Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Lahari Shakamuri v. Shoban Kodali

15 Mar 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi

The Hyderabad High Court held that custody jurisdiction lies with the US courts for minor children ordinarily resident there and ordered their return to the US, emphasizing the paramount importance of the children's welfare and best interests in cross-border custody disputes.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody jurisdiction foreign court orders best interests of the child

Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors. v. Shree Lal Meena

15 Mar 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that employees who resigned before the notification of retrospective pension schemes are not entitled to pension benefits under those schemes, distinguishing resignation from voluntary retirement and upholding forfeiture clauses in contributory pension rules.

labor appeal_allowed (in lead matter), appeal_dismissed (in connected matters) Significant resignation voluntary retirement pension scheme retrospective application

S. SREESANTH v. BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA

15 Mar 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld BCCI's life ban on cricketer Sreesanth for spot fixing, affirming the disciplinary committee's findings and limiting judicial review to procedural fairness without reappraising evidence.

sports_law / administrative appeal_dismissed Significant BCCI Anti-Corruption Code disciplinary proceedings spot fixing natural justice

S. SREESANTH v. THE BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA

15 Mar 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the BCCI disciplinary committee's life ban on cricketer S. Sreesanth for spot fixing, affirming limited judicial review of disciplinary proceedings and distinguishing them from criminal trials.

sports_law / administrative appeal_dismissed Significant BCCI Anti-Corruption Code disciplinary proceedings spot fixing principles of natural justice

Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices v. Smt. Swam Kanta

15 Mar 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Gramin Dak Sewaks are not employees under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and are not entitled to gratuity upon voluntary resignation under the 2011 Rules governing their service.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Gramin Dak Sewak Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 extra-departmental agent voluntary resignation

Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab

15 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court clarified the stringent yet not infallible standard for summoning additional accused under Section 319 CrPC and remanded the matter for fresh consideration applying correct legal principles.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused discretionary power degree of satisfaction

The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Bunty

14 Mar 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the Screening Committee's decision denying police appointment to a candidate acquitted on benefit of doubt, holding such acquittal does not guarantee fitness for disciplined service.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Screening Committee Police Constable appointment Benefit of doubt acquittal Moral turpitude

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Bunty

14 Mar 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a benefit of doubt acquittal in a criminal case involving moral turpitude does not entitle a candidate to automatic appointment in the police force, upholding the Screening Committee's discretion to assess fitness.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Screening Committee Police Constable appointment Benefit of doubt acquittal Moral turpitude

Sarvepalli Ramaiah v. The District Collector, Chittoor District

14 Mar 2019 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of ryotwari pattas over land classified as government-owned tank poramboke under the Inams Abolition Act, dismissing the appellants' claim due to statutory inalienability and lack of challenge to the Gazette Notification.

property appeal_dismissed Significant ryotwari patta Inams Abolition Act Section 2-A tank poramboke

Pooran Singh v. Dhaniram

14 Mar 2019 · Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a civil suit challenging a Collector's order under Section 170B of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code is barred once the order has been judicially affirmed, restoring the trial court's dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 170B Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code tribal land reversion res judicata civil court jurisdiction

Balaji v. The State of Maharashtra

14 Mar 2019 · N.V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2019 INSC 363

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused due to tampered dying declaration, unproved motive, and unreliable confession, emphasizing the necessity of credible evidence and proper procedure for conviction under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration tampering motive voluntary confession

Balaji v. The State of Maharashtra

14 Mar 2019 · N.V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the murder conviction due to unreliable dying declaration, unproven motive, and fabricated confession, emphasizing the need for trustworthy evidence to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration tampering fitness to make statement motive

Periyasami and Ors. v. S. Nallasamy

14 Mar 2019 · Hemant Gupta; Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud · 2019 INSC 371

The Supreme Court held that additional accused can be summoned under Section 319 CrPC only on strong and cogent evidence, and set aside the High Court's order summoning appellants absent such evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused strong and cogent evidence matrimonial dispute

Periyasami and Ors. v. S. Nallasamy

14 Mar 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that additional accused cannot be summoned under Section 319 CrPC without strong and cogent evidence, setting aside the High Court's order and restoring the trial court's dismissal of such application in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused strong and cogent evidence matrimonial dispute

Rameshwar Dass v. State of Punjab

14 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's methodical enhancement of compensation in land acquisition proceedings, affirming that compensation must reflect location, quality, and proximity factors, and dismissed the appellant's challenge to the awarded rates.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition compensation market value Land Acquisition Act 1894

Union of India v. Shankar Prasad Deep

14 Mar 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta · 2019 INSC 365

The Supreme Court held that preferential employment to land oustees must comply with prescribed qualifications and selection procedures, directed re-verification of rejected applications, and set aside lower courts' orders mandating employment without selection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant land oustees preferential employment Railway Board policy rehabilitation

Union of India v. Shankar Prasad Deep

14 Mar 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that preferential employment for land oustees must comply with prescribed qualifications and selection procedures, directed re-verification of rejected applications, and mandated fresh recruitment with due procedural safeguards.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant land oustees rehabilitation preferential employment Railway Board policy

Marwari Relief Society v. Amulya Kumar Singh

14 Mar 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court's orders permitting filing of missing documents including Power of Attorney in an eviction suit, holding that verification by a constituted agent suffices authority to file the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC Power of Attorney Verification of plaint Filing of additional documents

Raghwendra Sharan Singh v. Ram Prasanna Singh

13 Mar 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a suit barred by limitation on the face of the plaint can be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC without evidence, allowing the appeal and rejecting the plaint challenging a 1981 registered gift deed filed after 22 years.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 11 CPC limitation registered gift deed cause of action

Gurnam Singh v. Lehna Singh

13 Mar 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah · 2019 INSC 356

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC and restored the First Appellate Court's judgment holding the Will genuine and dismissing the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Reappreciation of Evidence