Supreme Court of India
8,182 judgments
PANI RAM v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court held that a Territorial Army member injured in service is entitled to disability pension under statutory regulations despite contrary departmental orders, emphasizing the supremacy of statutory rules and equality under the Constitution.
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Noor Mohammad
The Supreme Court held that a Notification releasing land from acquisition under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act can be rescinded by the government if obtained by fraud, as such Notifications are administrative and do not create vested rights immune from cancellation.
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Noor Mohammad
The Supreme Court held that a notification releasing land from acquisition under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act can be rescinded by the Government under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, especially when obtained by fraud, and set aside the High Court's order quashing such rescindment.
Safiq Ahmad v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Supreme Court directed the Ministry of Transport to suggest pan-India measures to curb fraudulent motor vehicle and workmen compensation claims, emphasizing strict enforcement of statutory provisions and disciplinary action against errant advocates.
Safiq Ahmad v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Supreme Court directed expedited investigation and disciplinary action against fraudulent compensation claims under Motor Vehicles and Workmen Compensation Acts, emphasizing statutory compliance and technological reforms to curb the menace.
State of Bihar v. Madhu Kant Ranjan
The Supreme Court held that a candidate who fails to submit required documents by the cut-off date as per recruitment advertisement is not entitled to additional marks for such documents submitted later, and quashed the High Court's direction for appointment with such marks.
Majji Sannemma v. Reddy Sridevi
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order condoning a 1011-day delay in filing a second appeal, holding that such a huge unexplained delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.
Secretary to Govt. Department of Education (Primary) & Ors. v. Bheemesh Alias Bheemappa
The Supreme Court held that amendments expanding compassionate appointment benefits do not apply retrospectively and entitlement is governed by the rules in force on the date of the government servant's death.
Secretary to Govt. Department of Education (Primary) & Ors. v. Bheemesh Alias Bheemappa
The Supreme Court held that amendments enlarging benefits under compassionate appointment rules do not apply retrospectively and the scheme in force on the date of death governs eligibility.
ANITA RANI v. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS
The Supreme Court held that the respondents failed to prove full and final settlement or authorization of withdrawals, restoring the decrees in favor of the appellant for recovery of money with interest under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act.
P. SATYANARAYANA v. NANDYALA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s grant of interim injunction protecting the respondent’s possession of agricultural land, holding that ownership under Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act prevails over the petitioner’s claim under a Gift Settlement Deed.
P. Satyanarayana v. Nandyala Rama Krishna Reddy
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's grant of interim injunction to the purchaser of agricultural land holding title under tenancy law, dismissing the petition challenging the validity of the gift deed and prior suit dismissal.
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. v. Maheshbhai Tinabhai Rathod & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is absolute and excludes the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, thus delay beyond the prescribed period cannot be condoned.
IL and FS Engineering and Constructions Company Ltd. v. M/s. Bhargavarama Constructions
The Supreme Court held that a first appellate court must decide appeals on merits and cannot set aside a trial court decree solely on impleadment grounds without reasons, remanding the matter for proper adjudication.
M/S STAR PAPER MILLS LIMITED v. M/S BEHARILAL MADANLAL JAIPURIA LTD.
The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that the respondents failed to prove the alleged fraud and that duly signed invoices and ST-1 Forms constitute sufficient proof of genuine transactions for recovery of dues.
Sadhana Singh Dangi v. Pinki Asati
The Supreme Court held that reserved category women candidates scoring higher merit are entitled to unreserved category seats under horizontal reservation, overruling the Madhya Pradesh High Court and upholding the revised Select List published by MPPSC.
IL and FS Engineering and Constructions Company Ltd. v. M/s. Bhargavarama Constructions
The Supreme Court held that a first appellate court must decide appeals on merits and cannot set aside trial court decrees solely on impleadment grounds without proper adjudication, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
A.T. Mydeen and Another v. The Assistant Commissioner
The Supreme Court held that evidence recorded in one criminal trial cannot be used to convict accused tried separately in another trial, set aside the High Court's common judgment, and remanded the appeals for fresh disposal.
The Bordeuri Samaj of Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya v. Riju Prasad Sarma & Ors.
The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions alleging breach of its 2015 judgment on Kamakhya Temple management, holding that prima facie misappropriation findings do not warrant contempt without conclusive adjudication.