Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

NAND KISHORE PRASAD v. DR. MOHIB HAMIDI

10 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that operating on a patient with critically low platelet count without necessity amounts to medical negligence, reinstated surgeon's liability, and directed full compensation to be paid by the hospital under vicarious liability.

consumer_protection appeal_partly_allowed Significant medical negligence consumer protection platelet count vicarious liability

Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. State of Punjab

10 May 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court granted leave and referred to a larger Bench the question of whether a trial court can summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC after trial conclusion and judgment pronouncement, emphasizing cautious exercise of this power to ensure fair trial.

criminal other Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused functus officio fair trial

Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. State of Punjab

10 May 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether a trial court can summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC after conviction of other accused, emphasizing cautious exercise of this extraordinary power to ensure fair trial.

criminal other Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused functus officio Hardeep Singh case

Ram Parshotam Mittal & Ors. v. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

10 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of certain share allotments and transfers in HQRL due to statutory violations and oppression, dismissing the appellants' appeals and affirming preference shareholders' voting rights under the Companies Act.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 1956 Section 286 Section 300 Section 108

Ram Parshotam Mittal & Ors. v. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

10 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of certain share allotments and transfers in HQRL for non-compliance with mandatory company law provisions and affirmed the voting rights of cumulative preference shareholders, dismissing the appellants' challenge.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 1956 Section 286 Section 300 Section 108

Rakesh Tiwari v. Alok Pandey

10 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld an advocate's conviction for criminal contempt for abusing and threatening a judicial officer, modified the sentence by suspending imprisonment subject to good conduct, and emphasized the duty of advocates to uphold court dignity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal contempt advocate professional conduct Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Section 156(3) CrPC

The Superintending Engineer TWAD Board & Another v. M. Natesan

10 May 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that temporary daily wage workers must prove continuous service for 240 days to claim reinstatement, but where reinstatement is not feasible due to superannuation, compensation including partial back wages can be treated as full settlement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant temporary worker daily wages continuous service 240 days

B K Pavitra v. Union of India

10 May 2019 · U U Lalit; Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2019 INSC 671
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Karnataka's Reservation Act 2018 providing consequential seniority to SC/ST promotees, focusing on compliance with Nagaraj's data requirements and the legislature's power vis-à-vis judicial decisions.

constitutional other Significant reservation in promotion consequential seniority Article 16(4A) backwardness

B K Pavitra v. Union of India

10 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Karnataka's Reservation Act 2018 providing consequential seniority to SC/ST promotees, emphasizing compliance with Nagaraj's data requirements and prohibiting legislative overruling of judicial decisions without altering their basis.

constitutional other Significant Reservation in promotion Consequential seniority Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes

Jitender Kumar @ Jitender Singh v. The State of Bihar

10 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. reasoned order application of mind remand

Jitender Kumar @ Jitender Singh v. The State of Bihar

10 May 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. summoning order reasoned order application of mind

Vibha Bakshi Gokhale v. M/s Gruhashilp Constructions

10 May 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of a consumer complaint by the NCDRC on technical grounds, emphasizing that marginal delays should be condoned to uphold the purpose of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act 1986 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission consumer complaint deficiency of service

Vibha Bakshi Gokhale v. M/s Gruhashilp Constructions

10 May 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court set aside the NCDRC's dismissal of a consumer complaint on technical grounds of delay, emphasizing a liberal approach to ensure access to justice under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act 1986 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission consumer complaint deficiency of service

Narad Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

10 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Arun Mishra · 2019 INSC 675

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of caste-based atrocity charges due to insufficient evidence but upheld his conviction for using obscene language under Section 294 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 294 IPC Section 506 IPC caste-based abuse

Narad Patel v. Chhattisgarh State

10 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 294 IPC but acquitted him of SC/ST Act charges due to lack of evidence of caste-based abuse, granting him benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 294 IPC Section 506-B IPC benefit of doubt

Narad Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

10 May 2019 · Arun Mishra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for obscene language under Section 294 IPC but acquitted him of caste-based abuse under the SC/ST Act due to insufficient evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 294 IPC Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act obscene language

Kumud w/o Mahadeorao Salunke v. Shri Pandurang Narayan Gandhewar Through Lrs. & Ors.

10 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra · 2019 INSC 667

The Supreme Court held that the appellate authority's detailed consideration of eviction permission under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act precludes High Court interference despite the competent authority's cryptic order, restoring eviction permission and decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Slum Areas Act 1971 Section 22(4) eviction Rent Controller

Kumud w/o Mahadeorao Salunke v. Shri Pandurang Narayan Gandhewar Through Lrs. & Ors.

10 May 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction permission granted by the Slum Authority and Appellate Authority, setting aside the High Court's interference for failure to consider statutory factors, emphasizing finality of orders and proper application of mind by authorities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Slum Areas Act 1971 Section 22(4) Rent Controller permission Transfer of Property Act Section 108

DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. v. D.S. DHANDA

10 May 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that compensation for delay in possession must align with contractual damages and prior consent orders, awarding interest at 9% per annum and rejecting arbitrary multiple compensations by consumer fora.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant delay in possession consumer protection compensation interest rate

Girish Kumar v. State of Maharashtra

10 May 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; M. R. Shah · 2019 INSC 665

The Supreme Court held that deemed date of promotion for seniority cannot substitute actual continuous service required under recruitment rules for promotion eligibility.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant deemed date of promotion continuous service seniority rules recruitment rules