Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Shashi Oberoi v. Yashpal Chawla
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, holding that the petitioner failed to prove bona fide requirement due to concealment of alternative accommodation and contradictory evidence.
Sunil Madan Mandhan v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the probate of a Will executed by the Testator, rejecting the appellant's allegations of forgery and undue influence due to lack of credible evidence.
Hitesh Sharma & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Surender Basoya v. Sanjeev Joon
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a Sale Deed due to dishonour of post-dated cheques, affirming the suit as commercial and dismissing the appeal challenging the decree for recovery, possession, and injunction.
M/S Fire Immune Systems v. M/S Elesco Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's decree for possession and mesne profits, holding that a suit instituted by a company Director is maintainable, landlord-tenant relationship was proved, and a fresh suit after return of plaint is permissible when a subsequent cause of action arises.
Sanjay Aggarwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that investigation and attachment proceedings under the PMLA are not barred by SFIO jurisdiction under the Companies Act, and a Provisional Attachment Order can be validly issued without a prior chargesheet if supported by sufficient material.
CYBERSEC INFORMATICS v. AVION NETWORK
The High Court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to file a Written Statement to the amended plaint and held that framing additional issues is within the trial court's discretion.
Kanchan Saini & Anr. v. Shiv Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order permitting the respondent to file newly created ownership documents during trial despite delay, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.
Kanika Kandhari v. Rishi Kandhari
The Delhi High Court set aside Family Court orders dismissing restitution petition without evidence and non-quantified maintenance, directing fresh adjudication with proper procedure and quantification.
Jitesh @ Jitu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in heroin trafficking, holding that recoveries from co-accused can be clubbed to attract the statutory bar under Section 37 NDPS Act given the commercial quantity and incriminating material.
Nikita Jain alias Nikki Jain & Anr. v. Ram Phal alias Ram Pal and Anr.
The High Court held that under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC, only the court may recall witnesses for clarifications and parties cannot summon new witnesses after evidence closure, dismissing the petitioners' application to summon an attesting witness to prove a Will.
The President Indian Association of Private Psychiatry and Ors v. Dr Goutam Saha and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an ex-parte injunction as not maintainable but directed the trial court to expedite the hearing of all pending interlocutory applications by pre-poning the scheduled date.
Sunil Nigam @ Sushil Nigam v. Sanjeet Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file the respondent’s income tax returns as additional documents despite earlier rejection, subject to costs and the respondent’s right to challenge proof.
United Poly Engineering Pvt. Ltd v. Yatra Online Pvt. Ltd
The High Court upheld the trial court’s order permitting examination of a substituted witness with the petitioner’s consent and dismissed the petition challenging refusal to cross-examine the substituted witness.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination from ITBP service on medical grounds, holding that absence of a Medical Review Board request and finality of statutory appeal upheld the termination order.
Sushil Kumar Jain v. Kiran Chadha
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant for non-payment of rent and bona fide requirement by the landlady, holding that the landlord's better title sufficed and the tenant failed to raise a triable issue.
Ravi Popli v. Chakr Innovation Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly.
Vakila v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that failure to issue a Show Cause Notice within the statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act mandates release of seized goods, directing the Customs Department to release the petitioner's gold chain.
Sukhbir Singh v. The Commissioner of Custom
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner an opportunity to file an appeal against the customs confiscation order despite procedural lapses, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice in customs proceedings.
Sandeep Yadav v. The Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court ordered release of a seized gold chain as no Show Cause Notice was issued within the statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962.