Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Environment and Consumer Protection Foundation v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional right to dignity of destitute widows in Vrindavan, directing comprehensive State action for their rehabilitation through welfare schemes and institutional reforms under public interest litigation.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 21 public interest litigation widows welfare Vrindavan widows

Union of India & Ors. v. S. Ravichandran & Ors.

11 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Prafulla C. Pant; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the 2003 cadre review superseded the 2000 decision on ministerial cadre promotions in the BSF, dismissing the writ petition and upholding the employer's restructuring authority.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Border Security Force ministerial cadre cadre review promotion quota

Sunder Marketing Associates v. State of Haryana

11 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a mining lease granted to a joint venture cannot be transferred to a single unqualified partner, allowed surrender of the lease subject to compliance with statutory rules, and permitted continuation of mining operations till orderly closure.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant mining lease joint venture transfer of lease surrender of mining contract

Sunder Marketing Associates v. State of Haryana

11 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a mining lease granted to a joint venture cannot be transferred to a single unqualified partner and allowed the petitioner to surrender the lease subject to compliance with statutory rules and conditions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant mining lease joint venture transfer of lease surrender of lease

Suraj Pal v. Ram Manorath

11 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta · 2017 INSC 741

The Supreme Court held that permission of the Settlement Officer under Section 5(c)(ii) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act is not required for sale of land declared 'Chakout' and excluded from the consolidation scheme.

property appeal_dismissed Significant U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act Section 5(c)(ii) Settlement Officer (Consolidation) Chakout land

Suraj Pal v. Ram Manorath

11 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that permission of the Settlement Officer under Section 5(c)(ii) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act is not required for sale of land declared 'Chakout' and excluded from the consolidation scheme.

property appeal_dismissed Significant U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act Section 5(c)(ii) Settlement Officer (Consolidation) Chakout land

A.P. SHOWKATH ALI v. STATE OF KERALA

10 Aug 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court upheld the Government's power under Rule 39 to exempt Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Assistant Sub-Inspectors from passing a prescribed test not conducted for over twelve years, emphasizing equity and justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Rule 39 Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules exemption from test Assistant Sub-Inspector probation Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP v. DEVI SHANKAR

10 Aug 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, upholding the employee's service continuation despite the question of appropriate forum under the Industrial Disputes Act being left open.

labor appeal_dismissed Industrial Disputes Act service continuation civil court jurisdiction employee rights

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. v. Devi Shankar

10 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, upholding the employee's service despite the question of the appropriate forum under the Industrial Disputes Act being left open.

civil appeal_dismissed Industrial Disputes Act service rights civil court jurisdiction employment dispute

J. Vasanthi v. N. Ramani Kanthammal

10 Aug 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2017 INSC 731

The Supreme Court held that a suit by a party seeking to declare sale deeds null and void in substance amounts to cancellation attracting court fee under Section 40 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act and set aside lower courts' orders rejecting the suit for inadequate court fee.

civil appeal_allowed Significant court fee Section 40 Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act Section 25(d) Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act cancellation of sale deed

J. Vasanthi v. N. Ramani Kanthammal

10 Aug 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that a suit by a party to a sale deed seeking to declare it null and void on grounds of fraud attracts court fee under Section 40 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act, and non-payment warrants rejection of the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant court fee Section 40 Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act Section 25(d) Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act cancellation of sale deed

K. NAVEEN KUMAR v. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

10 Aug 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to purge contempt by complying with payment and apology conditions and deferred the arrest order, disposing of the appeal without opining on merits.

civil appeal_allowed contempt of court purging contempt deferral of arrest demand draft

Dharam Pal v. State of Haryana

10 Aug 2017 · L. Nageswara Rao; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of police officers for murder and conspiracy, affirming that credible witness testimony and medical evidence of asphyxia suffice despite delayed disclosure and absence of external injuries.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder asphyxia police misconduct conspiracy

K. Raveendranathan Nair v. Commissioner of Income Tax

10 Aug 2017 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that the court fee payable on appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is determined by the law in force on the date of assessment or appellate order, not the date of filing, and that the amended Kerala court fee provision does not apply retrospectively.

tax appeal_allowed Significant right of appeal court fee Section 260A Income Tax Act Section 52A Kerala Court Fees Act

B. VIJAYA BHARATHI v. P. SAVITRI

10 Aug 2017 · R. F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a suit for specific performance due to plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness throughout, emphasizing that delay and inaction after repudiation disentitle relief under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act agreement to sell

B. VIJAYA BHARATHI v. P. SAVITRI

10 Aug 2017 · R. F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a suit for specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness throughout, emphasizing that such readiness is a mandatory condition under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act agreement to sell

Dr. Abhinav Gupta v. Prof. G.K. Mehta

09 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that substantial compliance with a writ order negates contempt, and directed administrative resolution of residual grievances regarding regularisation and seniority.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contempt proceedings regularisation seniority substantial compliance

State of Uttarakhand v. Mahendra Singh & Ors.

09 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Uttarakhand's civil appeals, upholding the High Court's order allowing an employee to continue in service after over 20 years.

civil appeal_dismissed employee service continuation judicial interference High Court order civil appeal

ASHA EDUCATION SOCIETY v. NANDKISHORE SHRIKRISHNA WANKHEDKAR

09 Aug 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court held that teachers appointed on a year-to-year basis due to temporary course recognition are entitled only to back wages for the remainder of the academic year in which they were terminated following derecognition.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant year-to-year appointment derecognition of course back wages Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977

Ved Prakash v. Muni Lal

09 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the landlord's appeal and remitted the matter to the Rent Controller to provide the tenant suitable accommodation post staircase reconstruction before eviction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant rent petition ejectment tenant accommodation reconstruction