Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa v. M/S Adani Exports Ltd.

11 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that under Section 130A of the Customs Act, the High Court has discretion and is not mandatorily required to direct the Appellate Tribunal to refer questions of law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 130A Customs Act High Court discretion Appellate Tribunal reference of question of law

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa v. M/S Adani Exports Ltd.

11 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that under Section 130A(4) of the Customs Act, the High Court has discretion, not a mandatory duty, to call for a statement from the Appellate Tribunal before deciding an application to refer a question of law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 130A Customs Act High Court discretion Appellate Tribunal reference of question of law

The State of Meghalaya v. Melvin Sohlangpiaw

11 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that under the 6th Schedule, the District Council Court has exclusive jurisdiction to try serious criminal offences involving Scheduled Tribes in autonomous districts, dismissing the State's appeal against case transfer.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant 6th Schedule District Council Court tribal areas exclusive jurisdiction

The State of Meghalaya v. Melvin Sohlangpiaw

11 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that under the 6th Schedule to the Constitution, the District Council Court has exclusive jurisdiction to try serious criminal offences involving Scheduled Tribe parties in autonomous tribal areas, dismissing the State's appeal against transfer of trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant 6th Schedule District Council Court tribal areas exclusive jurisdiction

Sridhar & Anr v. N. Revanna & Ors

11 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a condition in a gift deed absolutely restraining alienation is void under Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and upheld the validity of sale deeds executed by the donee.

property appeal_dismissed Significant gift deed condition restraining alienation Section 10 Transfer of Property Act Section 13 Transfer of Property Act

Rajeev Kourav v. Baisahab

11 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC by improperly assessing inadmissible evidence and restored the trial for alleged abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide quashing of criminal proceedings

Arun Singh & Others v. State of U.P. through its Secretary & Another

10 Feb 2020 · Navin Sinha; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court quashed the charge sheet under Section 493 IPC for lack of prima facie offence but upheld prosecution under the Dowry Prohibition Act, affirming that compromise does not justify quashing non-compoundable offences against society.

criminal appeal_partially_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 493 IPC Dowry Prohibition Act Non-compoundable offences

Arun Singh & Others v. State of U.P. through its Secretary & Another

10 Feb 2020 · Navin Sinha; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court quashed the charge sheet under Section 493 IPC for lack of prima facie offence but upheld charges under the Dowry Prohibition Act, affirming that compromise does not justify quashing non-compoundable serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed_in_part Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 493 IPC Dowry Prohibition Act Non-compoundable offence

State of U.P. & Ors. v. Virendra Kumar & Ors.

10 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether the State Government has jurisdiction to issue directions on service conditions of employees of the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, overruling aspects of its earlier judgment in State of U.P. vs. Preetam Singh.

administrative other Significant Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 State Control Over Public Corporation Act, 1975 conditions of service pension scheme

Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association

10 Feb 2020 · S. A. Bobde; R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; L. Nageswara Rao;... · 2020 INSC 159

The Supreme Court held that it can refer questions of constitutional law to a larger bench during pending review petitions arising from writ petitions under Article 32, affirming its plenary jurisdiction and clarifying procedural aspects of review petitions challenging religious practices.

constitutional other Significant Article 25 Constitution of India Article 26 Constitution of India Freedom of religion Judicial review

Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association

10 Feb 2020 · S. A. Bobde; R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; L. Nageswara Rao;...

The Supreme Court held that it can refer questions of constitutional law to a larger bench in pending review petitions arising from writ petitions under Article 32, affirming the maintainability of such reviews and clarifying the scope of judicial review over religious practices.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 25 Constitution Article 26 Constitution Freedom of religion Judicial review

Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India

10 Feb 2020 · Arun Mishra; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 18 and 18A of the SC/ST Act excluding anticipatory bail, recalled procedural safeguards imposed earlier, and affirmed courts' power to prevent misuse without diluting protective discrimination.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 18 Section 18A anticipatory bail

PRATHVI RAJ CHAUHAN v. UNION OF INDIA

10 Feb 2020 · ARUN MISHRA; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 18 and 18A of the SC/ST Act barring anticipatory bail, recalled judicial directions requiring approval for arrest and preliminary enquiry, and emphasized protective discrimination and judicial safeguards against misuse.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 18 Section 18A anticipatory bail

Atma Ram v. Charanjit Singh

10 Feb 2020 · N. V. Ramana; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a suit for specific performance originally filed as a mandatory injunction suit with insufficient court fee, emphasizing the necessity of proper procedural compliance and continuous readiness and willingness under the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance mandatory injunction court fee Section 149 CPC

Mukul Agrawal and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

10 Feb 2020 · Navin Sinha; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings for forgery after the civil appellate court conclusively held the disputed agreement was genuine, emphasizing that continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Forgery Quashing of criminal proceedings Abuse of process of law

Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another

10 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 160
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR alleging forgery pending civil adjudication but restored the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 N.I. Act, emphasizing statutory presumption and trial necessity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Forgery Cheque dishonour Handwriting expert opinion

Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another

10 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR alleging forgery pending civil adjudication but restored the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 N.I. Act, emphasizing the statutory presumption and need for trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Forgery Quashing of FIR Handwriting expert opinion

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation v. Krishan Gopal

07 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi · 2020 INSC 147
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court referred for reconsideration the legal principles on regularisation of temporary workmen under ONGC's Certified Standing Orders and unfair labour practices, emphasizing the applicability of Umadevi and statutory limits on regularisation.

labor other Significant regularisation unfair labour practice Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Certified Standing Orders

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation v. Krishan Gopal

07 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the PCLU decision on automatic regularisation of temporary ONGC workmen after 240 days' service requires reconsideration in light of constitutional principles and prior precedents, and referred the batch of appeals to a larger Bench.

labor other Significant regularisation temporary workmen Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 unfair labour practice

Nitesh Kumar Pandey v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

07 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling invalidating the introduction of a computer efficiency test mid-way in the Gram Rojgar Sahayak recruitment process, holding such alteration unauthorized and candidates not estopped from challenging it.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Gram Rojgar Sahayak MGNREGS selection process computer efficiency test