Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Shivaji Yallappa Patil v. Sri Ranajeet Appasaheb Patil

16 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of specific performance to plaintiffs in possession under an agreement to sell, emphasizing judicial discretion and protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance Section 20 Specific Relief Act Section 53A Transfer of Property Act possession

Shivaji Yallappa Patil v. Sri Ranajeet Appasaheb Patil

16 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's discretionary grant of specific performance based on possession and part performance under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, dismissing the appeal of a subsequent purchaser.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance Section 20 Specific Relief Act Section 53A Transfer of Property Act part performance

IBI Consultancy India Private Limited v. DSC Limited

16 Apr 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 349

The Supreme Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that a valid arbitration agreement existed and the court's role is limited to verifying its existence without examining merits.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act International Commercial Arbitration Appointment of Arbitrator

IBI Consultancy India Private Limited v. DSC Limited

16 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that a valid arbitration agreement exists and limiting judicial scrutiny to its existence in an international commercial arbitration dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment International commercial arbitration Arbitration agreement

Mohd. Ali v. State of H.P.

16 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court held that a workman must have worked 240 days in the 12 months preceding dismissal to claim protection under Sections 25F and 25B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and dismissed the appeal for failure to meet this condition.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F Section 25B continuous service

Navaneethakrishnan v. The State

16 Apr 2018 · A.K. Sikri; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and inadmissibility of retracted confessions, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of evidence for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence retracted confession Section 27 Evidence Act last seen theory

Manimegalai v. Special Tahsildar

16 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court restored the Reference Court's higher compensation award for land acquisition, emphasizing fair market value assessment considering potential use and location.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value public purpose

Mohammad Yusuf v. State of Haryana

16 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's enhanced compensation award with a 10% development charge deduction for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing just and adequate compensation based on proximate bonafide sale deeds and reasonable deductions.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation Development charges Market value

Mohammad Yusuf v. State of Haryana

16 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld enhanced compensation for land acquisition, affirming that compensation must reflect bona fide market value with reasonable development deductions, balancing landowner rights and public interest.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value development charges

Hemraj Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh

13 Apr 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition on delay grounds and remanded the case for fresh consideration of substantive averments regarding land possession.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ petition delay and laches land acquisition possession of land

M/s Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd v. M/s Oswal Agro Mills Ltd

13 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an umpire in arbitration need not conduct a de novo hearing unless timely requested, and failure to do so amounts to waiver, thereby upholding the arbitration award and dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Umpire powers De novo hearing Waiver by conduct

M/s Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd v. M/s Oswal Agro Mills Ltd

13 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an umpire appointed due to arbitrators' disagreement need not conduct a de novo hearing unless timely requested, and upheld the arbitration award dismissing the appellant's belated challenge.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration Act 1940 Umpire powers De novo hearing Waiver by conduct

Commissioner of Central Excise v. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt. Ltd.

13 Apr 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that coconut oil packed in small containers is classifiable under Heading 1513 as edible oil and not under Heading 3305 as hair oil, emphasizing statutory headings and HSN over consumer perception or packaging.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 coconut oil classification Heading 1513 Heading 3305

Union Public Service Commission v. M. Sathiya Priya and others

13 Apr 2018 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that the expert Selection Committee's grading and promotion decisions under the IPS Regulations are final barring malice or arbitrariness, setting aside the CAT and High Court orders directing appointment of a superseded officer.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Selection Committee IPS promotion Annual Confidential Reports Judicial review

Union Public Service Commission v. M. Sathiya Priya and others

13 Apr 2018 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that the expert Selection Committee's grading and promotion decisions to the IPS are subject to limited judicial review and set aside the CAT and High Court orders directing appointment of the first respondent.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Selection Committee IPS promotion Annual Confidential Reports Judicial review

Shiva Kant Jha v. Union of India

13 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 339

The Supreme Court held that a retired government servant is entitled to full reimbursement of genuine emergency medical expenses under CGHS even if treated at a non-empanelled hospital without prior approval, and directed timely claim disposal mechanisms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Central Government Health Scheme medical reimbursement retired government servants emergency medical treatment

Shiva Kant Jha v. Union of India

13 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that pensioners are entitled to full reimbursement of genuine emergency medical expenses under CGHS even if treated at non-empanelled hospitals, and mandated timely disposal of claims to protect their fundamental rights.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Central Government Health Scheme medical reimbursement retired government servants emergency medical treatment

K.K. Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

13 Apr 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that prosecution for defamation under Section 199(2) Cr.P.C. requires a reasonable nexus with official duties and independent satisfaction by the Public Prosecutor, quashing a conviction where these conditions were not met.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant defamation Section 199(2) Cr.P.C. public prosecutor duty sanction for prosecution

K.K. Mishra v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

13 Apr 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that prosecution for defamation under Section 199(2) Cr.P.C. requires a reasonable nexus with official duties and independent scrutiny by the Public Prosecutor, quashing the conviction where these were absent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 199(2) Cr.P.C. defamation public prosecutor duty sanction for prosecution

Commissioner of Central Excise v. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt. Ltd.

13 Apr 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that coconut oil packed in small containers is classifiable under Heading 1513 as edible oil and not under Heading 3305 as hair oil, emphasizing statutory tariff provisions and HSN over consumer perception.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 coconut oil classification Heading 1513 Heading 3305