Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

The State of Punjab v. Jasbir Singh

26 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that a preliminary inquiry and hearing before filing a complaint under Section 195 CrPC are discretionary, not mandatory, and directed a larger Bench to decide the conflicting precedents on this issue.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC Section 340 CrPC preliminary inquiry opportunity of hearing

Sitabai Shantaram Talawnekar v. Custodian of Evacuee Property

25 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that tenancy rights over evacuee property under the Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act apply only to tenancies created by the Custodian, and set aside tenancy declaration granted without such basis.

civil appeal_allowed Significant evacuee property tenancy rights Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act Custodian of Evacuee Property

ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LTD. v. SURESH PRODUCTIONS

25 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for a suit claiming infringement of satellite broadcasting rights begins only when the plaintiff's rights are threatened or infringed after expiry of prior assignments, dismissing the appeal and affirming the suit's validity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant cause of action limitation assignment deed satellite broadcasting rights

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Mukesh Poonamchand Shah

25 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that an employer can initiate disciplinary action based on a criminal conviction despite suspension of sentence pending appeal, and such action does not violate double jeopardy protections.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings criminal conviction Regulation 39(4) double jeopardy

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Mukesh Poonamchand Shah

25 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that an employer can proceed with disciplinary removal of an employee based on criminal conviction despite a pending appeal and prior disciplinary penalties, as double jeopardy does not apply to service proceedings.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings criminal conviction double jeopardy Regulation 39 LIC Staff Regulations

Union of India v. Federation of Self-Financed Ayurvedic Colleges

20 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 2018 Regulations mandating NEET for AYUSH admissions, affirming the Central Council's power to prescribe minimum educational standards including entrance examinations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant NEET AYUSH admissions Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 minimum standards of education

Kerala State Electricity Board v. Principal Sir Syed Institute for Technical Studies

20 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose · 2020 INSC 218

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala Electricity Commission's classification of Self-Financing Educational Institutions under a higher commercial tariff category, ruling that such differentiation is justified under Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and does not violate principles of natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 62(3) tariff fixation Self-Financing Educational Institutions

Kerala State Electricity Board v. Principal Sir Syed Institute for Technical Studies

20 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala Electricity Commission's tariff notification differentiating Self-Financing Educational Institutions from Government aided institutions under Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, holding such differentiation legally valid and not violative of natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 62(3) tariff fixation Self-Financing Educational Institutions

Md. Younus Ali Tarafdar v. The State of West Bengal

20 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to incomplete and unreliable circumstantial evidence failing to conclusively prove his guilt for murder and concealment of the body.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence identification of dead body confessional statement Section 302 IPC

Md. Younus Ali Tarafdar v. The State of West Bengal

20 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to incomplete and unreliable circumstantial evidence failing to exclude reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder identification of dead body confessional statement

Partap Singh v. Shiv Ram

20 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta · 2020 INSC 219

The Supreme Court held that statutory presumption of truth attached to revenue records cannot be rebutted solely by oral evidence and affirmed plaintiffs' ownership against defendant's tenancy claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant presumption of truth revenue record Jamabandi Khasra Girdawari

Partap Singh v. Shiv Ram

20 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that statutory presumption of truth attached to revenue records cannot be rebutted solely by oral evidence and affirmed plaintiffs' ownership against defendant's claim of tenancy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant presumption of truth revenue record Jamabandi Khasra Girdawari

Rajendra K. Bhutta v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

19 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that physical occupation under a Joint Development Agreement triggers the moratorium under Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, restraining the owner from recovering possession during the insolvency resolution process.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 14(1)(d) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code moratorium Joint Development Agreement physical occupation

Krishnaveni Rai v. Pankaj Rai

19 Feb 2020 · Indira Banerjee; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a second marriage solemnized during the pendency of a belated appeal against a divorce decree is not null and void, and the appellant is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 125 CrPC maintenance nullity of marriage

Krishnaveni Rai v. Pankaj Rai

19 Feb 2020 · Indira Banerjee; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a second marriage solemnized after divorce and after expiry of the appeal limitation period is not void, and maintenance cannot be denied on the ground of alleged nullity without a formal declaration.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 125 CrPC nullity of marriage maintenance

AGRA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION v. ANIL DAVID

19 Feb 2020 · ARUN MISHRA; M. R. SHAH; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court held that valuation for court fee in suits for cancellation of sale deeds by non-executant plaintiffs must be based on one-fifth of the market value computed as per revenue payable under Section 7(iv-A) of the U.P. Court Fees Act, overruling reliance on circle rates without proof.

civil appeal_allowed Significant court fee valuation Section 7(iv-A) Court Fees Act market value circle rate

AGRA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION v. ANIL DAVID

19 Feb 2020 · Arun Mishra; M. R. Shah; S. R. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that valuation for court fee in suits for cancellation of sale deeds by non-parties must be based on one-fifth of the market value as determined under Section 7(iv-A) of the Court Fees Act, and the question of valuation based on revenue payable is a factual issue to be tried.

civil appeal_allowed Significant court fee valuation Section 7(iv-A) Court Fees Act market value circle rate

DHEERAJ MOR v. HIGH COURT OF DELHI

19 Feb 2020 · ARUN MISHRA; S. RAVINDRA BHAT · 2020 INSC 209

The Supreme Court held that under Article 233(2), direct recruitment as District Judge is exclusively from advocates not in judicial service, and judicial officers cannot claim eligibility against the Bar quota.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 233 Constitution of India District Judge appointment Judicial service eligibility Direct recruitment from Bar

Dheeraj Mor v. High Court of Delhi

19 Feb 2020 · Arun Mishra; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that only practicing advocates not already in judicial service are eligible for direct recruitment as District Judges under Article 233(2), excluding judicial officers from the advocate quota.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 233 District Judge appointment Judicial service Direct recruitment

The Idol of Sri Renganathaswamy v. P K Thoppulan Chettiar & Ors.

19 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that the suit property is a specific endowment under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, barring civil court jurisdiction over its sale, and set aside the High Court's approval of the sale without statutory sanction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific endowment Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 public religious trust private trust