Delhi High Court
64,846 judgments
Sony India Private Limited v. Iris Worldwide Integrated Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing payment of disputed agency fees under a revised contract, affirming acceptance by conduct and silence and dismissing the appellant's challenge under the Arbitration Act.
Virendra Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the non-revision of pension based on a separate E-9A pay scale, holding that pay fixation is a Government policy matter not subject to judicial interference.
Vikas Balguar @ Shammi v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a murder case due to hostile witnesses, long incarceration, and ongoing trial, emphasizing the balance between liberty and seriousness of offence.
Kanta Gupta v. Goverdhan Dass Daga LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act due to the landlord's concealment of vital facts negating bona fide requirement, affirming limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 25B(8).
Aparna Choudhrie Kala v. Vaibhav Kala
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's grant of leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that the defendant raised substantial defence and triable issues, and that the revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC does not permit reappraisal of such findings.
Senthilvelkumar v. State Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging FIR registration, holding that prior complaints and affidavit support satisfied Section 156(3) CrPC requirements and mala fide allegations do not warrant quashing at the investigation stage.
A.K. Al Muhaidib and Sons v. Chaman Lal Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the trademark "AL-WALIMAH" registered to respondent no.1 for non-use under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, holding that the petitioner was a person aggrieved and the mark was not bona fide used.
Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order for non-filing of returns, restoring registration subject to compliance with filing and statutory rules.
Raghav Arora L/H of Sh. Gopal Kishan Arora v. GST Officer, Ward 78, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, modifying the cancellation date to the Show Cause Notice date instead of an earlier retrospective date.
Aditi Agencies v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to lack of reasons and opportunity to object, restoring the registration subject to compliance.
Dharam Bir v. Charan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's appointment of a Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to measure disputed property walls, ruling it a proper exercise of judicial discretion to elucidate factual controversies without delegating judicial functions.
Harmohinder Singh v. Joginder Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed refund of excess court fee paid in a partition suit but held that only one joint decree can be drawn, dismissing the request for separate decrees.
M/S ANTRIKSH ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. SH. BRAHAM PRAKASH YADAV & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit disclosed a cause of action and was within limitation as per the plaint's averments.
Amarjeet Malik v. DDA & Others
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to recall dismissal of restoration application for non-appearance due to unavoidable circumstances and restored the original suit for adjudication.
Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary v. Mahesh Bagchandka & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC, holding that the complaint alleging encroachment was civil in nature, the petitioner lacked locus standi, and had abused the court process by concealing prior litigations.
Sunil Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed petition challenging disqualification and vacancy count in ITBP Head Constable recruitment, holding candidates must meet cut-off and cannot claim more vacancies than advertised.
Vijay Gupta and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable and voluntary settlement between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Anupam Singh Gautam & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 354, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Purushottam Sahu v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 304B IPC, holding that serious offences affecting societal interests cannot be quashed merely on the basis of compromise between parties.
Harkesh Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 509, 354, and 506 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.