Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Rajenbhai Baldevbhai Shah v. Baijiben Kabhaibhai Patanwadia

25 Aug 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition for lack of any error apparent on the record and condoned the delay in filing the petition.

civil petition_dismissed review petition error apparent on record delay condonation Supreme Court

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Another v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another

24 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the grant of compound interest on carrying cost from the date of the Change in Law event under the restitutionary principles of the Power Purchase Agreements, dismissing the appellants' challenge to limit interest to simple interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Change in Law carrying cost compound interest Power Purchase Agreement

National Highways Authority of India v. Sheetal Jaidev Vade & Ors.

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 861

The Supreme Court held that execution of an arbitral award challenged under Section 34 must proceed through execution proceedings before the competent court, disallowing writ petitions under Article 226 for execution, and directed partial deposit and release of compensation pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Execution Article 226 Constitution Section 34 Arbitration Act National Highways Authority of India

National Highways Authority of India v. Sheetal Jaidev Vade & Ors.

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that execution of an arbitral award challenged under Section 34 must be pursued before the Executing Court and disapproved High Courts entertaining writ petitions under Article 226 for execution, directing partial deposit and conditional release of compensation pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award execution Section 34 Arbitration Act Article 226 Constitution Land acquisition compensation

Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra

24 Aug 2022 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Surya Kant
Cites 4 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that confessions under MCOCA must be recorded by police officers not below the rank of Superintendent of Police, and confessions recorded by Additional Superintendents without statutory empowerment are inadmissible, invalidating the invocation of MCOCA in this case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act Section 18 MCOCA confession admissibility Additional Superintendent of Police

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vadodara – I v. M/s Jyoti Limited

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that erection and installation services incidental to sale of goods constitute works contracts and not consulting engineering services liable to service tax, dismissing the Revenue’s appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax consulting engineering services works contract erection and installation

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vadodara – I v. M/s Jyoti Limited

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that erection, installation, and commissioning activities by a manufacturer do not constitute consulting engineering services liable to service tax, dismissing the Revenue’s appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax consulting engineering services works contract erection and installation

Rajbir Singh v. State of Punjab

24 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a poisoning murder case due to incomplete and doubtful circumstantial evidence, emphasizing strict adherence to the principles governing conviction on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence poisoning organophosphorus compound Section 302 IPC

Rajbir Singh v. State of Punjab

24 Aug 2022 · Hemant Gupta; Vikram Nath
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a poisoning murder case due to incomplete circumstantial evidence, unreliable chemical reports, and lack of medical corroboration, emphasizing strict adherence to principles governing circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence poisoning organophosphorus compound motive

Pushpendra Kumar Sinha v. State of Jharkhand

24 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; J.K. Maheshwari; Hima Kohli
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court discharged the Executive Engineer from corruption and criminal conspiracy charges, holding that no prima facie case was made out against him at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant charge framing prima facie case Section 239 Cr.P.C. Prevention of Corruption Act

Pushpendra Kumar Sinha v. State of Jharkhand

24 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; J.K. Maheshwari; Hima Kohli
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court discharged the Executive Engineer accused of corruption charges, holding that no prima facie case existed against him given his lack of decision-making authority and absence of dishonest intent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. prima facie case arbitral award decision-making authority

State of Tripura v. Anjana Bhattacharjee

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a State policy fixing a cut-off date for revised pension payments based on financial constraints, reversing the High Court's order striking down the rule as arbitrary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pension revision financial constraints policy decision Article 14

State of Tripura v. Anjana Bhattacharjee

24 Aug 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a State policy fixing a cut-off date for payment of revised pension benefits based on financial constraints, reversing the High Court's order striking down the rule as arbitrary under Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pension revision financial constraints Article 14 policy decision

ST. MARY’S EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR. v. RAJENDRA PRASAD BHARGAVA & ORS.

24 Aug 2022 · ANIRUDDHA BOSE; J.B. PARDIWALA

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable against private unaided minority educational institutions in service disputes lacking a public law element.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ petition maintainability private unaided minority educational institution Article 226 Constitution of India public law element

Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary

23 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli · 2022 INSC 851

The Supreme Court referred crucial constitutional questions on the Speaker's disqualification powers and related issues under the Tenth Schedule to a larger bench for authoritative clarification.

constitutional other Significant Tenth Schedule disqualification Speaker powers Governor discretion

Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary

23 Aug 2022 · N.V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court referred important constitutional questions on legislative disqualification and Speaker's powers under the Tenth Schedule to a larger bench for authoritative clarification.

constitutional other Significant Tenth Schedule disqualification Speaker powers Governor discretion

Md. Islam & Ors. v. Bihar State Electricity Board & Ors.

23 Aug 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that the Bihar State Electricity Board validly adapted the ACP Scheme prospectively from 2005, denying retrospective benefits from 1999 to employees who retired earlier, and dismissed the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Bihar State Electricity Board service conditions adaptation of scheme

Md. Islam & Ors. v. Bihar State Electricity Board & Ors.

23 Aug 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the Bihar State Electricity Board's adaptation of the ACP Scheme applied prospectively from 2005, denying retrospective benefits to employees retired earlier, and dismissed the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Bihar State Electricity Board service conditions retrospective applicability

MY PALACE MUTUALLY AIDED CO­OPERATIVE SOCIETY v. B. MAHESH & ORS.

23 Aug 2022 · N. V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to recall a final decree when alternate remedies exist, setting aside the High Court's recall order obtained on grounds of alleged fraud and delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 151 CPC recall of decree inherent powers final decree

MY PALACE MUTUALLY AIDED CO­OPERATIVE SOCIETY v. B. MAHESH

23 Aug 2022 · N. V. Ramana; Krishna Murari; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court held that a final decree cannot be recalled under Section 151 CPC when alternate remedies exist, setting aside the High Court's recall order and emphasizing procedural safeguards against misuse of inherent powers.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 151 CPC recall of decree inherent powers fraud on court