Supreme Court of India
14,826 judgments
Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore v. M/S Grasim Industries Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that excise duty valuation under the Central Excise Act includes all value additions up to clearance, including ancillary charges, affirming the transaction value concept and resolving conflicts between prior decisions.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD
The Supreme Court held that excise duty valuation under the Central Excise Act includes all value additions up to clearance, including various ancillary charges, affirming the transaction value concept introduced in 2000 and resolving conflicts with earlier decisions.
Kumar v. State
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to unexplained injuries on the accused, police irregularities, and failure of the prosecution to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Kumar v. State
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to unexplained injuries on the accused, delay in FIR registration, and irregularities in police investigation undermining the prosecution case.
Bilquis v. The State of Maharashtra & Others
The Supreme Court restored enhanced compensation for acquired irrigated land and fruit bearing orange trees, modifying the multiplier for tree valuation, and set aside the High Court's reduction of compensation.
Vijay Arjun Bhagat v. Nana Laxman Tapkire
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment for procedural non-compliance with Section 100 CPC and remanded the second appeal for fresh decision on merits.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD
The Supreme Court held that ancillary charges related to containers are includible in the transaction value for excise duty under the Central Excise Act, affirming that the measure of levy is not confined to manufacturing cost and profit but includes all value additions up to clearance.
Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that passing the departmental Hindi examination is not a mandatory condition for confirmation under the Jharkhand Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004, and directed grant of all service benefits to the appellants accordingly.
Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that under the Jharkhand Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004, passing the departmental Hindi examination is not a mandatory condition for confirmation, overruling the High Court's contrary interpretation and entitling appellants to increments and old pension benefits.
Sheila Sebastian v. R. Jawaharaj & Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused for forgery under Section 465 IPC, holding that mere benefit from a forged document without making it does not constitute forgery.
Sheila Sebastian v. R. Jawaharaj & Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a forgery case, ruling that conviction under Section 465 IPC requires proof that the accused themselves made the false document as defined under Section 464 IPC.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD
The Supreme Court held that excise duty valuation under the Central Excise Act includes all value additions up to clearance, including ancillary charges, affirming the transaction value concept and resolving conflicts in earlier precedents.
Raj Kumar Gandhi v. Chandigarh Administration
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition under Scheme No.3, holding that periods of court stay must be excluded in computing the statutory time for passing awards and that approval by delegated authority with ex post facto sanction is valid.
Raj Kumar Gandhi v. Chandigarh Administration
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition award passed within the statutory period excluding court-ordered stays and approved by a delegated authority, dismissing challenges to the acquisition under Scheme No.3, Pocket No.8.
Shamo Devi v. The State of Haryana
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments and remanded multiple connected civil appeals for joint reconsideration.
Shamo Devi v. The State of Haryana
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments and remanded the connected civil appeals for consolidated reconsideration to ensure efficient judicial administration.
DTC SECURITY STAFF UNION v. DTC
The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision setting aside an Industrial Tribunal Award granting pay parity to DTC security staff with Delhi Police, emphasizing that pay-scale fixation is primarily a government function and Tribunals must exercise restraint.
DTC SECURITY STAFF UNION v. DTC AND ANOTHER
The Supreme Court held that pay-scale fixation is a technical matter for Pay Commissions and government authorities, and tribunals should not interfere by granting pay parity without proper basis, dismissing the appeal challenging the denial of pay parity to certain security staff of DTC.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD
The Supreme Court held that excise duty valuation under the Central Excise Act includes permissible value additions beyond manufacturing cost, affirming the concept of 'transaction value' and clarifying the interplay between Sections 3 and 4.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD
The Supreme Court held that all charges related to containers and ancillary services are includible in the transaction value for excise duty under the Central Excise Act, affirming that the measure of levy extends beyond manufacturing cost and profit.