Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Suraz India Trust v. Union of India

29 Sep 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that frivolous PILs and motivated attempts to scandalize the judiciary constitute contempt, upheld exemplary costs, and directed recovery while rejecting conditional apologies.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant contempt of court public interest litigation exemplary costs Article 129 Constitution

Rajasthan v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

29 Sep 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that a Single Judge cannot issue blanket orders restricting bail applications or arrests during the COVID-19 lockdown, as such orders infringe on the Chief Justice's administrative powers and constitutional rights of accused persons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail applications administrative power Chief Justice COVID-19 pandemic

State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Shaheena Masarat

29 Sep 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; SANJIV KHANNA · 2021 INSC 573

The Supreme Court held that the upper age limit for appointment under the Re-T scheme is mandatory, set aside the appointment of an overage candidate, upheld the appointment of the eligible candidate, and clarified that eligibility criteria for public posts must be strictly followed to ensure constitutional fairness.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rehbar-e-Taleem scheme upper age limit public appointment eligibility Articles 14 and 16

State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Shaheena Masarat

29 Sep 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; SANJIV KHANNA

The Supreme Court held that the upper age limit for appointment under the Re-T scheme is mandatory, invalidated the appointment of an overage candidate, and upheld the appointment of the eligible candidate while setting aside the continuation of both in the same post.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rehbar-e-Taleem scheme upper age limit mandatory eligibility criteria public employment

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v. R.C. SRIVASTAVA

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2021 INSC 574

The Supreme Court held that an Industrial Tribunal cannot reappraise evidence or substitute findings of a fair domestic enquiry and allowed the employer's appeal upholding dismissal for misconduct.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic enquiry Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 11-A standard of proof

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v. R.C. SRIVASTAVA

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that Industrial Tribunals cannot reappreciate evidence or apply criminal standards in domestic enquiries and upheld the dismissal of a workman for gross misconduct, setting aside the reinstatement order.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic enquiry industrial disputes act Section 11-A preponderance of probabilities

Krishna v. Unknown

29 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2021 INSC 570

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of an ex parte decree and auction sale by confirming proper service of summons via registered post and dismissed the application to set aside the decree as barred and without merit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree service of summons registered post Order IX Rule 13 CPC

Krishna v. Unknown

29 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that summons sent by registered post with refusal endorsement constitute valid service, and set aside the High Court's orders allowing the appellant to challenge an ex parte decree, restoring the decree in favor of the respondent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree service of summons registered post Order IX Rule 13 CPC

Vishwabandhu v. Sri Krishna

29 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that summons returned with refusal by registered post constitute valid service, and a party with knowledge of proceedings cannot set aside an ex parte decree after auction and sale certificate issuance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC service of summons registered post

ADANI GAS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

28 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld that deemed authorization under Section 16 of the PNGRB Act applies only to entities authorized by the Central Government before the appointed day, validating Regulation 18 and dismissing Adani’s challenge to the exclusion of disputed areas from its authorization.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant PNGRB Act Section 16 deemed authorization Regulation 18 CGD Regulations natural gas distribution

ADANI GAS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

28 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld that deemed authorization under Section 16 of the PNGRB Act applies only to entities authorized by the Central Government before the appointed day, validating Regulation 18 and dismissing Adani's challenge to the exclusion of disputed areas from its authorization.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 Section 16 deemed authorization Regulation 18 CGD Regulations City or Local Natural Gas Distribution Network

EMPLOYEES’ STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION v. KAKINADA MUNICIPALITY

28 Sep 2021 · K. M. Joseph; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that factories run by local authorities are covered under the Employees’ State Insurance Act unless exempted by the appropriate Government, and the Insurance Court lacks jurisdiction to grant such exemption.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 1(4) Section 75(1)(g) Section 90 exemption

Khatema Fibres Ltd v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr

28 Sep 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's settlement based on the surveyor's volumetric loss assessment, dismissing the appellant's consumer complaint for higher compensation and deficiency in service.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Insurance claim Surveyor's report Volumetric analysis Deficiency in service

Khatema Fibres Ltd v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr

28 Sep 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's surveyor-assessed compensation in a fire insurance claim, ruling no deficiency in service existed and limiting consumer forum jurisdiction to such findings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance claim surveyor's report volumetric analysis deficiency in service

KHARAGPUR v. SOUTRIK SARANGI

28 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi · 2021 INSC 559

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of JEE (Advanced) eligibility Criterion 5 disallowing candidates admitted to IITs from reappearing, rejecting the High Court’s finding of arbitrariness and discrimination.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant JEE Advanced eligibility Criterion 5 IIT admission policy arbitrariness

KHARAGPUR v. SOUTRIK SARANGI

28 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of JEE (Advanced) eligibility Criterion 5 disallowing candidates admitted to IITs from reappearing, emphasizing judicial deference to academic admission policies and rejecting claims of arbitrariness or discrimination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant JEE Advanced eligibility IIT admission criteria Criterion 5 arbitrariness

Bulandshahr Khurja Development Authority v. Amir Kuwar Dead Thr. Lrs and Others

28 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2021 INSC 567

The Supreme Court directed transfer of disputed compensation amounts to the High Court for final adjudication and ordered release of undisputed compensation shares to claimants, declining to decide calculation disputes at the interlocutory stage.

civil other compensation land acquisition calculation dispute deposit

Bulandshahr Khurja Development Authority v. Amir Kuwar Dead Thr. Lrs and Others

28 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court directed interim release of deposited compensation amounts to respondents while remitting disputed calculation and distribution issues to the High Court for final adjudication.

civil other compensation land acquisition calculation dispute interim release

Telecommunication, BSNL & Ors. v. Vidya Prasad

28 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S Oka · 2021 INSC 564

The Supreme Court held that delay by the employer in considering a compassionate appointment application entitles the eligible dependent to compensation in lieu of employment when delay causes loss of eligibility.

labor appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment delay in service right to fair consideration public employment

Telecommunication, BSNL v. Vidya Prasad

28 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S Oka
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that delay by BSNL in processing a compassionate appointment application entitled the respondent to compensation but not appointment due to age, modifying the High Court's award accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment delay in service public employment administrative delay