Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 v. M/S Aon Consulting Private Limited

24 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10702-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision deleting disallowance of Section 10A deductions by endorsing the assessee's reasonable allocation of expenses between 10A and non-10A units based on actual nexus and accounting standards.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 10A Income Tax Act expense allocation royalty expenses management fees

Himanshi Singh; Monalisha Pradhan; Priya Khurana v. Sanjoy Kar

24 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10661-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of Organized Accounts Cadre employees to upgraded pay scales with arrears from 01.01.1996, rejecting limitation and discrimination defenses.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Fifth Central Pay Commission Organized Accounts Cadre pay scale revision notional benefits

Union of India and Ors. v. 22787 WG CDR Apurba Kumar Gayan (Retd)

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting its interference under certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

J Jebaraj v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10469-DB

The Delhi High Court granted an extension of time to respond to a show cause notice due to petitioner’s indisposition and allowed liberty to re-approach the Court if aggrieved by the adjudication.

administrative petition_allowed show cause notice extension of time reasoned and speaking order writ petition

Sgt Mritunjay and Sgt Manish Kumar Singh v. EX NK Mithun Kumar Dubey

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension, affirming the presumption of service connection for disabilities assessed at 20% or more and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension military service attributability aggravation

Tarun & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10419
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under the amended Apprentices Act, 1961, apprentices have no legal right to preference or reservation in recruitment absent a contractual obligation, and the employer's policy fulfilling Section 22(1) suffices.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Apprentices Act, 1961 Section 22(1) Apprenticeship Policy Preference in recruitment

Sanjay Singh Meena v. Union of India and Ors

24 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10394
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the withdrawal of a job offer due to the candidate's suppression of a pending criminal case, affirming the employer's discretion to cancel candidature on such grounds.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant suppression of criminal case public employment cancellation of candidature discretion of employer

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex-WO Ganesh Chandra Sarkar

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2358
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman suffering from CAD and diabetes, affirming the presumption of service-attributability and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces coronary artery disease diabetes mellitus type II

M/S TRIOM HOSPITALITY v. M/S J.S. HOSPITALITY SERVICES PVT. LTD.

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10391-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The court held that allegations of forgery do not preclude arbitration unless the arbitration agreement is manifestly non-existent, and detailed validity issues must be decided by the arbitral tribunal, thus setting aside the refusal to refer the dispute to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act prima facie review arbitration agreement validity forgery allegations

Gaurav Khattar v. Virender Aggarwal

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10361

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging dismissal of a civil appeal on grounds of delay and improper service, holding summons were validly served and no error apparent on record was shown.

civil petition_dismissed Review Petition Section 114 CPC Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC Service of Summons

Shashank v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

24 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10430

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to significant inconsistencies and lack of corroboration in the prosecution case, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt identification parade medical examination recovery of stolen property

MEDILABO RFP INC v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10362

The Delhi High Court held that pharmaceutical composition claims are not excluded from patentability under Section 3(i) of the Patents Act, 1970, setting aside the refusal and remanding for fresh consideration of amended claims.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Section 3(i) Patents Act method of treatment exclusion pharmaceutical composition patent patent claim interpretation

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Anr. v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia, J · 2025:DHC:10342

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a patent application for sustained release pharmaceutical formulations, holding the invention obvious in light of prior art and lacking inventive step under Indian patent law.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant inventive step patent application non-aqueous carrier triglycerides

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Artura Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd.

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10348

Delhi High Court held that the presence of a 'Contact Us' page and product listings on websites can prima facie confer territorial jurisdiction in trademark infringement suits, requiring trial to decide disputed factual issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC trademark infringement passing off

Castrol Limited v. Sanjay Sonavane and Ors.

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10370

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's subsequent suit for injunction against media disparagement as barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC due to pendency of an earlier suit on the same cause of action, directing the Plaintiff to amend the earlier suit instead.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order II Rule 2 CPC cause of action commercial disparagement trademark infringement

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N. V. & ORS. v. KARMA MINDTECH & ORS.

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10345
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiffs' application for initiating criminal perjury proceedings against Defendant No. 2, holding that mere contradictions or denials in affidavits without unimpeachable evidence do not constitute perjury warranting criminal action at the interlocutory stage.

civil petition_dismissed Significant perjury false affidavit copyright infringement trade secret

Rajani Products v. Madhukar Varandani

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10368

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel a copyright registration for an artistic work substantially reproducing the petitioner’s original SWASTIK device, holding it lacked originality and violated the petitioner’s rights under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 Section 50 rectification petition artistic work

Sunil Niranjan Shah v. Vijay Bahadur

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10364

Delhi High Court grants interim injunction restraining defendant's use of marks deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademarks, affirming jurisdiction based on e-commerce presence and prior user rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction trademark infringement passing off territorial jurisdiction

Mohammed Aamir v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

24 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10435-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for denial of hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration after allowing the petitioner to file a reply, while leaving the validity of related tax notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Vansh Mehra v. State of NCT of Delhi

24 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10425

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused after completion of investigation and filing of chargesheet under Section 316(2) of the BNS, emphasizing that custody's purpose is to ensure trial attendance and not pre-trial punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed bail regular bail Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Section 316(2)