Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Mallappa v. State of Karnataka

07 May 2021 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction for murder due to contradictory prosecution evidence and upheld the Trial Court's acquittal of the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder fratricide eyewitness credibility

Chief Election Commissioner of India v. M.R Vijayabhaskar

06 May 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah · 2021 INSC 286

The Supreme Court upheld the media's right to report oral observations made during open court proceedings, rejected the Election Commission's plea to restrain such reporting, and emphasized judicial restraint and accountability within constitutional bounds.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Open court principle Freedom of speech and expression Media reporting of judicial proceedings Judicial conduct and propriety

Chief Election Commissioner of India v. M.R Vijayabhaskar

06 May 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the principle of open courts and media freedom to report judicial proceedings, rejecting the Election Commission's plea to restrain reporting of oral observations made by the Madras High Court regarding COVID-19 protocols during elections.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Open court principle Freedom of speech and expression Media reporting of judicial proceedings Judicial conduct and propriety

Guru Dutt Pathak v. State of Uttar Pradesh

06 May 2021 · M. R. Shah; Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming that appellate courts may interfere with acquittals if the trial court's findings are perverse or unsustainable on evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 378 CrPC

Guru Dutt Pathak v. State of Uttar Pradesh

06 May 2021 · M. R. Shah; Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction under Section 302 IPC, affirming that appellate courts may reappreciate evidence and interfere with acquittals if trial court findings are perverse or unsustainable.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC eyewitness testimony related witnesses

DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL v. THE CHIEF MINISTER

05 May 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; S. Abdul Nazeer; L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gup... · 2021 INSC 284

The Supreme Court upheld Maharashtra's reservation for Maratha community under SEBC Act, 2018, affirming State's legislative power and exceptional circumstances to exceed 50% reservation ceiling, while partially striking down excess quota.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation socially and educationally backward classes Maratha community 50% ceiling

DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL v. THE CHIEF MINISTER

05 May 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; S. Abdul Nazeer; L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gup...
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld Maharashtra's reservation for Maratha community as constitutionally valid under Articles 15(4) and 16(4), affirmed the 50% reservation ceiling can be exceeded in exceptional cases, but struck down the quantum exceeding the Commission's recommendations, and clarified the impact of the 102nd Amendment on State powers.

constitutional appeal_allowed_in_part Significant reservation socially and educationally backward classes Maratha community 50% ceiling

Forum for People’s Collective Efforts v. The State of West Bengal

04 May 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah · 2021 INSC 283

The Supreme Court struck down the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 for being repugnant to the central Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 and lacking required Presidential assent under Article 254(2).

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 254(2) Concurrent List Repugnancy Real Estate Regulation

Forum for People’s Collective Efforts v. The State of West Bengal

04 May 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; M R Shah

The Supreme Court struck down the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 for lack of Presidential assent and repugnancy with the Central Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, affirming the primacy of Central law on Concurrent List subjects.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 254 Concurrent List Repugnancy Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

INDIAN SCHOOL, JODHPUR & ANR. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

03 May 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2021 INSC 281

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016, affirming the State's regulatory authority over private unaided school fees as a reasonable restriction on the autonomy under Article 19(1)(g).

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 19(1)(g) private unaided schools school fee regulation Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016

Indian School, Jodhpur & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

03 May 2021 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016, affirming the State's power to regulate private unaided school fees subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(1)(g).

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 19(1)(g) private unaided schools school fee regulation Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited v. E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

03 May 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; VINEET SARAN
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that the Scheduled Commissioning Date for solar projects is 12 calendar months excluding the effective date, upheld the Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing commissioning within time, and set aside penalties imposed for alleged delay.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Scheduled Commissioning Date Liquidated Damages Solar Power Project

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited v. E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

03 May 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; VINEET SARAN
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the Scheduled Commissioning Date for solar projects is 12 calendar months excluding the approval date, and since commissioning occurred within this period, tariff reduction and liquidated damages were unjustified.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Commissioning Date Power Purchase Agreement Solar Power Project Liquidated Damages

Sukhbir v. Ajit Singh

30 Apr 2021 · M. R. Shah; Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud · 2021 INSC 279

The Supreme Court held that when land is compulsorily acquired during a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff is entitled to compensation under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act in lieu of specific performance, subject to deductions for expenses incurred by the vendor.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant specific performance land acquisition Section 21 Specific Relief Act compensation

Sukhbir v. Ajit Singh

30 Apr 2021 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that when land is compulsorily acquired during a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff is entitled to compensation under the Land Acquisition Act in lieu of specific performance, subject to deductions for expenses incurred by the original owner.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant specific performance land acquisition Section 21 Specific Relief Act compensation

Jharkhand State Electricity Board v. M/S Ramkrishna Forging Limited

30 Apr 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that successive load enhancement agreements are amendments to the initial electricity supply agreement, and an application for reduction of load filed after three years from the initial agreement must be allowed under the Jharkhand Electricity Supply Code Regulations, dismissing the Board's appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant contract demand sanctioned load electricity supply agreement reduction of load

Jharkhand State Electricity Board v. M/S Ramkrishna Forging Limited

30 Apr 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that successive load enhancement agreements are supplementary to the initial electricity supply agreement and do not reset the initial period restricting load reduction under Jharkhand Electricity Supply Code Regulations, allowing the consumer's application for load reduction.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant contract demand sanctioned load electricity supply agreement load enhancement

IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMIC

30 Apr 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; L Nageswara Rao; S Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court directed the Central Government to ensure uniform hospital admission policies, equitable oxygen and vaccine supply, and reconsider decentralized vaccine procurement to uphold constitutional rights during the COVID-19 pandemic.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Disaster Management Act, 2005 COVID-19 pandemic oxygen supply vaccine distribution

Commissioner of Income Tax-I v. M/s. Reliance Energy Ltd

28 Apr 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; VINEET SARAN

The Supreme Court held that deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act is allowable against the gross total income and not restricted only to business income, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80-IA Income Tax Act Section 80AB Income Tax Act deduction against gross total income business income

Commissioner of Income Tax-I v. M/s. Reliance Energy Ltd.

28 Apr 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; VINEET SARAN

The Supreme Court held that deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is allowable against the gross total income and not restricted to business income alone.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80-IA Section 80AB Income Tax Act, 1961 deduction