Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

RAMKIRAT MUNILAL GOUD v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

07 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 702

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a child rape and murder case due to flawed investigation and failure to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together extra-judicial confession forensic evidence

TATA STEEL LTD v. RAJ KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS

07 May 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 639
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that appeals under Section 61(2) IBC must be filed within 30 days plus a maximum 15-day condonable period, and the NCLAT cannot condone delay beyond this statutory limit, setting aside the NCLAT's order condoning delay in this case.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 61 limitation condonation of delay Limitation Act, 1963

P. Nallammal v. State by the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Police, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu

07 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 643
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the public servant's wife for abetment in acquiring disproportionate assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming that non-public servants can be liable if they intentionally aid such offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 109 IPC abetment

MOHAMMED ASARUDEEN v. UNION OF INDIA

06 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 746

The Supreme Court held that witness protection under Section 44(2) of UAPA and Section 17(2) of the NIA Act requires individual recorded satisfaction and adherence to natural justice, setting aside blanket protection orders that denied the accused access to witness statements.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant witness protection Section 44 UAPA Section 17 NIA Act right to fair trial

Vijay Kumar Padalia v. State of Uttarakhand

06 May 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 660

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the NGT's procedural dismissal, permitting amendment and fresh filing to ensure justice over technicalities in environmental litigation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Section 14 NGT Act Section 16 NGT Act procedural dismissal

Commissioner of Service Tax-III, Mumbai v. M/s. Vodafone India Limited

06 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 914

The Supreme Court upheld that services provided to foreign clients with payment in convertible foreign exchange qualify as export of services exempt from service tax under the Export of Service Rules, 2005, dismissing Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant export of services service tax Business Auxiliary Services Telecommunication Services

DISTRICT APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY v. KAUSHIK BABULAL SHAH

06 May 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 637
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing the release of a sealed sonography machine after acquittal, holding that indefinite sealing is unjustified under the PC & PNDT Act and CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant PC & PNDT Act Section 29 Section 30 Section 451 CrPC

Tahir V. Isani v. Madan Waman Chodankar

06 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1044
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser from a third party not involved in the suit is not a transferee pendente lite under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC and can raise objections in execution proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI CPC Rule 102 transferee pendente lite execution of decree

Kumari Rekha v. Shambhu Saran Paswan

06 May 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 631

The Supreme Court allowed divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage under its Article 142 powers, dissolving a 26-year marriage after prolonged separation and failed reconciliation.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India Hindu Marriage Act 1955 divorce

Gopal Govind Lakade v. State of Maharashtra

06 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 658

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order dismissing a criminal application without notice or reasons, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and remanding the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR principles of natural justice notice to respondents criminal application

CHHATTISGARH DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE v. SHWETA KABRA

06 May 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 720

The Supreme Court held that fee fixation by a committee effective from a specified academic year cannot be applied retrospectively to earlier admitted students, setting aside the High Court's order for refund of excess fees.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fee fixation retrospective application refund of excess fees Fee Fixation Committee

A. Raja v. D. Kumar

06 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 629

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant validly belonged to the Scheduled Caste Hindu Parayan caste of Kerala and set aside the High Court's order voiding his election.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes Representation of the People Act, 1951 Election Petition Caste Certificate

Rajendra Anant Varik v. Govind B. Prabhugaonkar

06 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 633

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, compounded the offence under Section 138 NI Act after payment of cheque amount and compensation, and acquitted the accused-appellant considering the defense under the Goa Money-Lenders Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Goa Money-Lenders Act compounding offence Article 142 Constitution

ARABIAN EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

06 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 630

The Supreme Court held that acceptance of a full and final settlement under economic duress does not bar arbitration and set aside the High Court's refusal to appoint an arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement accord and satisfaction economic duress discharge voucher

Saroj Salkan v. Huma Singh & Ors.

06 May 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 632
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a partition suit for lack of maintainable pleadings and binding prior decrees, holding that Order XII Rule 6 CPC authorizes dismissal on court's own motion and that amended Hindu Succession Act provisions do not apply retroactively.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC Hindu Succession Act 1956 partition suit Hindu Undivided Family

Harjinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.

06 May 2025 · Vikram Nath; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 634

The Supreme Court held that the Trial Court rightly summoned a new accused under Section 319 CrPC based on prima-facie evidence despite untested alibi, setting aside the High Court's quashing order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning of accused abetment to suicide alibi defence

Vishal Tiwari v. Union of India

05 May 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 647

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking suo motu contempt proceedings against a political leader for scandalizing remarks, emphasizing judicial restraint and protection of free speech while condemning hate speech.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant criminal contempt scandalizing court judicial review free speech

Powergrid Corporation of India Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

05 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 626

The Supreme Court upheld CERC and Appellate Tribunal orders denying additional capitalization claims for replacement of damaged transformers, holding such replacements fall under operation and maintenance and are covered by the appellant's self-insurance reserve.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant additional capitalization Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Act 2003 Inter-State Transmission System

Shubhkaran Singh v. Abhayraj Singh & Ors.

05 May 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 628
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that the power to recall witnesses under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC is exclusively vested in the court for clarification purposes and cannot be invoked by parties for re-examination or cross-examination, dismissing the petitioner's appeal against the High Court's rejection of such recall.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 18 Rule 17 CPC recall of witness Section 165 Evidence Act Section 151 CPC

THE ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SMT. HONNAMMA & ORS.

05 May 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 625

The Supreme Court held that the insurer of an insured tractor is liable to pay compensation for death caused by an accident involving a trailer attached to the tractor, even if the trailer is not separately insured.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 insurance liability tractor-trailer accident compensation enhancement