Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

AMIT NEHRA & ANR. v. PAWAN KUMAR GARG & ORS.

09 Sep 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 1086

The Supreme Court held that verified and admitted homebuyer claims in insolvency proceedings must be treated as timely claims entitling possession under the Resolution Plan, setting aside lower tribunals’ orders limiting relief to partial refund.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Resolution Plan Homebuyer claims

Maha Mineral Mining & Benefication Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Co. Ltd.

09 Sep 2025 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1085

The Supreme Court held that a work execution certificate suffices to prove past experience in a consortium for tender eligibility, setting aside bid rejection for non-submission of JV agreement, and remanded the washery capacity issue for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Tender Evaluation Joint Venture Agreement Past Experience Criteria Work Execution Certificate

Kisan Vithoba Aakhade v. Suresh Tukaram Nerkar

09 Sep 2025 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1092

The Supreme Court upheld the plaintiff's title and possession over disputed property, dismissing the appeal that challenged corrected revenue records and possession claims based on waste dumping.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant declaration of ownership possession sale deed revenue records correction

Manjula v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

09 Sep 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1093

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by fixing the deceased's monthly income at Rs. 12,000 and applying established principles on multiplier, future prospects, and loss of consortium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation monthly income future prospects

P. Radhakrishnan v. Cochin Devaswom Board

09 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1183

The Supreme Court held that a writ petitioner cannot be placed in a worse position by court directions beyond the scope of the petition without notice, setting aside the Kerala High Court's additional directions while upholding the license fee enhancement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant license fee enhancement writ petition natural justice principles of judicial review

Malleeswari v. K. Suguna and Another

08 Sep 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 1080
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction by reappreciating facts in a partition suit amendment application, restoring the Trial Court's dismissal and emphasizing the limited scope of review under CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005 coparcenary rights power of review Section 114 CPC

Haryana Power Purchase Centre v. GMR Kamalanga Energy Limited

08 Sep 2025 · B.R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1079
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld regulatory orders directing pro rata allocation of coal supply and costs among all power purchasers under a thermal power project, dismissing appeals challenging expert bodies' concurrent findings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Power Purchase Agreement Fuel Supply Agreement Change in Law

Anoop Maheshwari v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

04 Sep 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1076

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by affirming functional disability assessment, accepting income tax returns as income proof, and awarding full medical and future prosthetic expenses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation disability assessment functional disability income tax returns

Shyam Lal v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

04 Sep 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1078

The Supreme Court held that a utility vehicle registered and permitted to carry passengers is not restricted by a goods-only limitation clause in the insurance policy, thereby affirming the insurer's liability to indemnify the owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant utility vehicle insurance policy limitation contract carriage motor vehicles act

Vanita v. M/S Shriram Insurance Company Ltd

04 Sep 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1077

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the claimants failed to prove the involvement of the offending Tata Magic vehicle, thereby absolving the insurance company from liability to pay compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim burden of proof offending vehicle insurance liability

Haseena & Ors. v. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

04 Sep 2025 · K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1075
Cites 0 · Cited by 16

The Supreme Court held that death occurring months after an accident requires clear evidence of causation, and dismissed the claim for compensation where expert opinion indicated death was not directly caused by the accident.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim causation compensation pulmonary embolism

C.P. Francis v. C.P. Joseph

03 Sep 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 1071

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot invoke Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act as a new ground at second appeal without pleadings, and upheld the validity of a duly executed will despite an attesting witness being a beneficiary.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 67 Indian Succession Act Section 100 CPC will validity attesting witness beneficiary

Urmila Chand v. Sonu Chand and Others

03 Sep 2025 · N. V. Anjaria; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1072

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant, having voluntarily accepted the compensation awarded by the Tribunal and signed the disbursement order, cannot challenge the apportionment or seek condonation of delay in filing a review petition.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Accident Claim Compensation disbursement Review petition delay Appropriation of compensation

Manoj Dhankar v. Neeharika

02 Sep 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1068

The Supreme Court granted the father limited video-conferencing visitation rights with his son residing abroad, emphasizing the child's welfare and right to maintain relationships with both parents.

family appeal_allowed Significant child custody visitation rights video-conferencing welfare of child

SHREE NAGANI SILK MILLS PVT. LTD. v. L.D. INDUSTRIES LTD.

02 Sep 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1064

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against a sick company restrained by BIFR are not barred per se, and summons once issued cannot be recalled without evidence, restoring the complaints for trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Sick Industrial Companies Act BIFR restraint order Recall of summons

Shailja Krishna v. Satori Global Limited

02 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1065

The Supreme Court held that the NCLT has jurisdiction to decide oppression and mismanagement complaints including validity of share transfers and gift deeds, restored the appellant's shareholding and directorship, and set aside the NCLAT order dismissing the company petition.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Sections 397 and 398 oppression and mismanagement gift deed validity

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. v. M/S G & T BECKFIELD DRILLING SERVICES PVT. LTD.

02 Sep 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; MANOJ MISRA · 2025 INSC 1066
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that a contractual clause barring interest on delayed payments does not bar the arbitral tribunal from awarding pendente lite interest, and upheld the arbitral award including interest from the date of claim affirmation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitral award interest pendente lite Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 clause 18.1

Sushil Kumar Tiwari v. Hare Ram Sah

01 Sep 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 1061

The Supreme Court restored convictions in a POCSO rape case, holding that procedural errors including joint trial and charge framing do not warrant acquittal absent actual prejudice to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 223 CrPC framing of charge joint trial

Tarun Sharma v. State of Haryana

01 Sep 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1139

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to grave doubts on the reliability of the dying declaration and procedural lapses denying fair trial, emphasizing the necessity of effective legal representation and proper recording of dying declarations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration fitness certificate hostile witness fair trial

The State of Telangana v. Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram

01 Sep 2025 · B. R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 1058

The Supreme Court upheld the State of Telangana's definition of 'local candidate' for medical admissions under Article 371D, rejecting the High Court's expansion of the definition while allowing a proviso for candidates compelled to study outside the State due to parental employment transfers.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 371D local candidate Competent Authority Quota Telangana Medical Admission Rules 2017