High Court of Bombay

5,061 judgments

Year:

Shridhar K. Berde v. Ranjeetmal J. Oswal & Ors.

02 Oct 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court set aside an eviction decree for failure to comply with mandatory conditions under Section 16(6) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, emphasizing the landlord's obligation to allot equivalent premises in case of demolition and reconstruction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 16(1)(g) Section 16(1)(i) Section 16(6)

Qualcomm India Private Limited v. Union of India and others

30 Sep 2014 · Ujjal Bhuyan; Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 10

The Bombay High Court held that interest on delayed service tax refunds under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act is mandatorily payable if refunds are sanctioned beyond three months from application receipt, regardless of intent, and directed payment of such interest to the petitioner.

tax petition_allowed Significant section 11B Central Excise Act section 11BB Central Excise Act interest on delayed refund service tax refund

Ashapura Options Private Limited v. Ashapura Developers

30 Sep 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Bombay High Court granted interim injunction restoring Plaintiffs' possession of commercial premises, holding they had settled possession and were unlawfully dispossessed without due process under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act possession dispossession interim injunction

Vasanti Parsottam Patel v. Union of India

29 Sep 2014 · Jitendra Jain, J.
Cites 1 · Cited by 9

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal and held that death of a bona fide passenger falling from a moving train qualifies as an untoward incident entitling compensation, rejecting reliance on unexamined hearsay to deny the claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal untoward incident compensation fall from moving train

Grand Paradi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. v. Mont Blanc Properties & Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. and K. Raheja Corp Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.

25 Sep 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court held that it lost jurisdiction to decide an amendment application after automatic statutory transfer of the suit to the City Civil Court under the Bombay City Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 2023.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pecuniary jurisdiction automatic transfer amendment of plaint Bombay City Civil Court Act

Modern India Limited & Ors. v. Financial Technologies (I) Ltd

02 Sep 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne J.

The Bombay High Court upheld the competence of its appointed committee to crystallize liabilities of third party noticees and passed a decree against Vimladevi Agrotech Ltd. for Rs. 13.72 crores with interest, rejecting objections on procedural and jurisdictional grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant High Court Committee Third Party Noticee Bombay High Court Original Side Rules Order XXVI CPC

Sudesh Gurudas Jotkar v. Pariwar Co-operative Housing Society Limited

01 Sep 2014 · Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court dismissed the application of 61 society members seeking to be impleaded as defendants in a suit for specific performance, holding that only the society can assert rights under the agreement and the members are neither necessary nor proper parties.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order I Rule 10(2) CPC co-operative housing society necessary party proper party

Ashok Hari Shitlani v. State of Maharashtra

11 Aug 2014 · R.D. Dhanuka; Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court quashed a consent award passed after lapse of land acquisition proceedings and without notice to the rightful owner, affirming that acquisition awards must be passed within prescribed time and ownership disputes lie with civil courts.

property petition_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 11A Consent Award Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings

Special Situation Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Bank of India

05 Aug 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Court held that the Bank has discretion to choose the fee payment option post-sale and dismissed the Plaintiff's claim for higher fees on 100% cash sales under the Mandate Letter.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Financial Advisor Non-Performing Assets Success Fee Mandate Letter

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. v. M/s. Technocraft Industries (I) Ltd.

28 Jul 2014 · G.S. Kulkarni
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum lacked jurisdiction to review its own order and set aside its impugned order passed without notice to the petitioner.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Electricity Act 2003 Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Fuel Adjustment Cost

Janabai Nivrutti Saune v. Dharmveer Shambhuraje & Ors.

14 Jul 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of reinstatement after illegal termination, upholding compensation awarded and emphasizing strict adherence to seniority and reservation rules in retrenchment.

labor petition_dismissed termination of service reinstatement seniority retrenchment

The State of Maharashtra v. Shri Shrikant Dhondu Suttar & Ors.

10 Jun 2014 · Nitin Jamdar; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The High Court held that primary school teachers are not eligible for the limited departmental competitive examination for Deputy Education Officer recruitment under the 2016 Rules and 2014 Amendment, setting aside the Tribunal's contrary order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Deputy Education Officer Recruitment Rules 2016 District Technical Service District Service Primary Teachers eligibility

Bharat J. Patel v. State of Maharashtra

11 Apr 2014 · R. D. Dhanuka; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court quashed the acquisition of petitioner’s land under the Slum Act due to collusive consent decree proceedings and violation of natural justice.

property petition_allowed Significant Slum Rehabilitation Authority Maharashtra Slum Areas Act land acquisition consent decree

Armin R. Panthaky v. Rohinton Panthaky

03 Apr 2014 · M.S. Sonak; B.P. Colabawalla; R.I. Chagla

The Bombay High Court held that courts under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act retain discretion to direct or allow recording of evidence before a Court Commissioner under the Civil Procedure Code, promoting judicial efficiency without compromising fairness.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 Court Commissioner Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC Order XXVI CPC

The Principal Secretary, Tribal Development Department v. Shrikrishna s/o. Dharampal Malwade

01 Apr 2014 · Dhiraj Singh Thakur; Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing counting of contractual service rendered prior to regularisation against regularly sanctioned posts for all service benefits except monetary benefits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant contractual service regularisation service benefits Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

Jobi Joseph v. M/s. Cadbury India Ltd. & Ors.

01 Apr 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne

The Bombay High Court held that a senior sales executive engaged in supervisory duties over distributor salesmen is not an 'employee' under the MRTU & PULP Act, dismissing his challenge to termination.

labor petition_dismissed Significant employee definition sales promotion employee supervisory capacity Industrial Disputes Act

SGS Infratech Limited v. Union of India

28 Mar 2014 · M. S. Sonak; Kamal Khata
Cites 2 · Cited by 32

The Bombay High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006, holding that the pre-deposit of disputed tax amount as a condition for appeal is not arbitrary and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Section 96(b) Cantonment Act 2006 pre-deposit condition constitutional validity right to appeal

Avinash Dhavji Naik and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

01 Mar 2014 · M. S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Bombay High Court held that while the MRTP Act is a self-contained code excluding certain Land Acquisition Act provisions, the acquisition awards were void for lack of prior approval and lapsed due to delay, quashing the acquisition proceedings.

property appeal_allowed Significant MRTP Act Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 11

Zubaida W/O. Kadar Memon & Ors. v. Khan Mubeen Ahmed Ali & Ors.

25 Feb 2014 · Sandeep V. Marne
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the Waqf Tribunal's decree evicting alleged encroachers from Waqf property, affirming that persons interested in a Waqf can directly file suits for removal of encroachment without mandatory recourse to CEO procedures under Sections 54 and 55 of the Waqf Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Waqf Act, 1995 Section 83(2) Section 54 and 55 encroachment

Anish Modi v. Union of India

18 Feb 2014 · R. N. Laddha
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Bombay High Court quashed prosecution against an independent director for non-payment of TDS due to non-service of mandatory notice under Section 2(35)(b) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of procedural compliance before initiating criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 276-B Section 278-B Section 2(35)(b)