Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

M/S. NOLA RAM DULICHAND DAL MILLS & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

14 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the Government's Circular excluding 100% Export Oriented Units from export incentive benefits under the Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojna, affirming the validity of policy clarifications without formal amendment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Trade Policy Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojna Export Oriented Units Special Economic Zone

Vinod Ravjibhai Rajput v. State of Gujarat & Ors.

14 Feb 2020 · Indira Banerjee; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an employee validly appointed prior to new recruitment rules is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and benefits, rejecting retrospective application of later rules to deny such rights.

labor appeal_allowed Significant reinstatement continuity of service retrospective application regularization

Vinod Ravjibhai Rajput v. State of Gujarat & Ors.

14 Feb 2020 · Indira Banerjee; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that reinstatement following illegal termination includes continuity of service and benefits from the original appointment date, rejecting retrospective application of later recruitment rules and denying back wages for periods not worked.

civil appeal_allowed Significant reinstatement continuity of service retrospective application Government Resolution 2007

M/S BASPA ORGANICS LIMITED v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

14 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld repudiation of an insurance claim due to the insured’s failure to obtain and disclose the required licence for storing Hexane under the Petroleum Act and Rules, affirming breach of policy conditions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance claim repudiation licence for storage of petroleum Petroleum Act 1934 Petroleum Rules 1976

Chandigarh Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Punjab & Anr.

14 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the arbitrator's unreasoned award of 93.12% premium and directing payment at 35.02% premium with interest, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned awards under contract terms.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Award Reasoned Award Contractual Premium Extra Work Claims

APS FOREX SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. SHAKTI INTERNATIONAL FASHION LINKERS

14 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that admission of cheque issuance and signature creates a rebuttable presumption of debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and failure to rebut it warrants conviction under Section 138 for cheque dishonour.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act presumption of debt rebuttable presumption

Sobha Hibiscus Condominium v. Managing Director, M/s. Sobha Developers Ltd. & Anr.

14 Feb 2020 · R. Subhash Reddy

A statutory condominium body under the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act is not a recognised consumer association under the Consumer Protection Act, but voluntary consumer associations can file complaints on behalf of multiple consumers.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant consumer protection locus standi recognised consumer association voluntary association

Sobha Hibiscus Condominium v. Managing Director, M/s. Sobha Developers Ltd. & Anr.

14 Feb 2020 · R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a statutory condominium body is not a voluntary consumer association under the Consumer Protection Act and lacks locus standi, but recognised consumer associations can file complaints on behalf of multiple consumers and joint complaints require inherent permission upon admission.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant consumer protection recognised consumer association locus standi voluntary association

C. Doddanarayana Reddy v. C. Jayarama Reddy

14 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta · 2020 INSC 185
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in overturning concurrent findings of fact regarding the plaintiff's minority and validity of a release deed, dismissing the suit and restoring the lower courts' decisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant release deed minority proof School Leaving Certificate Section 35 Indian Evidence Act

C. Doddanarayana Reddy v. C. Jayarama Reddy

14 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with concurrent findings of fact regarding plaintiff's minority and validity of release deed, dismissing the suit and restoring lower courts' decisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant concurrent findings of fact School Leaving Certificate Section 35 Indian Evidence Act release deed validity

Union of India & Ors. v. M/s. Associated Container Terminal Ltd.

14 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that customs duty on unclaimed warehoused goods sold by auction must be calculated on sale proceeds as per Section 150(2) of the Customs Act, overruling the High Court's order and clarifying the priority of payments from sale proceeds.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 warehouse charges customs duty calculation sale proceeds distribution

Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar v. State of Bihar

14 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah · 2020 INSC 192

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused of rape and house trespass charges due to unreliable prosecutrix testimony unsupported by medical or forensic evidence and material contradictions creating reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony medical evidence forensic evidence

Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar v. State of Bihar

14 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused in a rape case due to material contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical or forensic evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable and trustworthy evidence to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony medical evidence FSL report

Laxmibai v. The Collector, Nanded

14 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 197
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that disqualification for failure to submit election expenses under Maharashtra local body laws must be proportionate and supported by reasons, and election disputes must be raised by election petition, not writ petition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant election expenses disqualification Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961

Laxmibai v. The Collector, Nanded

14 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that disqualification for failure to submit election expenses must be proportionate and supported by reasons, and election disputes should ordinarily be resolved through election petitions under Article 243-O, not writ petitions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant election expenses disqualification Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961

CHARITIES & ORS v. M/S BHASKAR RAJU & BROTHERS

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause in an insufficiently stamped lease deed cannot be enforced unless deficit stamp duty and penalty are paid, and set aside the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator on such a document.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement insufficiently stamped document Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Section 11(6) Arbitration Act

Charities & Ors. v. M/s Bhaskar Raju & Brothers

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that an insufficiently stamped lease deed cannot be relied upon to enforce an arbitration clause, setting aside the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator under such a document.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause insufficient stamp duty Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Section 11(6) Arbitration Act

Vinay Sharma v. Union of India and Others

14 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the mercy petition by the President of India, holding that the rejection was based on proper application of mind and all relevant materials were considered, thereby upholding the death sentence of the petitioner.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition Article 72 Constitution death sentence judicial review

Vinay Sharma v. Union of India and Others

14 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's mercy plea, holding that the President duly considered all relevant materials and the limited scope of judicial review does not permit interference.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition Article 72 Constitution of India death sentence judicial review

M/S. Z. ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. BIPIN BIHARI BEHERA & ORS.

14 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that stamp duty objections on power of attorney documents involving transfer of possession must be decided after evidence on possession is led, setting aside lower courts' orders and remitting the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant power of attorney Indian Stamp Act, 1899 stamp duty conveyance