducted in valuing excisable goods under amended Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, remanding other valuation issues for fresh adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 4 valuation transaction value cash discount

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-IV v. Hindustan Lever Ltd.

25 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the classification of Vaseline Intensive Care Heel Guard as a medicament under Chapter 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, emphasizing that therapeutic use and regulatory recognition determine medicament status regardless of minor pharmaceutical ingredient quantities.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Tariff Act medicament classification cosmetic vs medicament therapeutic properties

Vaish Aggarwal Panchayat v. Inder Kumar

25 Aug 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that a suit alleging fraud in an earlier decree and filed by a non-party is not barred by res judicata and must be tried on merits rather than dismissed on a summary Order 7 Rule 11 CPC application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Order 7 Rule 11 CPC specific performance fraud and collusion

A. Prabhakara Reddy & Co. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

24 Aug 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the levy of cess under the Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996 on construction works ongoing after the constitution of the Welfare Board, rejecting the appellants' claim that cess could not be levied on contracts executed before the Board's constitution.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996 cess levy retrospective operation fee vs tax

Daljit Singh Grewal v. State of Punjab

21 Aug 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside adverse ACR entries and directing promotion of the appellant to Battalion Commander with consequential benefits, emphasizing communication of adverse entries and adherence to seniority-cum-merit criteria.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report Promotion Benchmark system Senioriy-cum-merit

Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Aug 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's power to prohibit palm oil imports through Kerala ports under the Foreign Trade Act, holding the notifications valid and not violative of Article 14.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 Section 3 Section 5 Article 14

Vikram Singh @ Vicky v. Union of India

21 Aug 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.K. Agrawal; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity and broad applicability of Section 364A IPC, dismissed the appellants' challenge to their death sentence for kidnapping and murder, and affirmed that judicial discretion in sentencing under this provision is constitutionally permissible.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 364A IPC kidnapping for ransom death penalty constitutional validity