Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Prem Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar & Anr.

21 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an accused declared absconder under sections 82 and 83 CrPC is not entitled to anticipatory bail and set aside the High Court's grant of anticipatory bail in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail proclamation under section 82 CrPC absconding accused sections 406 and 420 IPC

Prem Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar

21 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an accused declared a proclaimed offender under sections 82 and 83 CrPC is not entitled to anticipatory bail and set aside the High Court's grant of such bail in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail proclaimed offender sections 82 and 83 CrPC sections 406 and 420 IPC

Valsan P. v. The State of Kerala

21 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna · 2021 INSC 656
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the State Government can condone a break caused by intervening non-pensionable service between Central and State Government pensionable services to grant pension benefits, restoring the tribunal's order and allowing the appeal.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pensionary benefits break in service condonation Kerala Service Rules

Valsan P. v. Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad

21 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the Government of Kerala's lawful cancellation of mining leases under Rule 29 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, setting aside the High Court's order restoring the leases.

property appeal_allowed Significant mining lease cancellation Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules Rule 29

Valsan P. v. The State of Kerala

21 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that a break caused by intervening non-pensionable service between Central and State Government pensionable services can be condoned under State Government rules and orders to reckon prior service for pension benefits.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pensionary benefits break in service condonation Kerala Service Rules

Vaibhavi Enterprise v. Nobel Cera Coat

21 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna · 2021 INSC 657

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's ex-parte order permitting bid modification without hearing other parties and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with all parties heard.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition natural justice modification of bids

Vaibhavi Enterprise v. Nobel Cera Coat

21 Oct 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order permitting unilateral bid modification without hearing other bidders, emphasizing natural justice and proper party impleadment in writ proceedings under Article 226.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition natural justice competitive bidding

Kavitha Lankesh v. State of Karnataka & Ors.

21 Oct 2021 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of prior approval under Section 24(1)(a) of KCOCA for recording organized crime information, set aside the High Court's quashing of chargesheet, and clarified the scope of invocation of organized crime provisions against accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 Section 24(1)(a) prior approval organized crime

Kavitha Lankesh v. State of Karnataka & Ors.

21 Oct 2021 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari; C.T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of prior approval under Section 24(1)(a) of KCOCA for recording organized crime information and set aside the High Court's quashing of the chargesheet against Mohan Nayak.N.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 Section 24(1)(a) prior approval organized crime

Vaishno Devi Construction v. Union of India

21 Oct 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; B. R. Gavai · 2021 INSC 655

The Supreme Court held that the 1976 amendment to Order XXI Rule 16 CPC permits assignees of rights in the subject matter of a suit to execute decrees without separate assignment of the decree, allowing executing courts to decide such claims under Section 47 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI Rule 16 CPC Section 146 CPC Assignment of decree Execution of decree

Vaishno Devi Construction v. Union of India

21 Oct 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; B. R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that the 1976 amendment to Order XXI Rule 16 CPC allows assignees of rights in the subject matter of a suit to apply for execution of a decree without separate assignment of the decree, remitting the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI Rule 16 CPC Section 146 CPC Assignment of decree Execution of decree

Balram Garg v. Securities and Exchange Board of India; Shivani Gupta & Ors. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India

21 Oct 2021 · Vineet Saran; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside SEBI and SAT orders penalizing appellants for insider trading, holding that SEBI failed to prove possession or communication of UPSI beyond circumstantial evidence and that familial estrangement negated insider status.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Insider Trading Unpublished Price Sensitive Information SEBI (PIT) Regulations 2015 Burden of Proof

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. The State of Maharashtra

20 Oct 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Vikram Nath; BV Nagarathna · 2021 INSC 649
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that State police may continue investigation under Section 6(7) of the NIA Act until the NIA takes over, and that jurisdiction of Special Courts for scheduled offences attaches only after NIA assumes investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NIA Act Section 6(7) Special Court jurisdiction UAPA

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

20 Oct 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Vikram Nath; BV Nagarathna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that State police may continue investigation under Section 6(7) of the NIA Act until the NIA takes over, and that jurisdiction of Special Courts to try scheduled offences attaches only after investigation is complete, validating the charge-sheet and committal by State courts prior to NIA takeover.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NIA Act Section 6 NIA Act Scheduled Offences UAPA

M/S DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

20 Oct 2021 · B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal as withdrawn on the petitioner's application stating the issues had become academic.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal withdrawal academic issue dismissal of appeal Supreme Court

Jaswant Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr

20 Oct 2021 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant under Sections 406/420 IPC, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be exercised to prevent abuse of process and secure justice where the offence is predominantly civil and compromise has been reached.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compounding of offence economic offences

State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Narayan Sai

20 Oct 2021 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; B V Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that furlough is a discretionary relief, not a right, and upheld denial of furlough to a life-convict due to credible risks to public peace and judicial process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant furlough parole Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules, 1959 life imprisonment

Uma Shanker Sharma v. The Registrar General

20 Oct 2021 · B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal as abated due to the death of the sole appellant during its pendency.

criminal appeal_dismissed appeal abatement death of appellant criminal appeal Supreme Court

A.T. Mydeen and Another v. The Assistant Commissioner

19 Oct 2021 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Vikram Nath; B. V. Nagarathna · 2021 INSC 697
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that evidence recorded in one criminal trial cannot be used to convict accused in a separate trial for the same offence, setting aside the High Court's common judgment and remanding the appeals for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant separate trials evidence admissibility right to fair trial cross-examination

Dr. Yashwantrao Bhaskarrao Deshmukh v. Raghunath Kisan Saindane

08 Oct 2021 · Indira Banerjee; J. K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a second appeal as time-barred, directing condonation of delay and reconsideration of the appeal on merits in a suit for specific performance where non-service of notice due to change of address was established.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay specific performance ex parte decree notice by publication