Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. 628376 EX WO Pawan Kumar Sharma

26 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10536-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless disproved by the employer, and limited its review to jurisdictional errors under certiorari.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Union of India and Ors. v. Major Anish Muralidhar (Army); Major Anish Muralidhar (Army) v. COL VS Kahlon VSM

26 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10537-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a factual finding by the Armed Forces Tribunal on empanelment marks, directing the petitioners to seek review before the tribunal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Armed Forces Tribunal empanelment marks statutory complaint review petition

Arushi Krishna Dasgupta v. Gourov Dasgupta

26 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of a guardianship petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing that such petitions must be filed where the minor child ordinarily resides.

family appeal_dismissed Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 territorial jurisdiction minor child residence Order VII Rule 10 CPC

Jhankar Banquets v. Delhi Development Authority

26 Nov 2025 · Jyoti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court holds that dispute resolution clauses in lease and licence deeds constitute valid arbitration agreements and appoints an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 7 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 validity of arbitration clause

M/S Sapna Catering v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10577

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking extension of a catering stall contract after the e-auction process was completed and a new bidder allotted the unit.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition contract extension e-auction government contract

Saroj Rejendra Kumar Mangla v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10578

Delhi High Court grants a seven-month extension of a catering stall license at Rewari Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and relying on prior similar orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Catering Stall License Extension of License Delhi High Court Jurisdiction Indian Railways Catering Policy

Metalrod Private Limited v. Registrar National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi & Anr.

26 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10579

The High Court directed the NCLT to ensure that petitions re-filed beyond the seven-day defect removal period under Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 are entertained only after the petitioner shows sufficient cause for delay, in line with Supreme Court precedent.

administrative other Significant National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 Rule 28 re-filing of petitions defect removal period

Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited & Anr v. M/S Koneru Constructions

26 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:10464
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award granting price escalation damages contrary to clear contractual prohibition and held that a voluntarily executed no dues certificate bars subsequent claims unless vitiated by coercion.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 No dues certificate Price escalation

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD v. INDO RAMA SYNTHENTICS(I) LTD

26 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:10465
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting full insurance claim for damages caused by worker riots, rejecting insurer's exclusion clause defense and limiting judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Insurance Policy Material Damage Fire (LOP) Policy

Uttarakhand Transport Corporation v. Mukesh Kumar Pal & Anr.

26 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10517

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation, holding that a chargesheet and unchallenged claimant testimony suffice to establish negligence in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence chargesheet Indian Penal Code Sections 279, 338, 427

TESLA INC. v. TESLA POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS

24 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:10367

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favor of Tesla Inc. restraining Tesla Power India from using deceptively similar 'TESLA' marks for batteries and related goods, holding that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks are valid and infringed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Trade Marks Act, 1999 Interim injunction

M/S Vivek Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

24 Nov 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:10944

The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause in an insurance policy remains valid despite an IRDAI circular and that disputes over repudiation based on policy conditions where loss is admitted are arbitrable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause insurance policy repudiation of claim IRDAI circular

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 v. M/S Aon Consulting Private Limited

24 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10702-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision deleting disallowance of Section 10A deductions by endorsing the assessee's reasonable allocation of expenses between 10A and non-10A units based on actual nexus and accounting standards.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 10A Income Tax Act expense allocation royalty expenses management fees

Himanshi Singh; Monalisha Pradhan; Priya Khurana v. Sanjoy Kar

24 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10661-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of Organized Accounts Cadre employees to upgraded pay scales with arrears from 01.01.1996, rejecting limitation and discrimination defenses.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Fifth Central Pay Commission Organized Accounts Cadre pay scale revision notional benefits

Union of India and Ors. v. 22787 WG CDR Apurba Kumar Gayan (Retd)

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting its interference under certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

J Jebaraj v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10469-DB

The Delhi High Court granted an extension of time to respond to a show cause notice due to petitioner’s indisposition and allowed liberty to re-approach the Court if aggrieved by the adjudication.

administrative petition_allowed show cause notice extension of time reasoned and speaking order writ petition

Sgt Mritunjay and Sgt Manish Kumar Singh v. EX NK Mithun Kumar Dubey

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension, affirming the presumption of service connection for disabilities assessed at 20% or more and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension military service attributability aggravation

Tarun & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10419
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under the amended Apprentices Act, 1961, apprentices have no legal right to preference or reservation in recruitment absent a contractual obligation, and the employer's policy fulfilling Section 22(1) suffices.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Apprentices Act, 1961 Section 22(1) Apprenticeship Policy Preference in recruitment

Sanjay Singh Meena v. Union of India and Ors

24 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10394
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the withdrawal of a job offer due to the candidate's suppression of a pending criminal case, affirming the employer's discretion to cancel candidature on such grounds.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant suppression of criminal case public employment cancellation of candidature discretion of employer

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex-WO Ganesh Chandra Sarkar

24 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2358
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman suffering from CAD and diabetes, affirming the presumption of service-attributability and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces coronary artery disease diabetes mellitus type II