Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

GURMEET PAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

15 May 2018 · Chelameswar; Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 2008 Punjab Superior Judicial Service direct recruitment process, rejecting claims based on post-advertisement vacancies, invalid reservations, and procedural delays.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, 2007 direct recruitment reservation Ex-Servicemen Rules, 1982

Sushila Aggarwal & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

15 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC should be limited in duration or continue till trial, due to conflicting precedents.

criminal other Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC duration of bail regular bail

D. Subba Rao v. D. Sadashiva Rao

15 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2018 INSC 516

The Supreme Court disposed of a long-pending civil appeal by incorporating a mediation-based settlement into its judgment, emphasizing the importance of amicable dispute resolution.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural amicable settlement mediation memorandum of settlement civil appeal

D. Subba Rao v. D. Sadashiva Rao

15 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court disposed of a long-pending civil appeal by recording and enforcing a bona fide settlement reached through mediation between the parties.

civil appeal_allowed amicable settlement mediation civil appeal Supreme Court of India

Khurshid Ahmed v. State of Jammu and Kashmir

15 May 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder under Section 302 RPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, affirming the High Court's reversal of the trial court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder eyewitness testimony motive FIR

M V AMREETH v. K VENKATA KRISHNA

15 May 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot impose an additional deposit condition beyond the fine already paid under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and directed expeditious disposal of the revision petition.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque bounce Revision petition Suspension of sentence

M V AMREETH v. K VENKATA KRISHNA

15 May 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

The Supreme Court held that the Revisional Court may impose conditions for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act, but such conditions must be reasonable and not impose undue hardship when the original fine has been paid.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act suspension of sentence condition of deposit revision petition

Manoj Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

15 May 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court modified the appellants' conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that the death occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC

Manoj Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

15 May 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation or intention to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC

Shyamali Chatterjee v. Municipal Corporation, Bhilai

14 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation awarded to a daily wager illegally terminated, directing additional payment with interest, emphasizing fair compensation in lieu of reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant illegal termination compensation in lieu of reinstatement daily wager Labour Court

Shyamali Chatterjee v. Municipal Corporation, Bhilai

14 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation awarded for illegal termination of a daily wager, emphasizing fair quantum and interest from the date of termination.

labor appeal_allowed Significant illegal termination one-time compensation daily wager reinstatement

Patni Hushenbhai Sidibhai Kotvala Thr. Lrs & Ors v. National Highways Authority of India

14 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that compensation for land acquisition must be based on the return from fruit-bearing trees with additional solatium and interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984, allowing adjustment of amounts already paid.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation fruit-bearing trees solatium

Supriya Suresh Patil v. The State of Maharashtra

12 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2018 INSC 466

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing compassionate appointment to the appellant's daughter, holding that survival of the family for over ten years is not a valid ground to deny such appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Procedural compassionate appointment Article 142 Constitution of India immediate necessity age limit

Supriya Suresh Patil v. The State of Maharashtra

12 May 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed consideration of the appellant's daughter for compassionate appointment, holding that survival over ten years is not a sole ground for rejection.

administrative appeal_allowed Procedural compassionate appointment Article 142 age limit family necessity

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD

11 May 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana; R. Banumathi; Mohan M. Shantanago...

The Supreme Court held that charges related to containers and allied services are includible in the transaction value for excise duty under the Central Excise Act, affirming that the measure of excise duty extends beyond manufacturing cost and profit to include permissible value additions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 transaction value excise duty valuation manufacturing cost

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD

11 May 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana; R. Banumathi; Mohan M. Shantanag...
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that excise duty valuation under the Central Excise Act includes all value additions up to clearance, including container-related charges, affirming the statutory concept of 'transaction value' and overruling the limitation to manufacturing cost and profit.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 transaction value excise duty valuation manufacturing cost

Suresh Singh & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh

11 May 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals against convictions under Section 307/149 IPC, upheld the reduction of sentence from seven to five years, and rejected the appellants' claim of private defense.

criminal appeal_dismissed concurrent findings private defense Section 307 IPC deadly weapons

Suresh Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

11 May 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions and affirmed the High Court's reduction of sentence from seven to five years under Section 307/149 IPC, dismissing the appellants' claims of private defense and interference with concurrent findings.

criminal appeal_dismissed concurrent findings private defense Section 307 IPC deadly weapons

Mahesh Chandra Verma v. State of Jharkhand

11 May 2018 · Chelameswar; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that service rendered by Judicial Officers as Fast Track court Judges must be counted for pension and retiral benefits upon their absorption into the regular judicial cadre.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Fast Track courts Judicial Officers Pensionary benefits Regularization

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE v. M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD

11 May 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana; R. Banumathi; Mohan M. Shantanago...

The Supreme Court held that the transaction value for excise duty under Section 4 includes all ancillary charges related to manufactured goods, affirming that the measure of levy is not confined to manufacturing cost and profit alone.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 3 Section 4 transaction value