Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Flora Elias Nahoum & Ors. v. Idrish Ali Laskar

25 Jan 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court allowed the landlord's appeal, holding that sub-letting without landlord's consent was proved, thereby justifying eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction sub-letting West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 exclusive possession

Mst. Anusuiya @ Saraswatibai & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh

25 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for dowry-related cruelty and abetment of suicide but modified sentences considering the accused's circumstances and period already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Section 498A IPC dowry harassment abetment of suicide

Jayaprakash v. T.S. David

25 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2018 INSC 61

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's remand of a specific performance suit for fresh trial due to procedural irregularities in setting aside an ex parte decree without proper notice to all defendants.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant ex parte decree Order 9 Rule 13 CPC specific performance notice

Jayaprakash v. T.S. David

25 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's remand of a suit for specific performance due to procedural irregularities in setting aside an ex parte decree without proper notice, directing a fresh trial on merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance ex parte decree Order 9 Rule 13 CPC setting aside ex parte decree

N.C. Bansal v. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation

25 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2018 INSC 62

The Supreme Court held that applications for amendment of plaint and filing additional documents should be liberally allowed at the initial stage of a civil suit, especially after remand, to ensure fair trial and justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order 6 Rule 17 CPC filing additional documents Order 7 Rule 14 CPC

N.C. Bansal v. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation

25 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal permitting amendment of the plaint and filing of additional documents at the initial stage of the suit, emphasizing a liberal approach by courts in such matters.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order 7 Rule 14 CPC Order 6 Rule 17 CPC filing additional documents

H.V. Nirmala v. R. Sharmila

25 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2018 INSC 60

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the plaintiff proved the registered Will dated 12.03.1980, rendering the later Will and compromise decree non-binding on her.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will Registered Will Proof of Will Section 68 Evidence Act

H.V. Nirmala v. R. Sharmila

25 Jan 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the plaintiff proved the registered Will dated 12.03.1980 by secondary evidence, rendering the later Will and compromise decree non-binding on her.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant registered Will secondary evidence Section 68 Evidence Act compromise decree

Issac @ Kishor v. Ronald Cheriyan and Ors.

23 Jan 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi · 2018 INSC 48

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside the acquittal and ordering retrial due to procedural defects materially affecting the trial, emphasizing that retrial under Section 386 Cr.P.C. is warranted only in exceptional cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 386 CrPC order of acquittal retrial glaring defect

ISSAC @ KISHOR v. RONALD CHERIYAN

23 Jan 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside the acquittal and ordering retrial due to procedural defects including failure to frame charges under Section 34 IPC and non-examination of key witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal retrial Section 386 CrPC common intention

Dashrath @ Jolo v. State of Chhattisgarh

23 Jan 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder under Sections 302 and 149 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and recovery of weapons, dismissing claims of self-defense and failure to explain injuries.

criminal appeal_dismissed unlawful assembly Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC injured eyewitness

The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Nande @ Nandkishore Singh

23 Jan 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt amid contradictory evidence and procedural delays.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant culpable homicide attempt to murder reasonable doubt eyewitness testimony

The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Nande @ Nandkishore Singh

23 Jan 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a burn injury case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt amid contradictory evidence and unexplained delays.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 304 Part I IPC Section 307 IPC Section 302 IPC culpable homicide

M/S INDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZER CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED v. M/S BHADRA PRODUCTS

23 Jan 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that an arbitral award deciding limitation is an interim award challengeable under Section 34 and does not constitute a jurisdictional ruling under Section 16 requiring continuation of arbitration before challenge.

other appeal_allowed Significant interim award arbitral award limitation Section 34 Arbitration Act

M/S INDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZER CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED v. M/S BHADRA PRODUCTS

23 Jan 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that an arbitral award deciding limitation is an interim award challengeable under Section 34 and does not constitute a jurisdictional ruling under Section 16 requiring continuation of arbitration before challenge.

other appeal_allowed Significant interim award arbitral award limitation jurisdiction

Subhadra v. Ministry of Coal and Anr.

23 Jan 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that under a Bipartite Agreement, a female dependant below 45 years has a right to opt for employment over monetary compensation, and directed appointment and compensation accordingly.

labor appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment Bipartite Agreement female dependant monetary compensation

Lachhman Dass v. Resham Chand Kaler

23 Jan 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders in a serious murder and conspiracy case, emphasizing equal treatment under law and the necessity of prudent legal scrutiny before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail criminal conspiracy murder Section 439 CrPC

ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD v. RABI SANKAR PATRO

22 Jan 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit · 2018 INSC 44

The Supreme Court clarified that engineering degrees awarded by Deemed to be Universities through distance education without AICTE approval are invalid unless validated by a test, granting a one-time relaxation to certain candidates while excluding diplomas from the judgment.

education appeal_allowed Significant Deemed to be University distance education engineering degrees AICTE

ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD v. RABI SANKAR PATRO

22 Jan 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court clarified that engineering degrees awarded through distance education by unapproved Deemed to be Universities are invalid, mandated AICTE testing for validation, excluded diplomas from the judgment, and granted a one-time limited relaxation to certain candidates.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Deemed to be Universities distance education engineering degrees AICTE

Nachhatar Singh v. The State of Punjab

22 Jan 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court dismissed civil appeals against the State of Punjab by relying on an earlier judgment, directing payment of compensation and emphasizing finality in litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Special Leave Petition compensation State liability finality of judgment