High Court of Bombay

5,061 judgments

Year:

State of Maharashtra v. M/s Patwardhan Infrasturcture Pvt. Ltd.

23 Oct 2015 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award that wrongly converted a force majeure clause into a guaranteed minimum return clause, holding such interpretation manifestly perverse and contrary to public policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 force majeure clause contract interpretation business efficacy test

Piramal Enterprises Limited v. The State of Maharashtra

15 Oct 2015 · G. S. Kulkarni; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Bombay High Court upheld the taxability of transfer of intellectual property rights in a slump sale under the MVAT Act, affirmed the reviewing authority's jurisdiction, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the review order and demand notice.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 slump sale transfer of business intellectual property rights

Lotus Logistics and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Evertop Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited

15 Oct 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award directing specific performance of a terminated development agreement based on the developer's admissions and ordered damages for failure to procure occupation certificate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant specific performance termination of contract arbitral award occupation certificate

Jalaram Ashish Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. The Competent Authority and the District Deputy Registrar and Ors.

07 Oct 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that the Competent Authority must convey the entire land as per MOFA agreements and condoned delay caused by management issues and COVID-19, setting aside the partial conveyance order and remanding for fresh decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1964 Section 11 MOFA unilateral deemed conveyance conveyance of land

Babasaheb Bhau Kamble v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

05 Oct 2015 · DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR; SANDEEP V. MARNE
Cites 1 · Cited by 12

The High Court set aside the promotion of respondent No.4 to Health Executive Officer for non-fulfillment of eligibility service and directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s promotion based on seniority and merit.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority reservation disciplinary proceedings

Shri Bipin Badani v. Union of India

19 Aug 2015 · G. S. Kulkarni; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 17

The Bombay High Court held that denial of cross-examination of witnesses in Customs adjudication proceedings does not violate natural justice when ample corroborative evidence exists and an efficacious statutory appeal remedy is available.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 138B natural justice cross-examination

The Trustees of American School Bombay Education Trust v. The Union of India

17 Aug 2015 · DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR; KAMAL KHATA
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Bombay High Court held that an educational institution existing solely for education and not for profit is entitled to exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act despite part of its income and expenditure occurring outside India, limiting the scope of inquiry at approval stage to existence alone.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 10(23C)(vi) Income Tax Act educational institution exemption foreign receipts and expenditure SAIESF

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Maya Govind Patel

29 Jul 2015 · Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation for death caused by rash and negligent driving of an insured vehicle, emphasizing the insurer's failure to disprove vehicle involvement or breach of policy.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Compensation Insurance liability

Ashok Kacharu Gaikwad v. Rev. Samuel Shankar Chandekar & Ors.

10 Jul 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne · 2026:BHC-AS:10243

The Bombay High Court upheld a decree under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act restoring possession to Plaintiffs, holding that mere occupation as a caretaker does not confer settled possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act possession dispossession caretaker possession

Crystal Construction Company v. State of Maharashtra

18 Jun 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 0 · Cited by 185

The Bombay High Court held that the predetermined auction price fixed by the Charity Commissioner under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act is the true market value for stamp duty levy under the first Proviso to Rule 4(6) of the Maharashtra Stamp Rules, but the Collector of Stamps may verify the sale process as per Circular dated 13 October 2006 before adjudication.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Stamp Rules 1995 Charity Commissioner Market value Stamp duty

Wipro Limited v. Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd. & State of Maharashtra

27 May 2015 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; Sandeep V. Marne, J

The Bombay High Court held that in absence of a forfeiture clause, MADC cannot forfeit Wipro's advance payment for land allotment and ordered refund with interest, excusing delay due to ongoing negotiations.

civil petition_allowed Significant forfeiture of advance payment Letter of Acceptance delay and laches writ jurisdiction

High Court On Its Own Motion v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

20 May 2015 · Revati Mohite Dere; Sandesh D. Patil
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Bombay High Court mandated all municipal and state authorities to maintain roads and footpaths safely using scientific methods, establish effective grievance redressal systems, and ensure accountability to protect citizens' fundamental rights.

administrative petition_allowed Significant potholes road maintenance municipal corporations grievance redressal mechanism

Shri Swami Samarth Apang Seva Mandal v. Madhukar Dashrath Ghodke

19 May 2015 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that a B.Ed. qualification is not equivalent to the mandatory D.Ed. for primary school teachers under the Special School Code, setting aside reinstatement of an untrained teacher lacking the prescribed qualification.

labor petition_allowed Significant Special School Code 1997 D.Ed. qualification B.Ed. qualification primary school teacher eligibility

Dolphin Co. Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

14 May 2015 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna
Cites 0 · Cited by 32

The Bombay High Court held CIDCO's refusal to approve an additional member and withhold Occupancy Certificate for a completed building was arbitrary and illegal, directing immediate issuance of the certificate and approval.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Occupancy Certificate CIDCO Co-operative Housing Society Additional Member Admission

ICICI Bank Limited v. Union of India

11 May 2015 · M. S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Bombay High Court refused to quash a delayed show cause notice or direct refund without adjudication, instead ordering expeditious adjudication of service tax refund claims on interchange fees paid under protest.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax interchange fees refund under protest show cause notice

FICCI-Multiplex Association of India v. State of Maharashtra

08 May 2015 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 26

The Bombay High Court upheld the State's power to levy entertainment duty on convenience fees charged for online ticket booking under the Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, dismissing challenges to the amendment as constitutionally valid and within legislative competence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act entertainment duty convenience fees online ticket booking

Mangesh Sadanand Masane & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

27 Apr 2015 · A.S. Gadkari; Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants who attacked the deceased with deadly weapons, rejecting their plea of sudden fight under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC murder premeditation

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. The Indian Hotels Company Ltd.

20 Apr 2015 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. · 2022 SCC OnLine Bom. 6227

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Municipal Corporation's belated appeals due to inordinate delay and held that bureaucratic inefficiency does not justify condonation of delay under statutory limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay statutory limitation Section 218D Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act government appeals

Ramrao Tukaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra

16 Apr 2015 · Amit Borkar
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Bombay High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking condonation of delay in challenging auction sale, holding that false statements and suppression of facts disentitle petitioners from relief under writ jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay writ jurisdiction suppression of facts false statement on oath

Shrihari Madhav Wagh v. Pandurang Gopal Wagh and Ors.

01 Apr 2015 · N.J. Jamadar

The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the appellate order granting injunction in a co-ownership land dispute, holding that the appellate court erred in interfering with the trial court's discretionary order without cogent evidence of exclusive possession.

civil petition_allowed Significant temporary injunction discretionary order co-ownership partition suit