Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences v. Medical Council of India

21 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that approval for increased MBBS intake requires rectification of deficiencies and fresh inspection, dismissing the petition for the 2017-18 academic year and directing consideration for 2018-19.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Medical Council of India increased intake MBBS seats Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Mangalam Publications (I) Private Limited

21 Sep 2017 · Arun Mishra; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2017 INSC 973

The Supreme Court held that interim relief paid to employees constitutes wages under the ESI Act, making the employer liable to pay ESI contributions on such amounts.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees State Insurance Act Section 2(22) wages definition interim relief

Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Mangalam Publications (I) Private Limited

21 Sep 2017 · Arun Mishra; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that interim relief paid to employees constitutes wages under Section 2(22) of the ESI Act, making the employer liable to pay ESI contributions on such amounts.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees State Insurance Act Section 2(22) wages definition interim relief

Indian Centre for Advancement of Research and Education v. Union of India

21 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar · 2017 INSC 969
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Medical Council of India's authority to conduct surprise inspections and deny recognition to a medical college for non-compliance, dismissing allegations of mala fide and arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Medical Council of India Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10-A Section 11(2)

Indian Centre for Advancement of Research and Education v. Union of India

21 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Medical Council of India's authority to conduct surprise inspections and deny renewal of permission and recognition to a medical college found deficient, dismissing the petition challenging the decision as mala fide.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Medical Council of India Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10-A Section 11(2)

Mobilox Innovations Private Limited v. Kirusa Software Private Limited

21 Sep 2017 · R.F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2017 INSC 975

The Supreme Court clarified that a bona fide dispute raised by a corporate debtor bars insolvency proceedings by an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and mandated proper examination of such disputes by adjudicating authorities.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 operational creditor operational debt dispute

Mobilox Innovations Private Limited v. Kirusa Software Private Limited

21 Sep 2017 · R.F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court clarified that a bona fide dispute raised within ten days bars insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and operational creditors must comply with procedural requirements including furnishing a certificate from financial institutions.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 operational creditor dispute Section 8

Cyrus Rustom Patel v. The Charity Commissioner Maharashtra, State & Ors.

21 Sep 2017 · Arun Mishra; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that the Charity Commissioner must ensure trust property is alienated in the Trust's best interest, setting aside a private sale sanctioned without public notice or market value consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Public Trusts Act 1950 Section 36 Charity Commissioner alienation of trust property

Cyrus Rustom Patel v. The Charity Commissioner Maharashtra, State & Ors.

21 Sep 2017 · Arun Mishra; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that the Charity Commissioner must ensure trust property alienation under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act is transparent, bona fide, and in the best interest of the trust, setting aside a private negotiated sale at a throw-away price without public notice or market valuation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Public Trusts Act 1950 Section 36 Charity Commissioner Trust property alienation

M/S SHANTI FRAGRANCES v. UNION OF INDIA

21 Sep 2017 · R.F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question whether a notification prescribing a tax rate can override an exemption notification under sales tax laws and clarified issues relating to the doctrine of precedent in conflicting judgments.

tax other Significant sales tax exemption notification tax rate

K.R. Babu v. State of Kerala

21 Sep 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that seniority in public service appointments advised by the Commission is determined by the effective date of advice, not the date of appointment, and upheld the High Court's order revising T. Raju's seniority accordingly.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant seniority effective date of advice appointment Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Shri Kanaiyalal Baldevbhai Patel

20 Sep 2017 · N. V. Ramana; Ranjan Gogoi · 2017 INSC 966
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-intermediary front-running constitutes a fraudulent and unfair trade practice under SEBI's FUTP Regulations, 2003, allowing SEBI's appeals and upholding penalties against violators.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant front-running non-intermediary fraudulent trade practice Securities and Exchange Board of India

Thuluva Vellalar Sangam v. R. Manthrasalam

20 Sep 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court disposed of a civil appeal concerning execution barred by limitation by recording a settlement between parties and granting time to vacate the property.

civil appeal_allowed execution of decree limitation civil suit compromise

Abdul Hamid v. Union of India

20 Sep 2017 · Deepak Gupta; Madan B. Lokur · 2017 INSC 961

The Supreme Court held that restricting Railway fresh face substitute appointments exclusively to Railway-trained apprentices violates Articles 14 and 16, dismissed the appeals challenging termination, and directed age relaxation for participation in ongoing recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant fresh face substitutes apprenticeship training Article 14 Article 16

Abdul Hamid v. Union of India

20 Sep 2017 · Deepak Gupta; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that restricting Railway recruitment of fresh face substitutes exclusively to Railway-trained apprentices violates Articles 14 and 16, dismissing the appeals and directing a fair, open selection process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 14 Article 16 fresh face substitutes Railway apprenticeship

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. SHRI KANAIYALAL BALDEVBHAI PATEL

20 Sep 2017 · N. V. Ramana; Ranjan Gogoi · 2017 INSC 965
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-intermediary front-running constitutes a fraudulent and unfair trade practice under SEBI Regulations, 2003, and allowed SEBI's appeals against exonerations by the Appellate Tribunal.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant front-running non-intermediary fraudulent trade practice unfair trade practice

SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LIMITED v. TUFF DRILLING PRIVATE LIMITED

20 Sep 2017 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an arbitral tribunal terminating proceedings under Section 25(a) retains jurisdiction to recall its order and recommence arbitration on sufficient cause shown by the claimant.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 25(a) Termination of arbitration proceedings Recall of arbitral tribunal order

SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LIMITED v. TUFF DRILLING PRIVATE LIMITED

20 Sep 2017 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an arbitral tribunal terminating proceedings under Section 25(a) retains jurisdiction to recall its order on sufficient cause, dismissing the appeal and directing reconsideration of the claimant's application.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 25(a) Termination of arbitration proceedings Recall of arbitral tribunal order

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. SHRI KANAIYALAL BALDEVBHAI PATEL

20 Sep 2017 · N. V. Ramana; Ranjan Gogoi · 2017 INSC 964
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that front-running by non-intermediaries constitutes a fraudulent and unfair trade practice under SEBI Regulations, 2003, and upheld SEBI's penalties against such violations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant front-running non-intermediary fraudulent trade practice unfair trade practice

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. SHRI KANAIYALAL BALDEVBHAI PATEL

20 Sep 2017 · N. V. Ramana; Ranjan Gogoi · 2017 INSC 963
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-intermediary front-running constitutes a fraudulent and unfair trade practice under SEBI Regulations, 2003, allowing SEBI's appeals and reinforcing market integrity protections.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant front-running non-intermediary front-running fraudulent trade practice unfair trade practice