Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Vinod Kumar Bhatia v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of an ex-employee under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 for wrongful withholding of company property post retirement, affirming the successor entity's right to initiate proceedings.
Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(3)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the assessee's appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, upholding the ITAT's order treating unexplained excess cash deposits as income under Section 69C, holding that no substantial question of law arose.
Greenway Modern School v. Rammilan Rawat and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a chargesheet issued by a school manager, if ratified by the Disciplinary Authority Committee constituted under Rule 118, is valid, set aside the Tribunal's quashing of removal order, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Deepak Gupta v. Kirori Mal College & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the chargesheet as premature, holding that mere issuance of chargesheet without adjudication by the disciplinary authority does not warrant interference.
Kamal Rajput v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while leaving the validity of related tax notifications open pending Supreme Court review.
Trident Limited v. Controller of Patents
Delhi High Court set aside patent refusal for yarn with homogeneously distributed pores, remanding for fresh inventive step analysis considering appellant's manufacturing parameters and avoiding hindsight bias.
Haveli Restaurant and Resorts Limited v. Registrar of Trademarks & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that 'HAVELI' is a generic term common to trade, and the impugned marks 'AMRITSAR HAVELI' and 'THE AMRITSAR HAVELI' are not deceptively similar to the appellant's marks, upholding the Registrar's order allowing their registration.
Sharmila v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear on the hearing dates.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Maj Bhavesh Talera Retd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired army officer, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected and limiting its review to errors of law apparent on record.
Singh and Sgt. Mritunjay v. Ex MWO Jai Prakash
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of 50% disability pension for Primary Hypertension to a retired air force personnel, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-related unless proven otherwise.
Kumar Singh and Sgt Mritunjay v. 651705 EX JWO Billu Singh (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising after service entry are service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
Rani Alankar Jewellers Private Ltd. v. Kundan Lal and Sons
The Delhi High Court set aside a premature ex-parte decree passed before expiry of the 30-day period to file a written statement under Order VIII CPC, emphasizing procedural fairness despite the Commercial Courts Act's mandate for expeditious disposal.
Sgt Mritunjay and Sgt Manish Kumar Singh v. Ex MWO Mohammad Yusuf Khan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless conclusively disproved by the employer.
Mritunjay and Manish Kumar Singh v. Ramesh Chandra Yadav
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex IIFL Jasbir Singh Panesar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction.
Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizer v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the fixation of fertilizer retention price and debt-equity ratio by the expert committee, limiting judicial review and dismissing the appellant's challenge to the pricing methodology and subsidy calculations.
Gautam Naug v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner’s grievance was resolved by intervening circumstances, without adjudicating on the merits.
Naresh Bansal and Ors. v. Adjudicating Authority and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging provisional attachment orders under the PMLA, holding that the Directorate had valid reason to believe and that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.
Rohit v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dowry death case after holding that the prosecution had not prima facie established cruelty in connection with dowry demand and that prolonged pre-trial detention was unjustified post investigation.
Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutionality of differential retirement ages for Indian Coast Guard officers, distinguishing it from CAPFs and applying Article 33 to validate the classification under Rule 20 of the Coast Guard Rules.