Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Oil Industries & Anr. v. Forest Range Officer Kasargod & Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that confiscation of sandalwood oil under Sections 61A or 69 of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961 was not legally valid prior to the 2010 amendment and set aside the confiscation order.

property appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Forest Act, 1961 Section 61A Section 69 confiscation

Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to withdraw civil appeals and dismissed them as withdrawn without adjudicating on the merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural withdrawal of appeal civil appeal Supreme Court dismissal as withdrawn

Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court permitted the appellant to withdraw civil appeals and dismissed them as withdrawn without adjudicating on the merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural withdrawal of appeal civil appeal Supreme Court of India dismissal as withdrawn

Suresh Kumar Kohli v. Rakesh Jain

19 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that tenancy rights of a deceased tenant devolve on heirs as joint tenants under the Delhi Rent Control Act, making eviction against one joint tenant binding on all heirs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant joint tenancy tenancy-in-common Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Suresh Kumar Kohli v. Rakesh Jain

19 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that tenancy rights under the Delhi Rent Control Act devolve on heirs as joint tenants, allowing eviction proceedings against one joint tenant to bind all heirs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant joint tenancy tenancy-in-common Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Mangammal Thulasi and Anr. v. T.B. Raju and Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

Daughters married before the 1989 Tamil Nadu amendment are not coparceners entitled to partition ancestral property but can claim their share by succession, while sale deeds executed by the brother stand valid.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989 coparcenary rights partition suit ancestral property

Rabari Prabhatbhai Gugubhai v. State of Gujarat

19 Apr 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha · 2018 INSC 378

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals directing the appointment of selected candidates to available Driver vacancies in Gujarat Subordinate Courts, emphasizing proper application of option in selection.

civil appeal_allowed appointment selection process option in selection Driver posts

Mahaveer Kumar Jain v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur

19 Apr 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that lottery income earned in Sikkim before the IT Act's extension to the state is taxable only under Sikkim's tax laws, preventing double taxation under the IT Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Sikkim State Income Tax Rules, 1948 Article 371F Double taxation

Rabari Prabhatbhai Gugubhai v. State of Gujarat

19 Apr 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court allowed appeals directing appointment of selected candidates as drivers in subordinate courts by considering all options for district preference and adjusting them against available vacancies.

civil appeal_allowed appointment of drivers option system district preference subordinate courts

Sisters of St. Joseph of Cluny v. State of West Bengal

18 Apr 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the NCMEI has original jurisdiction under Section 11(f) of the 2004 Act to declare minority educational institution status, validating the minority status certificate of Cluny Women's College.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 minority educational institution Section 10 Section 11(f)

Shanker v. State of Madhya Pradesh

18 Apr 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 359

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant proof beyond reasonable doubt contradictions in prosecution evidence quality of evidence benefit of doubt

Shanker v. State of Madhya Pradesh

18 Apr 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence, emphasizing the necessity of trustworthy evidence to uphold conviction beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant proof beyond reasonable doubt contradictory evidence benefit of doubt Sections 302 and 148 IPC

Seema Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation

18 Apr 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of bail in a murder case, emphasizing judicial discretion, the inconclusive nature of expert reports at bail stage, and the presumption of innocence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail murder Section 302 IPC Section 498-A IPC

Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority v. Backbone Enterprises Limited

18 Apr 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over public works contract disputes under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, overruling prior conflicting precedent and setting aside orders directing arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 exclusive jurisdiction arbitration tribunal Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority v. Backbone Enterprises Limited

18 Apr 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that disputes arising from public works contracts in Madhya Pradesh fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, overruling prior conflicting precedent and setting aside High Court orders directing arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 exclusive jurisdiction public works contract disputes

Sureshchandra Bagmal Doshi v. The New India Assurance Company Limited

18 Apr 2018 · Chelameswar; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation for loss of dependency in a motor accident claim by affirming a 100% increase for future prospects based on evidence and a 50% deduction for personal expenses, applying the appropriate multiplier and conventional heads.

civil appeal_allowed Significant future prospects loss of dependency personal expenses deduction multiplier

M. Durga Singh & Ors. v. Yadagiri & Ors.

18 Apr 2018 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of land grabbing claims by the appellants, emphasizing the exclusive jurisdiction of the Special Court under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing Act and rejecting prolonged civil litigation without proof of ownership.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land grabbing exclusive jurisdiction special court Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982

Union of India & Ors. v. Cdr. Ravindra V. Desai

18 Apr 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's findings of guilt and modified sentence against a naval officer for making obscene calls, affirming the admissibility of call data records and the Tribunal's powers to summon evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Court Martial Call Data Record Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act Armed Forces Tribunal

Union of India v. Cdr. Ravindra V. Desai

18 Apr 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's finding of guilt against a naval officer for obscene calls based on reliable electronic evidence and modified punishment from dismissal to forfeiture of seniority, ordering reinstatement without back wages.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Court Martial Armed Forces Tribunal Call Data Records Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act

Dinesh Singh Thakur v. Sonal Thakur

17 Apr 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi · 2018 INSC 356

The Supreme Court held that an anti-suit injunction restraining foreign divorce proceedings cannot be granted lightly and dismissed the husband's appeal to restrain the wife's divorce petition filed in the USA.

family appeal_dismissed Significant anti-suit injunction Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Specific Relief Act, 1963 foreign divorce proceedings