Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

M/S. Z. ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. BIPIN BIHARI BEHERA & ORS.

14 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that power of attorney documents involving transfer of possession must be treated as conveyances attracting stamp duty, and objections to insufficient stamping can be decided after evidence, setting aside lower courts' orders dismissing impounding applications.

civil appeal_allowed Significant power of attorney stamp duty Indian Stamp Act, 1899 conveyance

Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable despite disputed facts when the State arbitrarily denies refund of an auction amount where possession was never given, directing refund with interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition disputed questions of fact refund of auction amount

Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against the State for refund of auction amount when possession was not given and no excavation occurred, directing refund with interest and emphasizing the State's duty as a model litigant.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition contractual obligation refund

Vinod Giri Goswami v. State of Uttarakhand

14 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that promotee Deputy Collectors appointed ad hoc contrary to rules cannot count such service for seniority and upheld the State's seniority list reflecting final allotments under the Reorganization Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority dispute ad hoc appointment promotee quota direct recruit

Rambabu Singh Thakur v. Sunil Arora

13 Feb 2020 · R.F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court mandated stringent transparency and disclosure requirements for political parties regarding candidates with pending criminal cases, emphasizing compliance under threat of contempt.

constitutional other Significant criminalisation of politics disclosure of criminal antecedents political parties Supreme Court directions

Rambabu Singh Thakur v. Sunil Arora

13 Feb 2020 · R.F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court mandated political parties to transparently disclose candidates' criminal cases and reasons for their selection, enforcing compliance through contempt proceedings to combat criminalisation of politics.

constitutional other Significant criminalisation of politics disclosure of criminal antecedents political parties Supreme Court directions

ONGC Employees Mazdoor Sabha v. Executive Director Basin Manager

13 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that term-based employees irregularly appointed without public advertisement are entitled to regularization from the date of industrial dispute referral with actual benefits from that date, but not retrospectively from initial appointment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization term-based employment industrial dispute public advertisement

K Sivaraman & Ors. v. P Sathishkumar & Anr.

13 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 must be calculated based on the wage ceiling applicable on the date of the accident, and amendments deleting the wage ceiling do not apply retrospectively to accidents before their commencement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 wage ceiling retrospective application compensation calculation

OSIANS CONNOISSEURS OF ART PVT. LTD v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

12 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that trusts operating unregistered collective investment schemes violate SEBI regulations and directed refund of investors' monies with interest, dismissing the appeals.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Collective Investment Scheme SEBI Act 1992 Section 11AA Section 12(1B)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. National Bulk Handling Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

12 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's liability under a Fidelity Guarantee Insurance Policy where credible evidence showed employee involvement in loss by substitution of goods, and the claim was timely lodged.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Fidelity Guarantee Insurance Policy breach of fidelity insurance claim employee dishonesty

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. National Bulk Handling Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

12 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's liability under a Fidelity Guarantee Insurance Policy where employee involvement in loss was established and claim was timely lodged after investigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Fidelity Guarantee Insurance breach of fidelity insurance claim employee dishonesty

Balwant Singh v. Dungar Singh

12 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld a family partition arbitral award made by mutually appointed arbitrators, rejecting procedural objections and recording a subsequent settlement modifying the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitral award mutual consent arbitrators partition dispute

Balwant Singh v. Dungar Singh

12 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a mutually agreed arbitral award in a family partition dispute, dismissing objections of procedural irregularity and making the award rule of the court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitral award mutual consent partition dispute family property

Malluru Mallappa v. Kuruvathappa

12 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic dismissal of a first appeal for specific performance, emphasizing the appellate court's duty to reappreciate evidence and comply with Order XLI Rule 31 CPC, and remanded the case for fresh disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant first appeal Order XLI Rule 31 CPC specific performance limitation

Usha Ananthasubramanian v. Union of India

12 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that the NCLT and NCLAT lacked jurisdiction to freeze the appellant’s assets under company law provisions relating to mismanagement of a different company, setting aside the asset freeze orders.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 241 Section 337 Section 339

M/S. GOLDEN EARTH GROVES LTD v. M/S. ION EXCHANGE ENVIRO FARMS LTD

11 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that improper service of summons in execution proceedings invalidates ex-parte orders and auction sales, restoring the case for fresh hearing and allowing settlement of the decree amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant execution proceedings service of summons ex-parte order auction sale

Government of India v. Sitakant S. Dubhashi

11 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 01.08.2002 cut-off date for eligibility under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme for Goa Liberation Movement participants, dismissing the claim of a petitioner who received State pension after that date.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme Goa Liberation Movement Freedom Fighters Pension cut-off date

Sakkubai v. State of Karnataka

11 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 1988 notification declaring Virupapura Gaddi a protected area under the 1961 Act and affirmed the HWHAMA's authority under the Hampi Act to demolish illegal constructions violating heritage conservation laws.

property appeal_dismissed Significant protected area Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority Act, 2002 demolition

Sakkubai v. State of Karnataka

11 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a 1988 notification declaring Virupapura Gaddi a protected archaeological area and affirmed the Hampi Authority's power to demolish illegal commercial constructions violating heritage protection laws.

property appeal_dismissed Significant protected area ancient monuments archaeological site Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961

BRIG. NALIN KUMAR BHATIA v. UNION OF INDIA

11 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA

The Supreme Court held that non-empanelment for promotion must comply with the Army's promotion policy and quantification system, allowing judicial review to prevent arbitrary denial of promotion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion policy Indian Army empanelment Selection Board