Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Pravin Jain v. Alps Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for dishonour of cheque under Section 138 NI Act due to lack of specific averments that he was in charge of the accused firm, affirming the requirement of such averments for vicarious liability.
Dharamvir Singh v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(A), 509, and 506 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Dr. Renu v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed writ petition challenging freezing of bank accounts for lack of territorial jurisdiction as FIR and cause of action arose in Karnataka.
Future Generali Insurance Co Ltd v. Rameshwar Choudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Employees' Compensation Act for death arising out of employment, rejecting the insurer's plea of bar under the Employees' State Insurance Act due to lack of evidence.
Ekta Mahar & Ors. v. Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the university to consider the petitioners' claim as a representation and decide it within two weeks, without ordering immediate appointment, emphasizing administrative discretion and lawful procedure.
Sahebrao Kashinath Muneshwar v. Union of India
Delhi High Court held that contractual employees appointed under the TV 2020 scheme are not entitled to regularization or permanent absorption absent sanctioned regular posts and proper recruitment process.
Ajanta Soya Limited v. The Oriental Insurance Company
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to inordinate delay violating Section 29A of the Arbitration Act but extended the tribunal's mandate till March 2024 considering the pandemic-related circumstances.
Maahi Neil Jaipal v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a foreign national seeking admission under a supernumerary quota in the University of Delhi's integrated five-year law programmes for 2023-2024, holding no quota was prescribed for that year.
Gaurav Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of investigation, holding that the petitioner’s remedy under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is available and it is premature to interfere under Article 226 or Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Raj Kumar Saini
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a charge memorandum due to inordinate and unexplained delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings against a government officer.
Ajit Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to Ajit Singh in a murder conspiracy case, holding that weak prima facie evidence and mere suspicion do not justify denial of bail under Article 21.
Union of India v. Jagdish Rai
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing that the respondent's entire service period, except a specified gap, be counted for pension benefits due to absence of termination and limitation not starting before retirement.
Commissioner CGST Delhi South v. M/S Nitin Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a refund order under the CGST Act on the ground that the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold and no constitutional or legality challenge was raised.
M/S K.M Food Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. The Director General DGGI Headquarters, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that seizure of currency under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act is impermissible as money is excluded from 'goods', and directed the return of seized cash to the petitioners.
Bahadur Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a belated Section 11 application challenging a 1958 Bhumidhari Certificate is barred by limitation and res judicata, and only a person in cultivatory possession has locus to maintain such a claim under the Delhi Land Reforms Act.
Axis Bank Ltd v. UV Assets Reconstruction Co
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding ECGC claim monies to the assignee, holding that limited grounds under Section 34 do not permit setting aside the award despite overlapping insolvency proceedings and limitation objections.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Vivo resolving all patent infringement and FRAND disputes, leading to dismissal of the suit and connected proceedings.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Oppo resolving patent infringement disputes and dismissed the suit and counterclaims accordingly.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Vivo Mobile Communication Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Vivo in a patent infringement suit, dismissed the suit and counterclaim as withdrawn, and allowed deletion of confidential records.
Nokia Technologies OY v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court recorded a global settlement between Nokia and Oppo in a patent infringement suit involving SEPs, dismissed the suit and counterclaims, and directed refund of pro-tem deposits.