Delhi High Court
64,846 judgments
Baby Angel v. Sachdeva Public School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a school must admit a student allotted admission as an EWS candidate through the DoE's computerized draw of lots under the RTE Act and cannot deny admission without valid reason.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences v. Arvind Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's final order passed without allowing the petitioner reasonable time to file a counter reply, emphasizing the necessity of procedural fairness even in urgent matters.
VIVO MOBILE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated without affording the assessee an opportunity to respond to new allegations, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice and statutory procedure under the Income Tax Act.
Sports Authority of India v. Dr. Hema Valecha
Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction for vacancy details as impermissible interference, upheld stay of transfer orders, and directed respondents be allowed to rejoin duty pending expeditious disposal of their Original Applications.
Jagdish Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of gratuity from a retired employee post-retirement is impermissible and directed grant of delayed ACP Scheme benefits with consequential pay fixation.
Infibeam Avenues Limited v. Government E-Marketplace
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief against alleged unauthorized use of software by a third-party service provider after the provider gave a binding undertaking limiting use to authorized maintenance of the GeM portal.
Court on its Own Motion v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court, recognizing systemic deficiencies in government hospital services violating constitutional rights, constituted an expert Committee to recommend reforms ensuring timely and adequate medical care under Articles 21 and 47.
Rakesh Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of parole beyond prescribed limits under Delhi Prison Rules, emphasizing parole as a privilege governed by strict procedural rules and sparing judicial intervention.
Nagravision India Private Limited v. Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research
The Delhi High Court held that weighted tax deductions under Section 35(2AB) apply to all expenditure incurred on in-house R&D facilities from the start of the financial year of application, not just from the date of DSIR approval.
K N Govindacharya v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking public disclosure of intermediaries' designated officers under Rule 13 of the 2009 IT Rules, holding no such obligation exists and that the 2021 IT Rules provide an adequate grievance redressal mechanism.
M/S Madras Trading Co v. Ramjeet @ Ramajeet & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Employees Compensation Act, holding that FIR and related evidence suffice to establish employer-employee relationship and accident during employment in summary proceedings.
Rishu Gupta v. Rachna Gupta
The Delhi High Court decreed physical partition of a jointly owned family property by metes and bounds, appointing a Local Commissioner to oversee division and directing equitable sharing of costs and maintenance.
Union of India & Ors. v. Satya Pal Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s orders directing retrospective termination without prior notice is impermissible and the respondent is entitled to salary arrears for the period prior to formal termination.
Hansraj Surana v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226 to grant parole to a convict for attending his mother's funeral, emphasizing judicial intervention in parole matters on compassionate grounds when competent authorities delay or refuse consideration.
Pravin Jain v. Alps Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for dishonour of cheque under Section 138 NI Act due to lack of specific averments that he was in charge of the accused firm, affirming the requirement of such averments for vicarious liability.
Dharamvir Singh v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(A), 509, and 506 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Dr. Renu v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed writ petition challenging freezing of bank accounts for lack of territorial jurisdiction as FIR and cause of action arose in Karnataka.
Future Generali Insurance Co Ltd v. Rameshwar Choudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Employees' Compensation Act for death arising out of employment, rejecting the insurer's plea of bar under the Employees' State Insurance Act due to lack of evidence.
Ekta Mahar & Ors. v. Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the university to consider the petitioners' claim as a representation and decide it within two weeks, without ordering immediate appointment, emphasizing administrative discretion and lawful procedure.
Sahebrao Kashinath Muneshwar v. Union of India
Delhi High Court held that contractual employees appointed under the TV 2020 scheme are not entitled to regularization or permanent absorption absent sanctioned regular posts and proper recruitment process.