Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Hem Chand v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding land demarcation within eight weeks, without prejudicing jurisdictional objections.
Devendra Singh Rana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that withdrawal of a voluntary retirement request by a government servant requires Appointing Authority approval, and rejection of such withdrawal without reasons is not legally impermissible, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.
Sarita Garg v. Aman Gupta & Ors.
The court held that a suit challenging a registered Will and seeking consequential reliefs like Partition is maintainable if filed within three years of knowledge, and such reliefs can be claimed in the same suit under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act.
Nicholas Nzube Ukaegbu v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case due to non-compliance with mandatory sample-drawing procedures under Section 52A, which vitiated the prosecution's primary evidence.
Meena Devi v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of a freedom fighter's pension claim under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, holding that evidentiary requirements were not met and the State Government's recommendation is not binding on the Central Government.
Vipin Saini & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Surender Kumar v. Late Sh. Dhani Ram through LRs and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and restored the partition suit after holding that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC does not attain finality if liberty to file a fresh suit is granted, and that multiple suits for partition are permissible if distinct reliefs are sought.
OSWAL AGENCIES PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to consider the petitioner’s reply and remanded the matter for a fresh speaking order with personal hearing.
Paras Enterprises v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to provide the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and remanded the matter for re-adjudication.
D.C. SALES THROUGH PROPRIETOR DINESH BANSAL v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for lack of opportunity to be heard and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.
M/S Dashmesh Wires and Cables (India) v. Commissioner of GST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and reasoned order, and modified the cancellation to operate from the date petitioner ceased business.
M/S. M.K. ENTERPRISES v. M/S. VOHRA RUBBER AND ELECTRICALS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a settlement recorded in a police station does not automatically constitute an admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, and dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to grant a decree on admission in a commercial recovery suit.
Rudal Prajapati v. Jain Samnopasak Sr. Sec. School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award dismissing the petitioner’s claim of illegal termination, holding that failure to complete 240 days of continuous service precluded protection under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
M/S Envisage v. M/S SAK Buildtech Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed without the respondent's consent, affirming that such appointment lacks jurisdiction under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
GEE INTERNATIONALS v. DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act due to respondent's delay in dispute resolution, directing parties to attempt settlement before arbitration proceeds.
Sh. Tarun Kataria v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a mid-process change in recruitment criteria, holding that a candidate who participates without protest waives the right to later challenge the selection procedure.