Supreme Court of India
18,257 judgments
Lalitha R Nath v. Kannur Medical College
The Supreme Court allowed appeals setting aside the High Court's quashing of refund notices, directed Kannur Medical College to deposit dues and security before affiliation, and entrusted the Admission Supervisory Committee to adjudicate disputed refund claims to protect students' rights.
Lalitha R Nath v. Kannur Medical College
The Supreme Court allowed appeals directing Kannur Medical College to comply with refund orders to students before granting affiliation, invalidated no-dues certificates signed under duress, and mandated adjudication of disputed claims by the Admission Supervisory Committee.
M/s. Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited v. Oscar Investments Limited and others
The Supreme Court directed banks and financial institutions to disclose detailed information on pledged shares and loan arrangements following concerns over unauthorized reduction of shareholding and violation of Court orders in a dispute involving Fortis Healthcare.
COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. v. BEANT SINGH
The Supreme Court upheld possession of the entire property by the Respondent, corrected the mesne profits increment frequency in the consent decree, and directed the Petitioner to hand over possession and pay arrears accordingly.
COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. v. BEANT SINGH
The Supreme Court upheld a consent decree directing possession delivery and corrected the mesne profits increase frequency from annually to every alternate year, dismissing the Petitioner’s challenge.
U.A. Basheer Thr. G.P.A. Holder v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court held that a partition deed executed after the Urban Land Ceiling Act's commencement cannot alter land status under the Act and remitted the case for factual determination of possession to decide abatement of proceedings under the Repeal Act.
U.A. Basheer Thr. G.P.A. Holder v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court held that a partition deed executed after the Urban Land Ceiling Act's commencement cannot alter excess land determination and remitted the case for factual inquiry on possession to decide abatement under the Repeal Act.
UNITECH Limited & Ors. v. Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against a state instrumentality for refund of amounts paid under a failed land development contract, awarding interest from dates of payment despite pending litigation and arbitration clause.
UNITECH Limited & Ors. v. Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against a state instrumentality for refund of amounts paid under a failed land development contract, awarding interest from dates of payment and clarifying liability apportionment post-state bifurcation.
The High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that refund of court fees under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act extends to all legally arrived at out-of-court settlements, including private settlements without court referral under Section 89 CPC.
The High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M.C. Subramaniam & ors.
The Supreme Court held that refund of court fees under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act extends to all legally arrived at out-of-court settlements, including private settlements without Court referral under Section 89 CPC, and dismissed the petition challenging the High Court's order directing such refund.
Narayan Sitaramji Badwaik v. Bisaram
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the second appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the High Court's duty to properly assess factual issues under Section 103 CPC when lower courts err in law affecting facts.
Narayan Sitaramji Badwaik v. Bisaram
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the possession suit and remanded the matter for fresh factual and legal consideration, clarifying the scope of interference in second appeals under Sections 100 and 103 CPC.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Pvt. Limited v. Ambuj A. Kasliwal & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that pre-deposit under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act is mandatory and cannot be waived entirely, allowing appeal subject to 25% pre-deposit of the adjusted debt.
Dumka Medical College, Dumka & Another v. Board of Governors in Supersession of Medical Council of India & Another
The Supreme Court upheld the Medical Council of India's refusal to grant permission for admission to three Jharkhand medical colleges due to persistent deficiencies, dismissing petitions and directing the State to rectify shortcomings before renewal.
Gauri Shankar v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence for the appellant's brutal murder of two minor children by poisoning, rejecting procedural and sentencing challenges.
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences v. Srikeerti Reddi Pingle
The Supreme Court held that a foreign qualification must demonstrate subject-wise study and practical tests in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology at the 10+2 level to qualify for MBBS admission under MCI Regulations, setting aside the High Court’s contrary decision.
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences v. Srikeerti Reddi Pingle
The Supreme Court held that a foreign high school qualification lacking proof of study in Biology at the required level and duration does not meet the Medical Council of India’s eligibility criteria for MBBS admission, setting aside the High Court’s order allowing admission.
SUDIPTA CHAKROBARTY & ANR. v. RANAGHAT S.D. HOSPITAL & ORS.
The Supreme Court directed the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to deliver reasoned judgments along with operative orders within two months, holding that delay violates Article 21 rights and prejudices litigants.
Sudipta Chakrobarty v. Ranaghat S.D. Hospital
The Supreme Court held that delay in delivering reasoned judgments after operative orders violates Article 21 and directed that reasoned judgments must be delivered within two months to protect litigants' rights.