High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

The State of Maharashtra v. Madurai alias Madra Devendra Mariappan

31 Jul 2025 · Suman Shyam; Shyam C. Chandak
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court rejected the State's application to cancel bail granted to a murder convict, holding that mere registration of offences post-bail without substantiated evidence does not justify cancellation under settled legal principles.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cancellation Section 439(2) CrPC violation of bail conditions misuse of liberty

Murlidhar Posha Gadmale & Ors. v. Union of India

31 Jul 2025 · M. M. Sathaye
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal awarding compensation to the deceased's parents, holding the deceased was a bonafide passenger who died due to an untoward incident under the Railways Act, applying strict liability and beneficial legislation principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act 1989 Railway Claims Tribunal compensation bonafide passenger

Jayesh Bandu Limje v. The State of Maharashtra

31 Jul 2025 · Shree Chandrashekhar; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court upheld cancellation of a candidate's appointment for suppressing a past conviction in the application form, affirming that such suppression justifies disqualification regardless of the offence's triviality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant suppression of criminal antecedents cancellation of candidature government employment declaration and undertaking

Balaji P. Kapale & Ors. v. Union of India

31 Jul 2025 · M.M. Sathaye
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the dependents of a deceased passenger who fell from a train, affirming the strict liability of Railways under the Railways Act, 1989 irrespective of contributory negligence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act, 1989 strict liability compensation bonafide passenger

M/s. Survee Shidal v. Airports Authority of India

30 Jul 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court held that disputes over termination and authority under a concession agreement are arbitrable, while eviction proceedings apply only to unauthorized encroachment, and granted interim status quo pending arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 Concession Agreement Section 9 interim relief

M/s. Survee Foods Private Limited v. Airports Authority of India

30 Jul 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court held that disputes over termination and authorized occupation under a concession agreement are arbitrable, while eviction proceedings apply only to unauthorized occupation, and granted interim status quo pending arbitration.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 Eviction proceedings

Sachin Corporation v. Kusuma Bhandary Construction Pvt. Ltd.

30 Jul 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court held that Arbitral Tribunals may compute and collect stamp duty and penalty on inadequately stamped instruments not covered by Section 32A of the Maharashtra Stamp Act and admit them into evidence without waiting for Stamp Authorities' assessment, enabling arbitration to proceed expeditiously.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Tribunal Stamp Duty Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Section 32A

Dilip Jagannath Ambilwade v. Government of Maharashtra

30 Jul 2025 · M. S. Karnik; N. R. Borkar

The High Court held that resignation entails forfeiture of past service barring exceptions, and the petitioner’s break in service cannot be condoned nor past service counted for pension or seniority, dismissing his writ petition challenging the Tribunal’s order.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 resignation and forfeiture of service condonation of break in service pension benefits

Suresh Sunderdas Harpalani v. Dayal Sundersad Harpalani

29 Jul 2025 · ARIF S. DOCTOR
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition for probate of a contested Will due to failure to prove due execution and the Testator's sound mind amid suspicious circumstances.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act Section 63 Will execution Testamentary suit

Sou. Usha @ Rashmi Ramesh Bhadre v. Shri Raviraj Yuvraj Chavan

29 Jul 2025 · S. M. Modak

The High Court held that sending a statutory notice by registered post to the accused's correct address suffices compliance under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act even if the notice is returned undelivered with remarks like 'left address', thereby restoring the complaint dismissed for non-service.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act service of notice presumption of service Section 114 Indian Evidence Act

Farah Deeba v. The State of Maharashtra

29 Jul 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Rajesh S. Patil · 2025:BHC-AS:31771-DB

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging derogatory social media posts against the Indian State, holding that prima facie offences were disclosed and investigation must proceed.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC freedom of speech and expression social media offences

S & M Enterprises v. The Palazzo Building No. 1 CHSL

28 Jul 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The High Court held that deemed conveyance under MOFA must be proportionate to constructed area during phased development and quashed conveyance granted for entire land before completion of all buildings.

property appeal_allowed Significant Deemed Conveyance Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Phased Development Floor Space Index

Dimple Enterprises v. Wework India Management Pvt. Ltd

25 Jul 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Supreme Court's Vidya Drolia ruling establishes that disputes under bilateral lease deeds governed by the Transfer of Property Act, including those in Greater Mumbai, are arbitrable despite exclusive jurisdiction clauses in the Small Cause Courts Act.

civil appeal_allowed Landmark arbitrability lease deed Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Small Cause Courts Act, 1882

Atomberg Technologies Private Limited v. Luker Electric Technologies Private Limited

25 Jul 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the dismissal of interim injunction against Luker Electric, holding Atomberg's registered design was prima facie prior published and lacked novelty, and appellate interference with the discretionary order was unwarranted.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Designs Act, 2000 Registered design Prior publication Interim injunction

M/s Jabs International Pvt Ltd v. State of Maharashtra & Ors

25 Jul 2025 · B. P. Colabawalla; Firdosh P. Pooniwalla

The Bombay High Court held that land acquired by the State under the MID Act cannot be declared forest land without valid service of forest notices, quashing the Forest Department's objections and directing possession and lease registration to the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Forest Land Private Forest Maharashtra Industrial Development Act Indian Forest Act Section 35(3)

The Vice President, Somaiya Trust v. Dr. Pradnya Giradkar

25 Jul 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside dismissal of a lecturer, directed her notional reinstatement up to retirement with full benefits, and clarified that filing complaints for service entitlements does not constitute moral turpitude.

labor petition_dismissed Significant moral turpitude dismissal from service reinstatement back wages

Smt. Gauri Mahesh Nalawade v. The Managing Director, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd.

25 Jul 2025 · Shree Chandrashekhar; Manjusha Deshpande

The Bombay High Court held that a candidate ranked first in a provisional select list has a vested right to appointment which cannot be overridden by a compassionate appointment to a higher post, directing appointment of the petitioner and creation of a supernumerary post for the compassionate appointee.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment provisional select list vested right to appointment public employment

Jitendra Namdev Daravkar v. The State of Maharashtra

24 Jul 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Gautam A. Ankhand

The Bombay High Court held that police cannot register an FIR or arrest a person without magistrate's permission under Section 174(2) BNSS when a non-cognizable case exists, quashing the FIR and ordering the petitioner's release.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Non-cognizable case Section 174(2) BNSS FIR registration Habeas Corpus

Vinod @ Vinayak Bhalerao Barve v. The State of Maharashtra

24 Jul 2025 · S.M. Modak

The Bombay High Court allowed an undertrial prisoner's application to be produced before the Sub-Registrar Office to execute a power of attorney, clarifying that such production is distinct from bail or SARFAESI challenges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant undertrial prisoner production before Sub-Registrar power of attorney judicial custody

Rameshlal Gurudasmal Adwani v. Gajanan Dadoba Pawar

24 Jul 2025 · Gauri Godse
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that the Appellate Court must decide appeals finally under Order XLI Rule 24 CPC when evidence is sufficient and remand should not be ordered routinely, setting aside the remand order in a suit for specific performance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XLI CPC Rule 24 CPC remand specific performance