Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

M/S PUNEET CHEMICALS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

26 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to denial of proper notice and hearing, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Section 168A GST Act Natural Justice Additional Notices Tab

Brij Kishore Gupta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

26 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10482-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an employee entitled to retrospective promotion with no delay in approaching the Tribunal must receive actual arrears of pay and benefits, not merely notional fixation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant promotion Selection Grade notional pay fixation actual arrears

Kshitiz Solanki v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

26 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10504

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a sexual exploitation and extortion case, emphasizing that prior criminal record alone cannot deny bail and indefinite custody due to pending forensic reports is unjustified once investigation is complete.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail sexual exploitation extortion false promise of marriage

Robin Gautam v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10538-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed disciplinary proceedings and reinstated an RPF constable due to lack of conclusive proof linking him to an objectionable social media post and non-application of mind by disciplinary authorities.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Rules disciplinary proceedings social media misconduct natural justice

Bakshi Speedways v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

26 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:10462
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award upholding the lawful termination of a petroleum dealership agreement, affirming limited grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting restoration of dealership as a relief.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Dealership Agreement Termination Patent Illegality

National Highways Authority of India v. CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt Ltd & Anr.

26 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10444

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking substitution of the petitioner in arbitration proceedings, holding that judicial interference under Article 227 is limited and substitution is not permissible without claimant's consent.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Article 227 Constitution of India Order XXII Rule 10 CPC Substitution of parties

Saurabh Gupta v. Sheopals Pvt Ltd

26 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla

The Delhi High Court held that the marks OPAL and SHEOPAL’S are not deceptively similar, denied interim injunction to the registered proprietor of OPAL, and clarified the limited applicability of the anti-dissection rule and dominant part test in trademark infringement cases.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Trademark infringement Deceptive similarity Anti-dissection rule Dominant part test

Ravinder Pal Singh Chauhan v. Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd and Ors

26 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10431

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction against horse racing restrictions imposed under the 'family unit' concept, emphasizing the availability of an efficacious alternate remedy under the governing Rules.

civil petition_dismissed Significant family unit horse racing interim injunction alternate remedy

Abhishek Anil v. Narcotics Control Bureau

26 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10447

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to Abhishek Anil in a commercial quantity LSD trafficking case, holding that stringent Section 37 NDPS Act conditions were not met despite prolonged incarceration and digital evidence corroborated active involvement.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS commercial quantity bail

Kanhaiya Lal v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

26 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10463-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the DDA has absolute ownership over the subject plot transferred by the Ministry of Rehabilitation, and the appellant's claimed easementary rights were unsubstantiated.

property appeal_dismissed Significant easementary rights Delhi Development Authority Displaced Persons Act Zonal Layout Plan

Akash Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)

26 Nov 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:10484

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a dowry death case due to lack of proximate evidence of cruelty, prolonged custody, and incomplete trial, emphasizing the balance between personal liberty and trial fairness.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC

Union of India & Ors. v. 670939 Ex JWO Rajendra Prasad Singh

26 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service attributable unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Primary Hypertension

Sukhdev @ Sukhdev Raj v. Ashok Kumar

26 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10452

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant who purchased only a co-owner's share during pending proceedings, holding tenancy continues unless entire ownership vests simultaneously.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition co-owner landlord-tenant relationship

Kewal Sadana and Ors. v. ITQ Technologies Pvt Ltd

26 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10460

The High Court upheld the trial court’s order refusing to delete directors from the suit where specific pleadings alleged their personal liability beyond corporate capacity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant corporate veil personal guarantee directors liability pleadings

State Bank of India v. Shri S C. Goel

26 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10486
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court dismissed the bank’s late application to file additional documents after part final arguments due to lack of satisfactory explanation, upholding the trial court’s order and emphasizing finality in civil litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A(3) CPC late filing of documents satisfactory explanation final arguments

Roche Diagnostics India Private Limited v. Delhi State Health Mission

26 Nov 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10566-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the award of a public tender to respondent no.2 based on prices inclusive of GST, dismissing the petitioner's challenge of arbitrariness and violation of tender terms.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender evaluation GST applicability public procurement price bid evaluation

Praveen Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

26 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10489

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a Section 302 IPC case after finding prima facie contradictions in prosecution evidence and considering the petitioner’s prolonged custody and lack of criminal antecedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 302 IPC eyewitness testimony dying declaration

Ravi Kant Bharti v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

26 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10490

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a rape case holding that the question of false promise to marry vitiating consent is to be decided at trial and pre-trial detention without trial commencement violates Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 376 IPC false promise to marry consent

Sri Rajarajeswari College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

26 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10491

The Delhi High Court held that withdrawal of recognition by NCTE takes effect from the academic session next following communication of the order, allowing only already admitted students to continue and prohibiting fresh admissions thereafter.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 Section 17 withdrawal of recognition second proviso to Section 17(1) B.Ed. course recognition

Shankar v. State of NCT of Delhi

26 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10501
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for gang rape of a child, affirming that consistent child testimony and common intention suffice for conviction under Section 376D IPC and POCSO Act despite minor contradictions and absence of appellant's DNA evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant gang rape child witness testimony Section 376D IPC POCSO Act