Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

State of Haryana v. Ved Singh

17 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal holding that no further orders were necessary in view of the Modified Demand of Penal Rent dated 26.05.2005.

civil appeal_dismissed Modified Demand of Penal Rent civil appeal penal rent disposal of appeal

Manish Sahu v. Union of India

17 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi · 2017 INSC 767

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging cancellation of selection for HAL trainee posts, holding no interference is warranted where no recruitment or vacancies exist.

civil appeal_dismissed cancellation of selection appointment Hindustan Aeronautics Limited recruitment

Manish Sahu v. Union of India

17 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging cancellation of selection for HAL posts due to non-availability of recruitment, holding no obligation to accommodate candidates in future recruitment.

civil appeal_dismissed cancellation of selection recruitment Hindustan Aeronautics Limited deferred recruitment

Ms. Z v. The State of Bihar

17 Aug 2017 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a major rape victim has the right to terminate pregnancy under the MTP Act without requiring consent of father or husband, condemned State negligence causing delay, and awarded compensation for violation of fundamental rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 termination of pregnancy rape victim consent

Ms. Z v. The State of Bihar

17 Aug 2017 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that delay and negligence by State authorities in facilitating lawful termination of pregnancy of a rape victim violated her rights, awarded compensation, and emphasized the primacy of a mentally capable woman's consent under the MTP Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 reproductive rights rape victim mental retardation

Union of India & Ors. v. Sh. Sarvendra Singh Chauhan & Ors.

17 Aug 2017 · S. A. Bobde; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal of Special (Duty) Allowance for Assam Rifles personnel receiving Risk/Hardship Allowance, ruling that personnel are entitled to only one compensatory allowance as per government orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Special Duty Allowance Risk/Hardship Allowance Assam Rifles Compensatory Allowance

Mohit Chaudhary v. Registry of Supreme Court of India

17 Aug 2017 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud; Sanjay Kishan Ka...

The Supreme Court held that an Advocate-on-Record committed contempt by making false allegations against the Court's Registry and suspended him from practice for one month despite his unconditional apology.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Advocate-on-Record Contempt of Court Bench Hunting Supreme Court Rules 2013

Azizia Bee @ Shaik Mujeeb v. Govt. of A.P.

16 Aug 2017 · R. F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court restored the single Judge's order protecting appellants' title to Survey No. 129/45/D, holding that the Division Bench erred by conflating distinct properties and setting aside the appellants' rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant Survey No. 129/45/D Survey No. 403 part urban land ceiling evacuee proceedings

Priti Patel v. Nalin Satyakam Kohli

16 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial disputes and restrained parties from further litigation to uphold the peace intended by a mutual consent divorce settlement.

family appeal_allowed Significant mutual consent divorce quashing of criminal proceedings restraint on litigation settlement enforcement

Pandurang Dnyandev Hankare v. Rajshree Shahu Government Servants Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

16 Aug 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court directed the respondent bank to pay the undisputed gratuity amount to the appellant pending disposal of writ petitions and urged the High Court to decide the matter expeditiously.

civil appeal_allowed gratuity payment interim relief writ petition Labour Court

TERAPALLI DYVASAHATA KUMAR v. S.M.KANTHA RAJU

16 Aug 2017 · R. F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that under Section 23 of the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001, territorial jurisdiction of the District Court is governed by general Code of Civil Procedure principles and is not confined solely to the Principal District Court of the society's registration place.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 Section 23 District Court jurisdiction Code of Civil Procedure

TERAPALLI DYVASAHATA KUMAR v. S.M.KANTHA RAJU

16 Aug 2017 · R. F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that under Section 23 of the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001, the expression "District Court concerned" includes any District Court with territorial jurisdiction under the CPC, not only the Principal Civil Court of the place of registration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 Section 23 District Court jurisdiction Code of Civil Procedure Section 20

The State of Bihar v. Modern Tent House

16 Aug 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court allowed the defendants' application to amend their written statement during ongoing trial under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, emphasizing the interest of justice and fair trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 6 Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings written statement interest of justice

Lekh Raj v. Ranjit Singh

16 Aug 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a decree final before a retrospective statutory amendment cannot be challenged in execution proceedings on the basis of that amendment and upheld the execution of the decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant execution proceedings finality of decree retrospective amendment Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920

Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam

16 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the extended 90-day detention period under Section 167(2)(a)(i) Cr.P.C. applies only to offences punishable with a minimum of ten years imprisonment, entitling the petitioner to default bail after 60 days when no charge sheet was filed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant default bail Section 167 CrPC imprisonment not less than ten years personal liberty

Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam

16 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the extended 90-day investigation period under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. applies only to offences punishable with a minimum of ten years imprisonment, and the petitioner was entitled to default bail after 60 days as the offence did not meet this threshold.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant default bail Section 167 Cr.P.C. imprisonment not less than ten years personal liberty

G. RAVI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR

16 Aug 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI · 2017 INSC 753

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement and payment under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing the court's discretion to secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act quashing of criminal proceedings amicable settlement

G. RAVI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR

16 Aug 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC following an amicable settlement in a dispute arising under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act quashing of criminal proceedings amicable settlement

Shri Gangajali Education Society v. Union of India

14 Aug 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; D.Y. Chandrachud · 2017 INSC 832

The Supreme Court set aside the MHFW's order barring a medical college from admitting students, holding that administrative authorities must provide tangible reasons when diverging from expert committee findings and allowing the college to admit students for the 2017-18 session.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India Letter of Permission Oversight Committee administrative decision

Environment and Consumer Protection Foundation v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Aug 2017 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta · 2017 INSC 743

The Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right to dignity of destitute widows, directed coordinated government action for their rehabilitation, and emphasized the role of public interest litigation in protecting marginalized groups.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 21 widows' rights public interest litigation rehabilitation