High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Sunilkumar More v. CBI BS & FB and The State of Maharashtra

23 Jul 2025 · S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court held that while prior court permission for foreign travel during trial is a reasonable restriction, mandatory deposit of passport with the investigating agency is an unreasonable restriction on personal liberty and thus waived that condition.

criminal petition_allowed Significant anticipatory bail passport renewal fundamental right to travel reasonable restrictions

Aditya Ramchandra Patil & Ors. v. Yuvraj Bhivaji Patil & Ors.

23 Jul 2025 · Shivkumar Dige

The Bombay High Court held that a death caused by a saree entanglement leading to a motorcycle accident qualifies as an accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, entitling claimants to compensation despite presence of minor children on the vehicle.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act accident insurance liability compensation

Krishnagopal B. Nangpal v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

22 Jul 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; Sandeep V. Marne, J

The Bombay High Court held that prior to the 2014 amendment, exemption under Section 54(1) of the Income Tax Act applies to investment in multiple residential houses against capital gains from sale of a single residential house.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 54(1) Income Tax Act capital gains exemption residential house plural houses

Deena Pramod Baldota v. Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority

22 Jul 2025 · Kamal Khata

The High Court held that the limitation period for appeal under Section 17(6) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act starts from the final compensation determination notice, not from a preliminary notice, and restored the appeal for adjudication on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Section 17(5) Section 17(6) limitation period

Dhwaja Shares And Securities Private Limited v. Sunita A. Khatod & Ors.

22 Jul 2025 · Somasekhar Sundaresan

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards that arbitrarily reduced claims by 50% without legal basis, holding that regulatory violations do not render trades unauthorized when clients consciously participate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Stock broker liability SEBI Circulars

Anil Subhash Sawant v. Samadhan Mahadeo Autade & Ors.

21 Jul 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the election petition for non-compliance with mandatory statutory requirements, emphasizing the necessity of pleading material facts and demonstrating material effect on election results under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Election Petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 81 RP Act Section 82 RP Act

The State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohd. Vakil Ansari

21 Jul 2025 · ANIL S. KILOR; SHYAM C. CHANDAK

The Bombay High Court upheld the convictions and death sentences of accused in the 2006 Mumbai train bomb blasts case, affirming the application of MCOCA and UAPA in prosecuting organized terrorist conspiracy.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Mumbai train bomb blasts 2006 terrorism MCOCA UAPA

Make India Impex v. Union of India

19 Jul 2025 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court held that coercive retrieval of cleared goods without lawful authority or due process under the Customs Act is illegal and directed issuance of a show cause notice before any further action.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 47 Section 106 Out of Charge order

Vijay Shridhar Ghare v. Ashok Narayan Shinde

18 Jul 2025 · M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court upheld the invalidation of a sale deed executed by a Karta without legal necessity, holding the suit within limitation and dismissing the purchaser's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint Hindu family Karta alienation of ancestral property legal necessity

Ningbo Aux Imp and Exp Co Ltd v. Amstrad Consumer India Pvt Ltd

18 Jul 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court held that a foreign arbitral award cannot be enforced against a non-party to the arbitration proceedings and vacated disclosure orders against such non-party, directing their deletion from the enforcement petition.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement arbitration agreement non-party

V.M. Salgaocar and Bro. Ltd. v. M.V. Priyamvada and V.S. Dempo 1&Co. Ltd.

17 Jul 2025 · N.J. Jamadar · 2025:BHC-OS:11097

The Bombay High Court held M.V. Priyamvada liable for collision damage to M.V. Sanjeevani due to negligence in manning and navigation during a cyclonic storm, awarding damages with contributory negligence and allowing limitation of liability under the Merchant Shipping Act.

maritime/criminal appeal_allowed Significant maritime collision anchor dragging safe manning rules vessel seaworthiness

Ashok Basvanappa Holkunde & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

17 Jul 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR against in-laws under Section 498-A IPC due to vague allegations, holding that continuation would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC quashing of FIR abuse of process vague allegations

wp26862024 3756123a

17 Jul 2025 · S.M. Modak
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court quashed a criminal defamation complaint arising from matrimonial allegations of impotency, holding such imputations fall within IPC exceptions and no process should issue against the accused.

criminal petition_allowed Significant defamation Section 499 IPC exceptions quashing petition Article 227 Constitution

Priya Aashish Bodas v. Aashish Rajiv Bodas

17 Jul 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Dr. Neela Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Family Court’s dismissal of the restitution of conjugal rights petition and granted divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, rejecting the appellant’s maintenance claim raised for the first time on appeal.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 restitution of conjugal rights cruelty desertion

Harshad Suresh Sonawane v. The State of Maharashtra & Puja Harshad Sonawane

17 Jul 2025 · Manjusha Deshpande · 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 156

The High Court upheld the maintainability of a domestic violence complaint and dismissed the challenge to a conditional stay order requiring deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs, holding that the marriage is presumed valid until declared void by a competent court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 domestic relationship void marriage maintenance

Anil Baburao Baile v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Jul 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Dr. Neela Gokhale · 2025:BHC-AS:29833-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, dismissing the petition challenging its provisions and the NIA notice issued to the petitioner.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act constitutional validity preventive detention Article 22

Sameer Subhash Patil v. The State of Maharashtra and others

16 Jul 2025 · G.S. Kulkarni; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court condemned municipal officers' failure to prevent illegal occupation of commercial premises without Occupation Certificate, directed remedial action, and constituted a special committee to reform municipal governance and reduce litigation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant unauthorized occupation Occupation Certificate Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act

Sameer Subhash Patil v. The State of Maharashtra and others

16 Jul 2025 · G.S. Kulkarni; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court held that unauthorized occupation without an Occupation Certificate violates municipal laws, condemned municipal officers' dereliction of duty, and mandated accountability and remedial governance reforms.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Occupation Certificate Illegal occupation Municipal Corporation Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act

Pfizer Limited v. M/S. Shivalik Exports Corporation and Others

16 Jul 2025 · Abhay Ahuja

The Court held that substitution of legal heirs after abatement requires strict compliance with limitation periods and notice to proposed parties, and adjourned the application for substitution pending such notice and hearing.

civil other Significant Order XXII CPC substitution of legal representatives abatement of suit limitation period

Union of India v. Hanumant Yellappa Bajal

16 Jul 2025 · M.S. Karnik; N.R. Borkar

The court upheld the Tribunal's order reinstating a disabled employee who was wrongfully terminated by acceptance of his voluntary retirement without informing him of his statutory rights under the Disabilities Act, 1995.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant voluntary retirement disability Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Section 47