Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

BAJAJ AUTO LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

27 Mar 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that excise duty exemption notifications also exempt National Calamity Contingent Duty and related cesses, ruling that Bajaj Auto Limited is not liable to pay these duties on its exempted goods.

tax appeal_allowed Significant National Calamity Contingent Duty Education Cess Secondary & Higher Education Cess Central Excise Duty exemption

Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Rahul Modi and Another

27 Mar 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that arrests made by SFIO after expiry of the initial investigation period but before valid extension and judicial remand orders are prima facie illegal, and habeas corpus petitions cannot challenge valid remand orders, setting aside the Delhi High Court's interim bail order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Serious Fraud Investigation Office Companies Act 2013 Section 212 investigation period extension

The Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi v. Ram Kishan Dass

26 Mar 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the assessing officer had inherent jurisdiction prior to 1 April 2008 to extend time suo motu for submission of audit reports under Section 142(2C) of the Income Tax Act, and the 2008 amendment was clarificatory and retrospective.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 142(2C) Extension of time Suo motu power

Modern Transportation Consultation Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Central Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Ors.

26 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

Retired Railway employees who withdrew full provident fund benefits under the General Provident Fund scheme are not "excluded employees" under the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 and are liable for provident fund contributions upon re-employment under the Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 excluded employee General Provident Fund

Ganga Prasad Mahto v. State of Bihar & Anr.

26 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to lack of medical evidence, unreliable prosecution witnesses, and the complainant's history of false allegations, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC rape medical evidence complainant credibility

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Dinesh Singh

26 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court allowed LIC's appeal and awarded lump sum compensation to a terminated temporary caretaker in lieu of reinstatement and service claims, balancing equities after prolonged litigation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant temporary appointment Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 Regulation No. 8 termination

V. Krishnamurthy & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.

26 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court upheld the State's lawful resumption of land for public purposes, rejecting mala fides allegations unsupported by evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant resumption of land mala fides public purpose allotment agreement

The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Uday Singh

26 Mar 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that once confiscation proceedings are initiated under the Indian Forest Act as amended in Madhya Pradesh, criminal courts lack jurisdiction to order interim release of seized property, and the High Court cannot direct such release under its inherent powers.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Indian Forest Act, 1927 MP Act 25 of 1983 confiscation proceedings Section 451 CrPC

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mousumi Bhattacharjee

26 Mar 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that death due to malaria contracted via mosquito bite in a malaria-prone area does not constitute an accident under a personal accident insurance policy, reversing the consumer commission's award.

insurance appeal_allowed Significant accident insurance definition of accident malaria mosquito bite

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mousumi Bhattacharjee

26 Mar 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that death due to malaria contracted via mosquito bite in an endemic area does not constitute accidental death under an insurance policy covering accidents.

insurance appeal_allowed Significant accident insurance definition of accident malaria mosquito bite

CTO, Chori Rodhi, Circle III, Rajasthan, Jaipur v. Messrs Prasoon Enterprises, Jaipur

26 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that mobile crane wire ropes are integral parts of the crane and taxable at 4% under Schedule 4, entry 155 of the Rajasthan VAT Act, dismissing the State's appeal for a higher tax rate.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Value Added Tax Mobile Crane Wire Ropes Tax Classification Schedule 4 Entry 155

State of Rajasthan v. M/s Prasoon Enterprises

26 Mar 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that wire ropes used in Mobile Cranes are essential parts taxable at 4% under Entry 155 of Schedule IV of the Rajasthan VAT Act, dismissing the State's appeal for higher tax under the Residuary Entry.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Value Added Tax Mobile Crane Wire Ropes Rajasthan VAT Act Entry 155 Schedule IV

ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER WELFARE AND AID v. GRANITE GATE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR

25 Mar 2019 · HON'BLE DR.

The Supreme Court held that both the builder and seller are jointly liable promoters under RERA and restored the deleted party to the consumer complaint for final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 2(zk) promoter definition consumer complaint

ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER WELFARE AND AID v. GRANITE GATE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR

25 Mar 2019 · HON'BLE DR.

The Supreme Court held that both the builder and seller are jointly liable promoters under RERA and restored the deleted party in a consumer complaint concerning a real estate project.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 promoter definition joint liability consumer complaint

Pavan Vasudeo Sharma v. State of Maharashtra

25 Mar 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra · 2019 INSC 396

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to insufficient circumstantial evidence failing to exclude all reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder service weapon mobile phone subscription

MAHAVIR ROAD AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD v. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

25 Mar 2019 · HON'BLE DR.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal upholding the insurer's rejection of a claim for road damage caused by normal wear and tear excluded under the policy, emphasizing the insured's failure to prove damage by covered perils and non-compliance with policy conditions.

civil appeal_dismissed insurance policy material damage normal wear and tear abnormal rainfall

Mahavir Road and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd

25 Mar 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the rejection of an insurance claim for road damage, holding that the damage was due to normal wear and tear excluded under the policy and that the appellant failed to prove loss from an insured peril.

civil appeal_dismissed insurance claim material damage normal wear and tear gradual deterioration

KOLKATA WEST INTERNATIONAL CITY PVT LTD v. DEVASIS RUDRA

25 Mar 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a buyer is entitled to refund with reasonable interest and compensation when possession is delayed unreasonably beyond the contractual period, modifying the interest rate awarded from 12% to 9% per annum.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Buyer's Agreement possession delay refund interest

Pavan Vasudeo Sharma v. State of Maharashtra

25 Mar 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to failure of the prosecution to conclusively establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder service weapon identification parade

Anoop Bartaria v. Dy. Director Enforcement

25 Mar 2019 · Bela M. Trivedi; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that offences under the PMLA are cognizable and non-bailable, knowledge of proceeds of crime is not essential for money laundering offence, and dismissed the petitioners' challenge to the prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act money laundering cognizable offence non-bailable offence