Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Mauvin Godinho v. State of Goa

17 Jan 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 28
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the framing of charges against public servants and company officials for criminal conspiracy and corruption in relation to illegal power tariff rebates, emphasizing the prima facie standard at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charges prima facie case Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 criminal conspiracy

Mauvin Godinho v. State of Goa

17 Jan 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the framing of charges against public servants for criminal conspiracy and corruption in granting illegal power tariff rebates, emphasizing the prima facie standard at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charges prima facie case Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 criminal conspiracy

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Trilok Chand & Anr

17 Jan 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 29

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused under the NDPS Act due to major contradictions in prosecution evidence and procedural lapses, emphasizing the need for strict proof in narcotics cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20 NDPS contradictions in prosecution evidence benefit of doubt

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Trilok Chand & Anr

17 Jan 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused under the NDPS Act due to major contradictions in prosecution evidence, emphasizing the need for stringent proof in narcotics cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20 NDPS contradictions in prosecution evidence benefit of doubt

Commissioner of Central Excise Belgaum v. M/s. Vasavadatta Cements Ltd.

17 Jan 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 30

The Supreme Court upheld the admissibility of CENVAT credit on transportation services from the place of removal to depots or customers under the unamended CENVAT Credit Rules, dismissing the Department's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CENVAT credit input service goods transport agency service place of removal

Commissioner of Central Excise Belgaum v. M/s. Vasavadatta Cements Ltd.

17 Jan 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the allowance of CENVAT credit on transportation services from the place of removal to depots or customers under the unamended CENVAT Credit Rules, dismissing the Department's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CENVAT credit input service transportation service place of removal

SHAIKH OSMANALI CHOUS v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR

16 Jan 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; AMITAVA ROY

The Supreme Court restored the Commissioner’s compensation award for permanent disability, holding that the High Court erred in arbitrarily reducing it without valid legal grounds.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen's Compensation permanent physical disability loss of earning capacity compensation award

Shaikh Osmanali Chous v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

16 Jan 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court restored the full compensation awarded by the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, holding that the High Court erred in arbitrarily reducing it without substantial legal basis.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen's Compensation permanent physical disability loss of earning capacity compensation award

Rishal & Ors. v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission

16 Jan 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 449

The Supreme Court upheld the expert committee's revised answer keys and directed the Rajasthan Public Service Commission to revise results and fill vacant posts without disturbing already made appointments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant answer key correctness judicial review expert committee examination results revision

Rishal & Ors. v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission

16 Jan 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld expert committee revisions to examination answer keys, directed result revision excluding already selected candidates, and mandated appointments against vacant posts to ensure fairness in the Rajasthan School Lecturer recruitment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant answer key judicial review expert committee examination results

K.A. Annamma v. Secretary, Cochin Co-operative Hospital Society Ltd.

12 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that service disputes between cooperative society employees and employers are triable under both the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and the Industrial Disputes Act concurrently, allowing the employee to choose the forum, and set aside the High Court judgment excluding Labour Court jurisdiction.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 concurrent jurisdiction service dispute

K.A. Annamma v. Secretary, Cochin Co-operative Hospital Society Ltd.

12 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that service disputes between cooperative society employees and employers are triable under both the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and the Industrial Disputes Act concurrently, allowing the employee to choose the forum, and set aside the High Court judgment excluding Labour Court jurisdiction.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 concurrent jurisdiction service dispute

Kuki Ravindran v. Chendrimada Somaya Madappa

11 Jan 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, disposing of all pending civil and criminal proceedings between the parties pursuant to their settlement.

family appeal_allowed Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13B mutual consent divorce matrimonial dispute

Russel Joy v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Jan 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court directed the constitution of specialized disaster management sub-committees for the Mullaperiyar Dam to ensure preparedness and uphold the right to life, while affirming the dam's current safety status.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Mullaperiyar Dam Disaster Management Act, 2005 Article 21 Article 32

Russel Joy v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Jan 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court directed the constitution of exclusive disaster management sub-committees for Mullaperiyar Dam to ensure preparedness against unforeseen disasters, while affirming the dam's safety and dismissing the petition for its decommissioning.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Mullaperiyar Dam Disaster Management Act 2005 Article 21 Dam safety

Tripurari Sharan and Anr. v. Ranjit Kumar Yadav & Ors.

11 Jan 2018 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals against the High Court's order, affirming the correctness of the impugned decision and exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136.

civil appeal_dismissed Special Leave Petition High Court order Appeal dismissal Article 136 Constitution of India

M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited v. Northern Coal Field Limited

11 Jan 2018 · Indu Malhotra; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that under the 2015 Amendment to the Arbitration Act, the High Court's power under Section 11 is limited to examining the existence of an arbitration agreement, and issues like limitation must be decided by the arbitral tribunal, setting aside the High Court's rejection of arbitrator appointment on limitation grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 16 Limitation

Urmila Devi and Others v. The Deity, Mandir Shree Chamunda Devi, Through Temple Commissioner and Others

10 Jan 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 16

The Supreme Court held that when specific performance becomes impossible due to land acquisition, the plaintiff is entitled to compensation under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, and directed part of the acquisition compensation be awarded to the plaintiff despite the gift deed being declared void.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance Section 21 Specific Relief Act land acquisition compensation

Urmila Devi and Others v. The Deity, Mandir Shree Chamunda Devi

10 Jan 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that when specific performance becomes impossible due to land acquisition, the plaintiff is entitled to compensation equivalent to acquisition award, and a void gift deed confers no right to such compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance compensation land acquisition Section 21 Specific Relief Act

I.C. Sharma v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

10 Jan 2018 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court clarified the principle of under-insurance in householder policies, holding that full insured sums are payable when all items under a category are lost, and insurers cannot reject claims solely for lack of invoices under consolidated sum policies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant under-insurance principle of averaging householder insurance policy insurance claim