Supreme Court of India
14,826 judgments
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. SHRI KANAIYALAL BALDEVBHAI PATEL
The Supreme Court held that non-intermediary front-running constitutes a fraudulent and unfair trade practice under SEBI's 2003 regulations, allowing SEBI's appeals and reinforcing the broad scope of market integrity protections.
Yashchandra v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of an unregistered, sham lease deed and affirmed that occupancy rights require actual cultivating possession under the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling Act and Land Revenue Code.
Fekan Yadav v. Satendra Yadav
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's anticipatory bail order in a kidnapping case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and proper judicial reasoning before granting bail in serious offences.
M/S. SURENDRA TRADING COMPANY v. M/S. JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT JUTE MILLS COMPANY LTD
The Supreme Court held that the seven-day period for removal of defects in an insolvency application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is directory and not mandatory, allowing discretion to the adjudicating authority to extend time for removal of defects.
Ganpat Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to incomplete and contradictory circumstantial evidence failing to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Ganpat Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
State of Haryana v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax Act cannot be exercised post repeal in closed cases where no proceedings were pending, as the saving clause protects only pending proceedings.
State of Haryana v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed sales tax Act cannot be exercised post repeal unless proceedings were pending on the date of repeal, as the saving clause in the new Act excludes such powers.
State of Haryana v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax statute cannot be exercised post-repeal unless proceedings were pending on the repeal date, as the saving clause in the new Act excludes such powers.
State of Haryana v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed sales tax Act cannot be exercised after repeal if no proceedings were pending, as the saving clause in the new Act excludes such exercise.
The State of Haryana and Others v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax Act cannot be exercised after repeal when no proceedings were pending, as the saving clause in the new Act excludes such exercise.
State of Haryana v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax statute cannot be exercised after repeal unless proceedings were pending on the date of repeal, as the new Act's saving clause excludes such powers.
The State of Bihar v. M/S Smart India Marketing
The Supreme Court stayed the High Court's interim order for de-sealing and release of goods pending expeditious final disposal of the writ petition under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
State of Haryana v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax statute cannot be exercised post-repeal unless proceedings were pending on the date of repeal, overruling suo-moto revision after repeal.
State of Haryana v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax statute cannot be exercised after repeal unless proceedings were pending on the date of repeal, as per the express saving clause in the new Act.
The State of Haryana and Others v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax statute cannot be exercised post repeal when no proceedings were pending, as the repealing Act's saving clause excludes such powers.
The State of Haryana and Others v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed tax statute cannot be exercised post repeal when no proceedings were pending, as the saving clause in the new Act excludes such powers.
The State of Haryana and Others v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed sales tax Act cannot be exercised after repeal when no proceedings were pending, as the saving clause in the new Act excludes such exercise.
The State of Haryana and Others v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that revisional powers under a repealed sales tax Act cannot be exercised after repeal if no proceedings were pending on the repeal date, as the new Act's saving clause excludes such actions.