Supreme Court of India

16,357 judgments

Year:

Yogesh v. State of Haryana

06 Apr 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court acquitted accused in a murder and kidnapping case due to failure of prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence and unreliable eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence benefit of doubt eyewitness testimony sexual assault

Shanmugam v. State by Inspector of Police

06 Apr 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta · 2021 INSC 230

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC murder chain of circumstances

Shanmugam v. State by Inspector of Police

06 Apr 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the findings of the lower courts.

criminal appeal_dismissed circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC murder conviction chain of circumstances

Gurdev Singh v. State of Punjab

06 Apr 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah · 2021 INSC 232

The Supreme Court upheld a 15-year sentence under the NDPS Act for possession of 1 kg heroin, ruling that courts may consider quantity and other relevant factors beyond Section 32B when imposing punishment higher than the minimum.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 21 Section 32B sentence enhancement

Gurdev Singh v. State of Punjab

06 Apr 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah

The Supreme Court upheld a 15-year sentence under the NDPS Act, ruling that courts may consider drug quantity and other relevant factors beyond Section 32B when imposing punishment above the minimum term.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 21 Section 32B sentence enhancement

Chandrabhan v. State of Maharashtra

06 Apr 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of a false Scheduled Tribe claim and the consequent withdrawal of benefits, affirming that only Parliament can amend the Scheduled Tribes list and that false caste claims cannot be protected by judicial relief.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Tribes Order Article 342 caste certificate false claim

M. Sampat v. State of Chhattisgarh

05 Apr 2021 · Indira Banerjee; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a truck helper under the NDPS Act for transporting large quantity of 'Ganja' but reduced his sentence considering his limited role and mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(C) Ganja narcotic drugs

M. Sampat v. The State of Chhattisgarh

05 Apr 2021 · Indira Banerjee; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a truck helper for transporting large quantities of Ganja under the NDPS Act but reduced his sentence considering his limited role and mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(C) Ganja narcotic drugs

Sonu v. Sonu Yadav

05 Apr 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a dowry death case for lack of reasons, emphasizing the necessity of judicial application of mind in bail decisions involving serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC

Sonu v. Sonu Yadav

05 Apr 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a dowry death case for lack of proper judicial reasoning, emphasizing the need for detailed reasons in bail orders involving serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC

Kiran Devi v. Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board

05 Apr 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that tenancy rights are individual contractual rights not joint Hindu family property, upheld the Wakf Tribunal's order validating surrender of tenancy by the Karta, and restored the appellant's tenancy against the High Court's contrary order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Wakf Tribunal jurisdiction joint Hindu family tenancy surrender of tenancy Karta authority

Kiran Devi v. The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board

05 Apr 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that tenancy rights held individually by a member of a joint Hindu family are not joint family property and upheld the validity of surrender of tenancy by the Karta, restoring the Wakf Tribunal's order and setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Wakf Tribunal jurisdiction Joint Hindu Family Karta powers Tenancy rights

Indus Biotech Private Limited v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund

26 Mar 2021 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the IB Code become non-arbitrable only upon admission after judicial determination of default, and until then, disputes involving conversion of preference shares remain arbitrable, directing constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 IB Code Section 8 Arbitration Act

Indus Biotech Private Limited v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund

26 Mar 2021 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the IB Code become non-arbitrable only upon admission after default is established, and until then, disputes involving conversion of preference shares remain arbitrable, directing constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal to resolve the dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 petition Section 8 application

Jagmohan Singh Dhillon v. Satwant Singh

26 Mar 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that ex-servicemen appointed under the 1982 Rules are not entitled to seniority benefits under the repealed 1972 Rules, and seniority must be determined as per the rules in force at appointment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant ex-servicemen reservation seniority fixation 1972 Rules 1982 Rules

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jail Superintendent (Ropar)

26 Mar 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy · 2021 INSC 223

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition directing transfer of custody of a sitting MLA from Punjab to Uttar Pradesh jail but refused to transfer the Punjab criminal case, clarifying maintainability and procedural safeguards under Article 32 and Section 406 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant custody transfer Section 406 Cr.P.C. Article 32 Constitution MP/MLA Special Court

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jail Superintendent (Ropar) & Ors.

26 Mar 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held the writ petition maintainable and directed Punjab authorities to transfer custody of accused Mukhtar Ansari to Uttar Pradesh for trial before the Special Court, balancing procedural and medical considerations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant custody transfer Section 406 Cr.P.C. Article 32 Constitution Special Court MPs/MLAs

Association for Democratic Reforms & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Mar 2021 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian · 2021 INSC 222

The Supreme Court upheld the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018, dismissing petitions challenging its constitutionality and rejecting interim relief to stay further issuance, holding that adequate safeguards ensure transparency and accountability in political funding.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018 political funding transparency donor anonymity Finance Act, 2016 and 2017

Suresh Kumar v. State of Haryana & Ors.

26 Mar 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the eight-year service eligibility criterion under Punjab Police Rules, 1934 for promotion from Sub-Inspector to Inspector, dismissing challenges to the promotion orders and related rules.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Punjab Police Rules, 1934 promotion eligibility selection grade Sub-Inspector to Inspector promotion

Rajendra @ Rajappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka

26 Mar 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellants for murder under Section 302 read with 149 IPC, reversing the trial court's acquittal as perverse and unsupported by evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC common object