Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Reepak Kansal v. Union of India

30 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that while Covid-19 is a notified disaster under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the government’s relief measures including ex gratia compensation are policy decisions subject to limited judicial review, and mandated accurate death certification but declined to direct mandatory ex gratia payments to families of Covid-19 deceased.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Disaster Management Act, 2005 Covid-19 ex gratia compensation Notified Disaster

Reepak Kansal v. Union of India

30 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that while Covid-19 is a notified disaster under DMA 2005, the government’s discretion in providing relief including ex gratia compensation is subject to policy considerations and fiscal prudence, limiting judicial interference.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Disaster Management Act, 2005 Covid-19 pandemic ex gratia compensation Notified Disaster

അപതീല്‍വഭാദതി v. കകരള സപ്രീംസഭാന കറഭാഡസ് ടഭാന്‍കസഭാരടസ്

29 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Finance Act, 2006 provisions on levy of duties, interest, and penalties, affirming the powers of appellate authorities and procedural safeguards for taxpayers.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Finance Act 2006 Customs Act 1962 levy of interest penalties

അപതീല്‍വഭാദതി v. കകരള സപ്രീംസഭാന കറഭാഡസ് ടഭാന്‍കസഭാരടസ്

29 Jun 2021 · R. Subhash Reddy; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court clarified the primacy of the Arbitration Act over the Real Estate Act in enforcement and appeals, validating the 10% deposit rule while directing harmonization of procedures to avoid jurisdictional conflicts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2006 10% deposit requirement Enforcement of arbitration awards

M/s. Khyaati Engineering v. Prodigy Hydro Power Pvt. Ltd.

29 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act applies to arbitration under MSMED Act and counter claims are maintainable therein, but suppliers must be registered under MSMED Act at the time of supply to claim its benefits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant MSMED Act Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limitation Act, 1963 counter claim

Bikram Chatterji v. Union of India

29 Jun 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that La Residentia Developers is not part of the Amrapali Group beyond shareholding, rejected recall of prior orders, and allowed the Company to continue project construction with supervised sale of 632 flats to protect home buyers' interests.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Amrapali Group La Residentia Developers special purpose company home buyers

G. MOHAN RAO v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU

29 Jun 2021 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws (Revival of Operation, Amendment and Validation) Act, 2019 as a valid retrospective validating legislation under Article 254(2), allowing revival of State land acquisition laws declared void due to repugnancy with the central law.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 254 repugnancy retrospective validating legislation land acquisition

G. MOHAN RAO v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU

29 Jun 2021 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Tamil Nadu's retrospective validating legislation reviving State land acquisition laws declared void due to repugnancy with the Central Act, affirming the State's legislative competence under Article 254(2).

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 254 repugnancy retrospective validating legislation land acquisition

Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah · 2021 INSC 315

The Supreme Court directed Central and State Governments to ensure food security and welfare of migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, mandating distribution of dry ration, implementation of One Nation One Ration Card, and enforcement of labour welfare laws.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant migrant labourers COVID-19 pandemic dry ration National Food Security Act, 2013

Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court directed States and the Central Government to ensure food security, registration, and welfare of migrant and unorganized workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing implementation of the One Nation One Ration Card scheme and labour welfare laws.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant migrant labourers COVID-19 pandemic dry ration One Nation One Ration Card

The State of Odisha v. Orissa Private Engineering College Association

29 Jun 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; R Subhash Reddy; S Ravindra Bhat · 2021 INSC 312

The Supreme Court held that statutory provisions mandating entrance test-based admissions to B.Tech courses cannot be relaxed by court order, but protected admissions already granted during the COVID-19 pandemic under such relaxation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Odisha Professional Educational Institutions Act 2007 Section 3(1) B.Tech admissions AICTE circular

The State of Odisha v. Orissa Private Engineering College Association

29 Jun 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; R Subhash Reddy; S Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that admissions to B.Tech courses must comply with statutory entrance test requirements, setting aside the High Court's order permitting admissions based on qualifying marks, but allowed existing admissions for the pandemic-affected year to stand.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Odisha Professional Educational Institutions Act 2007 Section 3(1) B.Tech admissions AICTE circular

State of Kerala v. Leesamma Joseph

28 Jun 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of persons with disabilities to reservation benefits in promotions under the 1995 Act, directing the State to identify eligible posts and implement such reservation irrespective of the mode of initial appointment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 reservation in promotions PWD reservation identification of posts

The State of Kerala v. Leesamma Joseph

28 Jun 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that persons with disabilities are entitled to reservation in promotions under the 1995 Act regardless of mode of appointment, dismissing the State's appeal and directing implementation of reservation in promotions.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 reservation in promotion compassionate appointment disability quota

Sanjay Prakash & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Jun 2021 · Aniruddha Bose · 2021 INSC 310
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed impleadment of IPS officers in appeals challenging recruitment rules of CAPFs that affect deputation to senior posts, holding that affected parties with direct interest must be heard.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Armed Police Forces Indian Police Service deputation Recruitment Rules

Sanjay Prakash v. Union of India

28 Jun 2021 · Aniruddha Bose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed impleadment of IPS officers in appeals challenging CAPF Recruitment Rules, holding that officers with direct interest in deputation posts are necessary parties for effective adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Armed Police Forces Indian Police Service deputation Recruitment Rules

Shaik Ahmed v. State of Telangana

28 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 364A IPC for failure to prove threat or apprehension of death or hurt, but convicted the accused under Section 363 IPC for kidnapping.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 364A IPC kidnapping for ransom threat to cause death or hurt interpretation of conjunction and disjunction

Shaik Ahmed v. State of Telangana

28 Jun 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court set aside conviction under Section 364A IPC for failure to prove threat or reasonable apprehension of death, convicting appellant under Section 363 IPC for kidnapping instead.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 364A IPC kidnapping for ransom threat to cause death or hurt reasonable apprehension

Venigalla Koteswaramma v. Malempati Suryamba

27 Jun 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Dinesh Maheshwari; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidity of a suspicious Will but validated an unregistered agreement for sale, dismissing the partition appeal and excluding the disputed property from partition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit Will validity agreement for sale fabrication of documents

Union of India v. M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP

17 Jun 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of import restrictions on pulses, held imports under interim orders not bona fide, and allowed appeals challenging High Court orders directing release of goods on payment of redemption fine, emphasizing statutory confiscation provisions under the Customs Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 Customs Act, 1962 import restrictions confiscation