Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Rajeev Kumar v. Govt. of NCT and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition challenging the answer key for a recruitment exam question, directing re-evaluation and appointment of the petitioner if eligible, while limiting the relief to avoid reopening the entire selection process.
Union of India and Another v. Balister Singh Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order restoring the third MACP benefit effective from 2012, affirming the applicability of MACP Scheme Illustration 28 and rejecting retrospective application objections.
Tejinder Singh v. Beverley Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s refusal to record evidence via local commissioner or video conferencing in matrimonial proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of respondent’s consent and medical incapacity for such relief.
Prem Nath Malhotra v. Nalini Kohli
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that unsupported claims on land use and tenant's age do not justify resisting eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Anju Khosla v. Income Tax Officer Ward 15 1 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued beyond the limitation period for AY 2015-16, holding that TOLA does not apply and such notices are invalid.
Jagdish Singh; Rohit Dabas; Amit Dabas v. Union of India; Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Lt. Governor of Delhi; Govt. of India; Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the writ petition directing payment of compensation with statutory interest to petitioners for land possession taken under a 2005 Award, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Union of India v. Air Cmde Ram Pratap Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting writ review to errors of law.
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited v. Vinod Singh Negi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that electricity connections may be granted or continued in unauthorized constructions pending MCD action, with mandatory disconnection upon MCD's intimation of demolition or sealing.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sgt Satyavir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting writ interference to errors of law.
Major Anish Murlidhar v. Col Anirudha Nath
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting its review to errors of law.
Mukesh Khanna v. Des Raj Jewellers
The High Court held that review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is limited and cannot be used to reappraise evidence or substitute the original order, setting aside the review allowed by the Additional Rent Controller and restoring the eviction order.
Kavita Devi v. Baljeet Singh
The Delhi High Court enhanced the maintenance awarded to a wife under Section 125 CrPC after correctly assessing the parties' incomes and reaffirming the husband's absolute duty to maintain his wife regardless of her earning capacity.
Namit Arora & Anr. v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of non-executive nominee directors in a corporate fraud case, holding that sufficient material existed to proceed and that exoneration by other agencies did not bar prosecution.
Mandava Ashapriya v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no novation occurred to extinguish the original loan debt, validating the dishonoured post-dated cheques and upholding criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act, while partially discharging a non-executive director for lack of specific allegations.
Akasaki Technology (P) Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The High Court held that jurisdictional issues regarding the validity of an assessment order under Section 144 must be decided by the appellate authority before remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer, setting aside the ITAT and CIT(A) orders and remanding the case for fresh adjudication.
Appellant v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a stepfather for repeated sexual assault of his minor stepdaughter, affirming that a child victim's consistent statements and corroborative medical evidence suffice to sustain conviction despite hostile cross-examination and absence of forensic evidence.
Orient Green Power Company Ltd. v. SM Milkose Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 2.50 crores plus interest, dismissing the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and rejecting the petitioner’s counterclaim as barred by limitation.
E.S. Nathan v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a bank employee for unauthorized fund transfers, holding that the disciplinary inquiry was fair, the admission statement valid, and the court's role limited to ensuring procedural compliance without reappreciating evidence.
Anu Duggal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of investigation into Arnav Duggal's death to the CBI, holding the police investigation was not mala fide and the death was supported by medical evidence as suicide.
Sarwar Raza v. Ombudsman Reserve Bank of India
The Delhi High Court directed Citibank to refund disputed fraudulent credit card charges without penalties, held the bank responsible for recovery agents' harassment, and mandated RBI to strengthen Ombudsman complaint handling to protect consumers from unauthorized electronic banking transactions.